UberTag
Member
Just PMed you with one. Feel free to let me know if you're interested.I'm willing to hear trade offers for my #1 pick.
Just PMed you with one. Feel free to let me know if you're interested.I'm willing to hear trade offers for my #1 pick.
Replied to it, sent a counter.Just PMed you with one. Feel free to let me know if you're interested.
Sack penalty is a bit strange. I have never played with one, as far as I know.
I love the Kansas City backfield this season. Own the Charles-Hillis tandem in my 10-team auction league along with Murray, Muscle Hamster and David Wilson in a league where I can play 3 RBs each week.
Actually, I need to post this team because I adore it so much: standard rules, 6 points per passing TD...
QB - Matt Ryan
QB - Russell Wilson (this should look familiar)
RB - DeMarco Murray
RB - Jamaal Charles
RB - Doug "MUSCLE HAMSTER" Martin
RB - Peyton Hillis
RB - David Wilson
WR - Julio Jones (yep, 12 points plus double yardage whenever Matty Ice throws Julio a TD)
WR - Jordy Nelson
WR - Brandon Lloyd
WR - Eric Decker
WR - Kenny Britt
TE - Aaron Hernandez
TE - Jared Cook
D/ST - Buffalo Bills
K - Alex Henery
I'll be doing more rounds later. Decided to take a quick break to map out my plan of attack for tonight's Economy League draft.Also keep the draft analysis coming. I love it. I might give out grades to the best teams drafted if I have more time.
WHOA WHOA WHOA PUDDLES WHAT ARE YOU DOING?Gaucho Guy (Puddles of Win)
Ret Yds points changed from '0.033333333333333' to '0.028571428571429'
6 hours ago
Gaucho Guy (Puddles of Win)
Ret TD points changed from '6' to '4'
WHOA WHOA WHOA PUDDLES WHAT ARE YOU DOING?
Return TDs are such a rare occurrence it seems silly to drop their value to 4 points.WHOA WHOA WHOA PUDDLES WHAT ARE YOU DOING?
They were nerfed already at .03 repeating! Ubertag already posted a list to show it's not as big a deal as you think.That'll be the last rule change. I felt that RBs and WRs who did kick returns were still a bit overpowered.
I guess I could change the TDs back to 6 though.
They were nerfed already at .03 repeating! Ubertag already posted a list to show it's not as big a deal as you think.
and of course I can't find the post..
I don't think it really needed to be changed, 1 point every 33 yards seemed fine. I don't see too many weeks it'll be a major factor. The key is not how much better it makes legit return threats, it's how much it'll make scrubs better. It won't turn fringe WRs who have said duties into must-starts.Do you want it to go back to .3 repeating?
I don't think it really needed to be changed, 1 point every 33 yards seemed fine.
... why? It feels like you're overthinking the scoring at the last second.Okay. I'll change it back.
Btw, touchdowns are now 6.01 points instead of an even 6. QB touchdowns are 4.01.
Ok this is getting silly now. What's with the last second changes? We already have fractional points allowed, you're making it overly complicated Puddles.The Economy League's Scoring and Settings page hurts my head.
6.01 points for TDs instead of 6.
9.99 rushing yards per point instead of 10.
-2.07 points for missing a 20-yard field goal.
... why? It feels like you're overthinking the scoring at the last second.
Ok this is getting silly now.
...Someone has to be the Maverick.
Can't wait for someone to lose a close matchup by 0.01 points because of that extra touchdown hundredth. Just imagine the pandemonium.... why? It feels like you're overthinking the scoring at the last second.
Ok this is getting silly now. What's with the last second changes? We already have fractional points allowed, you're making it overly complicated Puddles.
...
I think I'm going to bow out of the league. I'm sorry but this is getting too silly. When you have this many last-second changes hours before the draft that threatens to mess with alot of mocks.
I'm not going nuclear, I just would've liked some explanation like "Okay here's a reason blah blah blah"/formula/etc.. If you made this stuff weeks ago I wouldn't mind at all, but seven hours before the draft? It seems... flighty.*Sigh*
All changes will be reverted. Don't go nuclear.
I'm not going nuclear, I just would've liked some explanation like "Okay here's a reason blah blah blah"/formula/etc.. If you made this stuff weeks ago I wouldn't mind at all, but seven hours before the draft?
Look you're the commish, but is there a reason you're making everything so fractional? I don't get it.
Aha, here is the post from Crazymoogle (wrong guy)The return yards were a genuine concern of mine, but I've reverted them to the previous settings.
Now that was with it being 25 yards a point. Trust me, you have little to worry about.This is always the controversial issue because:
a) it's basically never covered by any draft guide
b) it's basically never standard in any popular league system
c) it can do some wonky things to player values.
However! If we adjust last season based on 0.04pts/yard (25yds = 1pt), the following emerges:
RBs:
#2. Darren Sproles: +43pts (RB7 -> RB4)
#3. Leon Washington: +43pts (unused -> RB45)
#4. Joe McKnight: +43pts (unused -> RB46)
#23. Dexter McCluster: +28pts (RB39 -> RB33)
WRs:
#6. Josh Cribbs: +39pts (WR54 -> WR27)
#7. Randall Cobb: +37pts (WR85 -> WR52)
#12. Ted Ginn Jr.: +32pts (still mostly useless)
#15. Devin Hester: +28pts (becomes WR52)
#27. Percy Harvin: +21pts (WR7 -> WR5)
The long and short of it is that Sproles and Harvin both get significant stock jumps, but nobody becomes overpowering based on yardage, and it adds a few guys into the receiver and RB pool. At best, +40 means an extra 2.5pts/week. And some of these guys shown here will either not play as much this year or get moved up to full time receiving, at which point returns might not happen as much. Harvin and Sproles are a sort of special breed.
The other factor to consider is within the kickoff rules last year, there were more touchbacks, further limiting ridiculous return games.
So I think I'm okay with it. Doesn't change the rules nearly as much as I thought it would.
The additional little wrinkle is that certain sites will differ on just which players will be taking on return roles and which ones won't be.Now that was with it being 25 yards a point. Trust me, you have little to worry about.
You're not rewarding 1st place enough and overvaluing 3rd/4th a bit. There should be a clearer value decline IMHO.Okay so here's another crack at the prize money split:
420
320
200
100
I'd really like to leave it at this. There are 16 people in this league. Only 4 are getting something. It makes no sense to de-value 2nd, 3rd and 4th place based on the reasons for starting the league in the first place! (No Quitters, in case anyone forgot lol)
Should I start MJD (still listed as a "third down back" by the head coach) or Stevan Ridley for Week 1? = P
By that logic the whole season is luck, but alot of it isn't. Grabbing the right waiver picks. The right FAs. Usually you can tell the lucky ones from the guys who pound the beat for good picks also. Alot of research goes into that and to not really reward that seems... bleh.I like the prize money split as it is. The championship match is such luck anyways after all the work (and luck) to get there.
I'm in Frankman's camp on this but without a clear vote on the pot distribution between 4 people having been presented it's kind of hard to gauge a consensus.By that logic the whole season is luck, but alot of it isn't. Grabbing the right waiver picks. The right FAs. Usually you can tell the lucky ones from the guys who pound the beat for good picks also. Alot of research goes into that and to not really reward that seems... bleh.
I just don't get how 1st doesn't even get 45% though. $1040 total pot here, and I don't see people quitting because of the pot. People will quit if their team isn't doing well; then you say "Don't come back next year!"
Only 5 people are in my camp, 2 against and the rest haven't said anything. So yeah, can't really make a case w/o more opinions. :CI'm in Frankman's camp on this but without a clear vote on the pot distribution between 4 people having been presented it's kind of hard to gauge a consensus.
I did. Mulled it over. Decided the price was too rich for me. Quite happy drafting from the 4th slot.Only 5 people are in my camp, 2 against and the rest haven't said anything. So yeah, can't really make a case w/o more opinions. :C
BTW Ubertag did you get my counteroffer for your Trade Proposal?
That's standard practice and I say that as the guy who finished 4th last season and made a profit.On the Frankman side of this with the prize amount. More to 1st. 4th gets their money back in most of my leagues and thats it.
I just don't get how 1st doesn't even get 45% though. $1040 total pot here, and I don't see people quitting because of the pot. People will quit if their team isn't doing well; then you say "Don't come back next year!"
Shanahan will call out one depth chart today.Looks like someone got a steal in the last few rounds yesterday. Royster seems to be the Redskins starter. You never know how long that lasts with Uncle Shanny though lol
It's fine, I just don't understand why anyone would mail it in. You shell out $65 bucks for a 4 month commitment... it seems weird to me.
Shanahan will call out one depth chart today.
Another on game day.
Name a 3rd guy the starter an hour before kickoff.
And then give 25 carries to some undrafted free agent they signed off the street.
And then repeat the whole process the next week.
Draft a Redskins RB and you'll NEVER be able to count on anything.
Make sure you don't police my lineup when I elect to start 2012's Jackie Battle in my lineup and he's got a piss-poor projection on Yahoo! because they're too slow on the uptake.Oh I agree but I remember having to police the lineups of some bottom-feeder teams on gamedays late last year even though the fee was $50 back then -_-
Interesting. Adding Eddie Royal pushed me to a 7-6 projection. He didn't play much in preseason but if he's healthy he will have a Sproles-type impact in that offense as a slot reciever. Also, I imagine he will return punts fulltime....