Crimson_Gold
Member
Would the messages still be there a year after deletion?
Even if they're not, I believe they can be retrieved from the phone company
Would the messages still be there a year after deletion?
Mensch is the gaming side poster who posts a long, speculative E3 dream list, gets one shot in the dark prediction correct, and then coasts on the e-fame to spread FUD for 3 more years.
Even if they're not, I believe they can be retrieved from the phone company
That whole line of thinking "he's a businessman... etc,etc) goes out of the window as soon as this story starts to get more sinister. It's looking less like Trump and co. were the unwitting stooges that were forced into office by circumstance and more like they were active participants in working with hostile forces to get an upper hand in the election. It doesn't get any more polical and calculating than that and tribalism/partisanship can only take you so far. There's going to be a breaking point soon where the rank and file Republican base remembers that they only formed this shaky alliance with the alt-right in the first place to take back power, not hand it over to foreign interests.So, let's say we're some of those people who hand-wave a lot of what's been going on as, "He's just a businessman, not a politician!"
Okay, now this news comes to light.
Isn't it so much more concerning, if not unnerving, that "just a businessman" is playing politics with a counter-intelligence officer of any foreign entity?
....so we've just now confirmed CBOAT's identity?
....so we've just now confirmed CBOAT's identity?
ntkrnl smoked him out
it was a hit!!!!
So, let's say we're some of those people who hand-wave a lot of what's been going on as, "He's just a businessman, not a politician!"
Okay, now this news comes to light.
Isn't it so much more concerning, if not unnerving, that "just a businessman" is playing politics with a counter-intelligence officer of any foreign entity?
Is the next article going to say that they skyped in Putin?
Too many people are underestimating the potential D-wave that will happen in '18. Parties that own the WH typically do bad during midterms, and that's not even taking someone with favorables as shitty as Trump's into account.
Goldstone is highly likely the person the lawyer is referring to, given Jr. Said he was at the meeting on hannity.
I'm hoping they mean emins dad though.
I hope you're right. I still have serious concerns about Democrats turnout in 2018. Not voting for Trump should have been the easiest choice in most people's lives. The man did everything you'd expect from someone who did not want to be in office. Only an idiot would have voted for Trump, I'll repeat this the rest of my life. Yet they did. Then you have Gianforte somehow getting elected. 10 years ago this would not have happened.
As much as I don't want to say it I will. I think until a crisis occurs, Trump fucks up the response, and people are hurt in the process, I don't feel comfortable assuming Democrats will have an easy road. It could be the economy, a national disaster or response to another nation which will make idiots stop being idiots. This Russia stuff will only sour some of his supporters. It's going to take hurting their every day lives for most to turn on him and other Republicans.
I hope you're right. I still have serious concerns about Democrats turnout in 2018. Not voting for Trump should have been the easiest choice in most people's lives. The man did everything you'd expect from someone who did not want to be in office. Only an idiot would have voted for Trump, I'll repeat this the rest of my life. Yet they did. Then you have Gianforte somehow getting elected. 10 years ago this would not have happened.
As much as I don't want to say it I will. I think until a crisis occurs, Trump fucks up the response, and people are hurt in the process, I don't feel comfortable assuming Democrats will have an easy road. It could be the economy, a national disaster or response to another nation which will make idiots stop being idiots. This Russia stuff will only sour some of his supporters. It's going to take hurting their every day lives for most to turn on him and other Republicans.
It's obvious something really incriminated was discussed at this meeting.
Mainly because of how all the trump team and supporters (like stone) were pretty much boasting about how they had something on Clinton after this meeting.
Tomorrow: Don Jr.'s meeting with Russians included a seance to try and contact the ghost of Hitler.
I'm fairly certain that they aren't even attempting to say that it was a meeting about the adoption sanctions anymore and are pretending that they never said that. The new, new explanation is that they were meeting to discuss dirt on Hilary but there was nothing wrong with that because who wouldn't?!?!? And Hilary was dirty... or something.You seriously cannot make this up. I mean get fucked son, you expect us to believe this was a nothing meeting about adoption?
You leftists are just obsessed with this none story! This is the greatest witch hunt in the history of politics!
Former Russian counter-intelligence officer
As Vladimir Putin said, "There is no such thing as a former KGB man".[12] Soon after becoming prime minister of Russia, Putin also perhaps somewhat jokingly claimed that "A group of FSB colleagues dispatched to work undercover in the government has successfully completed its first mission."[9] Moreover, the FSB has formal membership, military discipline, and an extensive network of civilian informants,[13] hardcore ideology, and support of population (60% of Russians trust FSB[14][needs update]), which according to Yevgenia Albats and Catherine A. Fitzpatrick makes it a perfect totalitarian political party.[6
Russian-American lobbyist says he was in Trump sons meeting
A Russian-American lobbyist says he attended a June 2016 meeting with President Donald Trumps son, marking another shift in the account of a discussion that was billed as part of a Russian government effort to help the Republicans White House campaign.
Rinat Akhmetshin confirmed his participation to The Associated Press on Friday. Akhmetshin has been reported to have ties to Russian intelligence agencies, though he denies those links.
While Trump Jr. has confirmed that Russian attorney Natalia Veselnitskaya was in the meeting, he did not disclose Akhmetshins presence. The presidents son has tried to discount the meeting, saying that he did not receive the information he was promised.
Akhmetshin said Trump Jr. asked the attorney for evidence of illicit money flowing to the Democratic National Committee, but Veselnitskaya said she didnt have that information. She said the Trump campaign would need to research it more, and after that Trump Jr. lost interest, according to Akhmetshin.
They couldnt wait for the meeting to end, Akhmetshin said.
https://apnews.com/dceed1008d8f45af...n-lobbyist-says-he-was-in-Trump-son's-meetingAsked about Akhmetshins participation in the meeting, Manafort spokesman Jason Maloni declined comment. A spokesman for Kushner did not respond to inquiries, nor did Trump Jr.s attorney.
Akhmetshin said the attorney brought with her a plastic folder with printed-out documents. He said he was unaware of the content of the documents or whether they were provided by the Russian government, and it was unclear whether she left the materials with the Trump associates.
Akhmetshin said the meeting was not substantive and he actually expected more serious discussion.
I never thought this would be such a big deal to be honest, he told AP.
The presidents son has tried to discount the meeting, saying that he did not receive the information he was promised.
The presidents son has tried to discount the meeting, saying that he did not receive the information he was promised.
Hey, not every prositute is going to be OK with peeing on a bed on tape.The man tried to discount his solicitation of the prostitute, saying that he did not receive the service that he was promised.
I don't usually put much stock in reporters that are only right like 25% of the time.
This isn't complicated. She has some legit sources and some shit sources. Even if we only get info from her good sources 25% of the time it is still worth listening too since other, more verified info might come down the pipeline later on that helps us sort the good info she provides from the bad info, resulting in a helpful connection for understanding what happened. Being skeptical does not mean ignoring information. Take it with a grain of salt.
You leftists are just obsessed with this none story! This is the greatest witch hunt in the history of politics!
Not sure if this was discussed but apparently this meeting came to light because Manafort submitted it on his form back in April and that's how the Senate found out. Kushner didn't list any meetings at first and frantically added 100+ in May as it became apparent he's hiding meetings.
A little bit more evidence that Manafort flipped, Kushner is only adding stuff as he's caught.
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/885882300885602304
Yeah, it's really crazy, but I hope that the inaction from the Republicans over this sinks them for the rest of our lives.
There is no such thing as a former Russian intelligence officer.
That shit's for life.
The issue is that since you can only believe her stories if they are later reported by someone else...then just wait for someone else. Nothing she says can be believed by itself, which means it is not worth listening to. People who post about her stuff just come across as conspiracy theorists with no credibility (and a clear lack of BS filter).
You leftists are just obsessed with this non story! This is the greatest witch hunt in the history of politics!
Garak was right about one thing... A guilty conscience is a small price to pay for the safety of the Alpha quadrant.Right. Garak was loyal to the Obsidian Order even in exile.
What if were getting things mixed up here.
The story says the Russian lawyer brought the counter intelligence officer with her.
But would it not make more sense for the counter-intelligence officer, the guy likely to actually have the dirt, to bring a lawyer with him?
If he was at the time asked to do this by a Russian government official, that would then make the lawyer a "Russian government lawyer".