www.pcgamesn.com
What AMD do best when talking GPU
What AMD do best when talking GPU
Why? I thought the things that hamper console equivalent GPUs were access to the hardware, so any equivalent hardware doesn't perform that much better than the consoles.
Why not? XSX GPU is, in theory, already more powerful than PS5 GPU.
Because idiots listen like "went in one ear and out the other" and then saying like a true rumor
"an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and a Radeon RX 7600 in one single chip."
It's RTX 4070MaxQ performance. What's bullshit about that??
Interesting? I can understand bandwidth issues given the fact some of the cache maybe utilized by the CPU or GPU unless these APUs come equipped with stacked memory,but why wouldn't AMD want these lower APUs to replace relatively low-end dedicated GPUs?
And runs 100000000000000000000000000000000x more programs.
Maybe because those APU's have custom stuff not licensed by Sony and MS to other machines.
Is not the XSX APU 56 CU?
I'm talking about strix halo. The subject of the thread.
Because a dedicated GPU simply becomes more viable once you reach those price segments. The lowest end of dedicated GPUs will match that overly expensive APU in need of ridiculous cooling and space.
It's not horrible at all. We went from absolute joke of Jaguar cores to Zen 2 cores which perform so much better in every regard. Current-gen consoles seem despite this "outdated" CPU be primarily bottlenecked by GPU regardless. Consoles really don't need super beefy CPUs cores. That's more a PC thing and when you aim for higher than 60 frames per second. If consoles were choked by their CPUs, we would see more games running at native 4K rather than upscaled from 1080p using some muddy FSR solution that DF will surely gush over.
I watch his videos regularly, I enjoy some of his guests but man dude struggles to hide his AMD boner.
What I mean is how is 40 cu beefy if the XSX has 56?
Well Sony/MS can't really put in CPU cores that doesn't exist at the time. And I believe Mark Cerny talked about the CPU performance of PS5 once. He said he offered more CPU cores to devs but it would come at the cost of GPU. All the devs immediately said no, realizing GPU performance had to be prioritized. And the proof is in the pudding. You see how resolution targets are gradually lowered as this gen goes on. We went from 1440p baseline to 1080p and now some games even go below that. This is the biggest sign that developers are hitting GPU bottleneck first.
Because it's the only mass market apu from amd for PCs with 40 cus. The 780m is 12 cu for comparison. Laptops using this thing will be very performant with a relatively slim form factor.
It's all about the Benjamin sadly
For PCs only? What is forbidding anyone to use it on non PC machines?
What is forbidding you from cutting a steak with a spoon? Sometimes things are designed with a specific use case in mind, but you can use it in other ways if you really want.
