Elfforkusu
Member
More than pick-and-roll and decent fakes, which actually are fairly well represented in the college game... I think you touched on the problem. Lottery talents like Davis are just too good for the college game to challenge them.Then again, most of Davis' (and all young big men in the NBA ever) issues come down to not knowing how to defend against good fakes and the pick-and-roll. Most college players aren't good at executing pick-and-roll or throwing out decent fakes so Davis (and young big men in general) would still be unprepared for that type of stuff in the NBA. A lot of improving is being challenged and improving at what you get exposed to be bad at and I'm not sure college teams can do that to a lot of great prospects.
It's a function of talent VS number of teams. The NBA has 30 teams or whatever, and yet you still end up with haves and have-nots based on where the superstars land. You could make the case that competitive balance would improve tremendously if they dropped a few teams. The talent pool is too diluted as is.
Now, what happens if you have a smaller pool of talent (because you have guys for a max of 4 years) dispersed across 300+ teams?