Ninja Scooter
Member
IT, Gordon Heyward, Scoochie Smith for Kyrie. That's Danny's final offer.
I didn't say it was a good deal for either side, just that it's the only way CLE would trade to BOS. There's no way you ship Kyrie to the #1 competitor in your conference, without asking for a king's ransom.
Which is why I previously posted that the two sides might as well not talk at all. I only brought it up because there's talk in Boston media about whether they should trade for him.
a king's ransom
I didn't say it was a good deal for either side, just that it's the only way CLE would trade to BOS. There's no way you ship Kyrie to the #1 competitor in your conference, without asking for a king's ransom.
Which is why I previously posted that the two sides might as well not talk at all. I only brought it up because there's talk in Boston media about whether they should trade for him.
Advanced stats were a mistake.That's a bad trade for the Celtics. IT had a better season than Irving last year according to 82games simple rating (9.5 for IT, 6.8 for Irving), he had a much better box plus/minus (5.4 vs. 2.9), better VORP... Basically every single advanced stat favors IT. Irving is younger and he did hit that one shot in the Finals, but that's not a good trade unless Danny thinks IT's hip is FUBAR.
Agreed, if Koby asked for that at any point he should be fired on the spot because he clearly isn't fit to be a GM.
Advanced stats were a mistake.
Every GM and coach in the league would take Kyrie over IT.
Advanced stats were a mistake.
Every GM and coach in the league would take Kyrie over IT.
Advanced stats were a mistake.
Every GM and coach in the league would take Kyrie over IT.
It means no sane person would choose IT over Kyrie.What does this even mean?
Yup. I thought it was pretty fucking simple.It means no sane person would choose IT over Kyrie.
Yup. I thought it was pretty fucking simple.
k then. You're trying real hard to intellectualise this to make some sort of point but it's not that serious.Then what defines sanity? Would the action of choosing IT over Kyrie qualify one as insane? Because if so thats just using confirmation bias to categorize those that disagree with your oppinion as insane.
This is not evidence nor is it an oppinion supported by fact when presented in this manner.
Greg Monroe, though.
k then. You're trying real hard to intellectualise this to make some sort of point but it's not that serious.
Poster said IT for Kyrie is a bad trade for Boston using advanced stats as justification.
Reality is that Kyrie is better than IT so it's in fact a good trade for Boston so fuck what the stats say.
Follow?
How bout Kyrie & Channing Frye for Melo, Frank Ntilikina, & two 1st Rd picks with top 3 or 5 protections?
Don't worry Dolan, them picks ain't nothing. Ya'll getting Kyrie. Kyrie & Porzingis is like Eastern Playoffs for a couple of years. lol
How many former Knicks players do you want the Cavs to end up with in the Lebron part duex era?
Enough to make Lebron realize
then bails next season to the Lakers or the Spurs, heh.
I follow and i agree with you, but the thing is stats are representative of what has happened. If Kyrie is better then IT then there will be evidence of it. Why not go find it vs calling everyone who disagree's with you insane? Especially when they have presented a well reasoned arguement supported by evidence.
Advanced stats were a mistake.
Every GM and coach in the league would take Kyrie over IT.
Here are one thing that is indisputably insane:
Saying a trade of an expensive bench guy that no team wants, Greg Monroe, plus a pick for Kyrie is a good trade.
Monroe is a mediocre player, at best. And likely will never start full time again in his career.
If Cleveland would take on his awful contract and little to no impact on court purely for picks they wouldn't do so for a team that will not be in the lottery any time soon. They would do so with a team that will be in the lottery or at least likely to be in the lottery.
Monroe has a great contract. Its expiring. Thats a legitimate asset.
Then why have the Bucks been trying to trade him for nearly two years with not a single team wanting him? They have been pretty much trying to give him away.
Nobody wants Greg Monroe.
Brooklyn becoming the dumping ground for bad contracts is amazing
We are back to 2005
Pels have two top 10 players yet can't even be an 8th seed. Ok buddyBoogie was averaging close to 28/11/5 while shooting over 35% from 3 in Sacramento last season. Dude was legit.
Realistically your top 10ish NBA players right now in no specific order are Westbrook Harden Kawhi Durant Boogie Curry Wall Lebron Davis Giannis and Gobert
Pels record will still be bad, they have huge questions at guard/wing and the west is insane.
They signed Crabbe to an offer sheet last year, so they obviously value him.
It wasn't one pick, it was 3 unprotected or minimally protected first round picks.
gibberish, gibberish gibberish...
Milwaukee were trying desperately to trade Monroe because the are a small market team and they handed out a bunch of Bad Contracts over the past few years. Monroe, Henson, Plumblee??? Or was it a Zeller? ect. Point being Milwaukee needed to dump salary to be able to afford to pay Giannis/Jabari/Middleton and have a solid roster. Monroe had the biggest contract and should hypothetically demand the most in return.
Plenty of good players are repeatedly on the trade block. See Rondo/Ray Allen in Boston. Its not that big of a deal. You need to trade good player if you want to recieve good players.
Teams haven't wanted Monroe because while his production is solid to good, his cost vs production ratio isn't that good. He is a large contract at a position that few teams have significant need and where you can find someone that does 80% of what Monroe does for <50% of the cost.
Whats changed is that now Greg Monroe is an expiring contract. Expiring contracts in the NBA have real value since teams only have to worry about the immediate fit and big expiring contracts open up sallary flexibility. If a washed up Kendrick Perkins making 10M a year and a heavily protected first round pick can get a team a young pre RFA Enes Kanter, then Monroe an actually useful NBA player has even more value as an expiring contract.
Is that Pastor from Boston?
I heard Kyrie consulted his mom as well. In addition to being a religious zealot, Kyrie also is letting oedipus complex factor into his decision. What an off season!
I mean
I mean
A lot of religious people go to pastors they trust, then people go to family and close friends
Not strange at all