That's why he was the GOAT.AC Green is maybe the greatest example of the exception proving the rule:
A lot of players have won titles. Many have won MVP. No other has done what AC accomplished. On the Showtime Lakers no less...
That's why he was the GOAT.AC Green is maybe the greatest example of the exception proving the rule:
Ball era is a real thing.
Agreed.Magic Johnson has definitely never cheated on anyone thats for sure
Magic Johnson has definitely never cheated on anyone thats for sure
Because I'm sure Baby Rudy Gay would have been a game changer against Curry/KD/Klay/Dray.
If I'm Lebron, when I need a nanomachine recharge I wanna see Wiggins out there at SF instead of Richard Jefferson.
I'm dead someone either made this for me, or I spoke it into existence
Lonzo Ball "XO Tour Llif3" ᴴᴰ
I don't watch any college ball, so this is the first Ball related thing I've seen outside that mix tape of his dad. My prediction if the Lakers take him? Pain.
Jacked shooting motion.
Hops? eh, not really. He's 6'6 right?
Always in a t shirt cause he's not exactly Kawhi Leonard ripped.
How's that for a scouting report?
This trade is lateral at best as far as the Cavs are concerned. I think he's just as awkward as Love is for their lineups.
If I'm Lebron, when I need a nanomachine recharge I wanna see Wiggins out there at SF instead of Richard Jefferson.
By this time you are already down 25 because with no Love you are forced to play Frye and Thompson heavy minutes.
i love boogie but the trade really doesn't make sense
although i would love to see how he'd perform under lebron's guidance
Oh wow haven't seen that one in years!So far we've had a lot of no-calls from the refs so I expect some whistles being blown more often than not by Game 4. and the Cavs don't look tired at all rather playing their "style" of ball. The difference between the Cavs and Spurs is Star power and depth both are crucial if you want to beat the Warriors.
That ones good, I saw this commercial when watching Space Jam the other day
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=X_0Z0hRUgOQ
By this time you are already down 25 because with no Love you are forced to play Frye and Thompson heavy minutes.
His IQ and passing ability are transcendent.
No. Love is far more valuable the way the Cavs play to trade him for Boogie.
Scratch that whole thought. I'm remembering things wrong and assuming the Cavs could have just signed Love as a free agent and kept Wiggins.
You mean CarmeloAndrew Wiggins would have been a real nice piece to have in these Finals
I thought they already had a young point guard with that description?
As for the rest, I guess I'll repeat myself. His shooting motion is obviously borked and his release looks slow. I guess he starts from scratch or struggles, what's his free throw percentage? It can't be good dragging the ball across his upper body like that and all kinds of floppy wrist action. To the athleticism, are his impressive dunks and blow bys in the other highlights? And he's in a t shirt because he looks like a kid.
Don't take it personally, I know nothing about college and have no rooting interest. I'm in socal too, so it's not like I would mind an improved Laker team. He just looks bad, lol.
Lonzo's floor game is eerily similar to Jason Kidd's back when he was at Cal but Lonzo has a 3 point shot with inefficient mechanics. As for DeAngelo, I think it's weird that the Lakers want another PG but from the various articles I've read, management allegedly views him as immature (players don't like him generally) and incapable of actually leading the team.
Wade going to golden state. He needs more rings.
What? While I'm flattered that you think him being me is a pro, I am not Lonzo Ball, sorry budBall
Pros: Can shoot, can pass, is tall
Cons: Mediocre handles, low release, not good in pick and roll, average athleticism, questionable defender.
His two best skills are really good but literally everything else about him is a question mark.
You mean Carmelo
Ball
Pros: Can shoot, can pass, is tall
Cons: Mediocre handles, low release, not good in pick and roll, average athleticism, questionable defender.
His two best skills are really good but literally everything else about him is a question mark.
Ball
Pros: Can shoot, can pass, is tall
Cons: Mediocre handles, low release, not good in pick and roll, average athleticism, questionable defender.
His two best skills are really good but literally everything else about him is a question mark.
All this really tells me is that the Cavs had alot more clutch minutes in the playoffs despite the ongoing narrative of cakewalk. But I didn't need a video because I watched the gamesReminds me a video i saw the other day about the last 2 playoffs
]
I base it off the fact that when you click your link and filter to Finals, our unamimous MVP goes from the top to literally the second worse. But alas, the amazing NBA tool won't let you really alter the parameters to get the good data.Honest question, what are you using to base the nonsensical notion that Steph Curry isn't a good clutch player? Your imagination? Steph is #2 in PPG in clutch situations in this playoffs and last year as well.
All of his weaknesses can be fixed if he goes to the right situation and is willing to work.Ball
Pros: Can shoot, can pass, is tall
Cons: Mediocre handles, low release, not good in pick and roll, average athleticism, questionable defender.
His two best skills are really good but literally everything else about him is a question mark.
Not taking personally just a lot of bad info floating around and I think that might have affected how you (and a lot of other people) end up seeing him
And I vehemently disagree on him looking bad
Dlo has already been/is going to be relegated to the 2
His release is 0.47 sec, faster than the 0.54 NBA average. And only 0.02 seconds slower than Klay Thompson
Free throws are currently an issue for him shooting at 67%, but as Coach Nick points out it should be easily correctable and something he can work on
Yeah his dunks and blow bys are in other highlights, but that's not what makes him a great player it's his vision and passing ability. People aren't comparing him to Kidd for no reason, dude is on that trajectory.
And the dragging motion isn't an issue because he creates space or just abuses his length to make shots over guards smaller than him, which there will be a lot of because a 6'7 PG is nothing to scoff at. That in addition to his IQ means he only takes smart shots, his eFG% is the highest in this draft class and I think he was like number 2 for all PG's in the past 7 years with only Kyrie having a higher eFG% with only like 10 games?
Dude definitely has issues in breaking to his right and his midrange game is questionable, but everything else is pretty safe.
Ball
Pros: Can shoot, can pass, is tall
Cons: Mediocre handles, low release, not good in pick and roll, average athleticism, questionable defender.
His two best skills are really good but literally everything else about him is a question mark.
All of his weaknesses can be fixed if he goes to the right situation and is willing to work.
Maybe the Lakers will trade away all their young guys so they can get CP3, Paul George, LeBron when he's a free agent next year
Lonzo will be a great off ball pg that can start a fast break and shoot lights out.
People say he needs the ball in his hands all the time to be effective, but I just don't see it working at the NBA level. His PnR is horrendous, and he's not a very good iso shooter.
I don't like his fit with the Lakers, but love his fit with philly. Honestly, if I was the Lakers, Jackson's my guy. a lieup of
Russel
Jackson
Ingram
Randle
Zubac
Is young, has great length, good shooters, and good passing for the size. On the other hand
Ball
Russel
Ingram
Randle
Zubac
That is a horrid defensive lineup. You're going to get annihilated by every tema with a competent back court, and your front court isnt that much better.
I honestly do think the Lakers are going to pick Jackson, just like they "shocked" everyone by picking Russel over Okafor (Which in hindsight was a brilliant move lol)
Which is why he's going to be a 2 or an offball 1. My only though process is if the Lakers are banking on getting George next year. Ball would be good fit next to Paul George
Lol this made me laugh out at work.Kobe is going to play Lavar one on one with custody of Lonzo on the line. If Kobe wins (a big if) he can raise Lonzo the right way.
I'm cringing at that video, why would anyone take him at number 2? Never mind what the sports science clown is saying, LOOK at that shot. It actually looks like he's right handed but is shooting from his left side, that's not gonna work. Pick up the dribble with his right, bring it way over to his left, then use his wrist to compensate... nah. Next you're gonna tell Marcus Camby has the same release time as Klay Thompson, who by the way gets way higher on his jump and doesn't need to set.
He better be Derrick Rose on his first step and hop and that first video didn't look like it at all. I don't know how you project Kidd skill and vision at pro level looking at one year of college, which was my point with the other Laker prospect, but fine. I appreciate the effort you put into that post, but a complete difference of opinion. I go with some kid who looks like Kawhi and call it a day I guess.
I don't see what is so great about a lineup that has three guys in it that can't shoot. That's a death knell in the modern NBA.
Wouldna DLo/Ball backcourt be awful defensively? Sure. But they are a young team. I don't like the idea of a terrible team drafting based on projections like that. Who knows what the lineup will look like a year or two or 3 from now.
His shooting and passing being developed definitely makes his floor the highest of the guys left at 2, I agree with that. I don't think he has a high ceiling becauseThat's the case with all of the guys in that draft tier though. Fox can't shoot for shit. Jackson is a questionable shooter in terms of mechanics despite getting hot towards the end of the year and also a bit of a shithead. I think of those three guys Ball has the one elite skill (his vision/passing) that will be the surest bet to translate over to the pros, making him probably the safest pick.
So, I've spent about 45mins going thru the play by plays of the last 2 finals + this year and compiled some data. The parameters are, Curry FGs when the score is within 10, regardless of time left in the game. This a great deal more lenient than the typical clutch rules of 5mins left with 5pt margins. To get this is pretty simple, go to the ESPN play by play pages, expand all the quarters and Ctrl-F "Curry makes" for the makes and "Curry miss" for the misses. Then you just look to the right to see if the margin is correct. I threw this into excel then got the averages. I can upload the data points in a google docs so you all can pick thru if you want.
Curry in the Finals, score within 10:
2015 Curry made 47/103 FGs for 46% from the field
2016 Curry made 37/92 FGs for 40% from the field.
2017 so far? 9/24 FGs for 38% from the field.
These are not good clutch numbers outside of 2015. IMO Finals Curry is a real thing but alas they will likely win anyway so this will all be swept under the rug.
If I am Lebron I want someone better than Channing Frye as my starting Power forward.
His shooting and passing being developed definitely makes his floor the highest of the guys left at 2, I agree with that. I don't think he has a high ceiling because
1. His shot release is broken and could give him major issues if he's being defended by long armed SGs instead of smaller PGs.
2. I doubt his handles will improve much, I can't think of many players who made big strides there.
His shooting and passing being developed definitely makes his floor the highest of the guys left at 2, I agree with that. I don't think he has a high ceiling because
1. His shot release his broken and could give him major issues if he's being defended by long armed SGs instead of smaller PGs.
2. I doubt his handles will improve much, I can't think of many players who made big strides there.