It`s good to be rich i guess. Nice monitors.
You hardly have to be rich to afford a $1200 monitor >.<
It`s good to be rich i guess. Nice monitors.
It`s good to be rich i guess. Nice monitors.
For the monitor use case, more processing is worse, not better. If there's some processing to be done, the PC can do that better, in a more controlled and customizable fashion, and with lower latency.Better processing
I'd wait for reviews on that, there's nothing stopping this monitor from competing really well in terms of IQ with most (non-OLED) TVs.
We just talked about that on the previous page. It's not like you need to drive every game at 144 FPS to greatly benefit from G-sync with up to 144 Hz.The problem with these ultra high end monitors is that only ultra high-end gear can actually drive them. Even SLI 1080 won't manage to properly drive that at 4K 144Hz for the vast majority of games. So people that can afford to drop that much on gear can probably drop that much on monitors as well.
For the monitor use case, more processing is worse, not better. If there's some processing to be done, the PC can do that better, in a more controlled and customizable fashion, and with lower latency.
I'd wait for reviews on that, there's nothing stopping this monitor from competing really well in terms of IQ with most (non-OLED) TVs.
We just talked about that on the previous page. It's not like you need to drive every game at 144 FPS to greatly benefit from G-sync with up to 144 Hz.
I'm sticking with my VG248QE w/ G-Sync module for a while longer I guess.
I'm sorry, that's bullshit. DSR offers high-quality downsampling.I really wish NVidia came up with proper upscaling/downscaling techniques. It's really sad when the PS4 Pro can output significantly better IQ to my 1080P TV with 1800p checkerboarding than my PC can with 4K downsampling.
I'm sorry, that's bullshit. DSR offers high-quality downsampling.
Your post said 4k downsampling. That is just wrong, any way you slice it.Maybe I'm doing it wrong. Maybe my smoothness factor is off...but I always manage to end up with pretty noticeable artifacting or blurriness when downsampling 1440p to 1080p.
I wonder why the Asus has these super ugly fat bezels and the Acer has far slimmer ones. They are worse than the ones on my current XB270hu even. Both are very competitive in the "fugly gam0r stand" area thoIt's worth noting that Acer will also have a G-SYNC HDR monitor using the same panel, which we created with AUO: http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/nvidia-g-sync-hdr-announced-at-ces-2017
The specs on that monitor are amazing but it's ugly as sin. My PC doesn't have the juice to run anything on it anyways. Maybe one day!
I have been looking at this one though: http://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell...6dg/apd/210-agjr/monitors-monitor-accessories
Is it a decent one? I like the simple look of it too.
The specs on that monitor are amazing but it's ugly as sin. My PC doesn't have the juice to run anything on it anyways. Maybe one day!
I have been looking at this one though: http://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell...6dg/apd/210-agjr/monitors-monitor-accessories
Is it a decent one? I like the simple look of it too.
It's worth noting that Acer will also have a G-SYNC HDR monitor using the same panel, which we created with AUO: http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/nvidia-g-sync-hdr-announced-at-ces-2017
I have one of those and it's great. Slightly worse color that an IPS but better than most TNsThis is the one I have. Incredible monitor, worth every penny. The average uninformed poster likes to poo poo about it being a TN panel. After a quick color calibration, the color rivals that of an IPS, with a fast response time and none of that IPS-lottery backlight bleed BS.
There's a model from a Chinese manufacture that seems to be close to the same thing, 100Hz and FreeSync, just a much lower price ($700).
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Perfect-M34...826050?hash=item33bfe59442:g:gucAAOSwA3dYDb0e
Impressions that I've read on reddit seem to be positive.
I'm an informed poster and I'll still poo poo about it being a TN panelThis is the one I have. Incredible monitor, worth every penny. The average uninformed poster likes to poo poo about it being a TN panel. After a quick color calibration, the color rivals that of an IPS, with a fast response time and none of that IPS-lottery backlight bleed BS.
Well I was gonna buy this Dell Ultrawide:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00PXYRMPE/?tag=neogaf0e-20
But now I'd like to see how that HP Omen does.
The specs on that monitor are amazing but it's ugly as sin. My PC doesn't have the juice to run anything on it anyways. Maybe one day!
I have been looking at this one though: http://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell...6dg/apd/210-agjr/monitors-monitor-accessories
Is it a decent one? I like the simple look of it too.
I'm an informed poster and I'll still poo poo about it being a TN panel![]()
Even if your colors are perfect in the center they won't be towards the sides or top/bottom. That's just the nature of the technology.
It's worth noting that Acer will also have a G-SYNC HDR monitor using the same panel, which we created with AUO: http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/nvidia-g-sync-hdr-announced-at-ces-2017
I really want an ultrawide monitor and the omen looks fantastic. But the 4K ASUS and Acer monitors just seem too good to pass up. only $1200 for this tech?! Only downside is that I wish they were 32" panels.
That's a pretty big "only" if you're used to or want a bigger screen tho. Giving up several inches of real estate is not a trivial matter.
Welp 4K had a good run, Dell's 8K monitor laughs at your dual GTX 1080s: http://www.theverge.com/2017/1/5/14098224/dell-up3218k-8k-computer-monitor-price-features-ces-2017. Only $5000.
My biggest issue is that none of the UW have HDR right? :3
Feels kinda waste to not purchase HDR and spend a lot of money on a monitor but I reeaaaaallly want ultra wide :3
NEW NEWS!
ASUS PG27UQ
3840 x 2160 on 27"
144 Hz G-sync
HDR with 1,000cd/m² maximum brightness and 384 zone local dimming backlight
Quantum dot IPS panel with DCI-P3 color space
$1199
Holy crap!
Bought the Dell a week or so ago after obsessive deliberation. As far as I know, you can't get better at that pricepoint. Takes only a few seconds of fiddling with the settings. It's not at all kitschy.
This is the one I have. Incredible monitor, worth every penny. The average uninformed poster likes to poo poo about it being a TN panel. After a quick color calibration, the color rivals that of an IPS, with a fast response time and none of that IPS-lottery backlight bleed BS.
I have this. It's fantastic, as most Dell premium monitors are.
This is a good monitor and the Gsync performance is excellent.
BUT the colors are exactly what you get in any TN panel; washed out when compared to an IPS display. This is no exception. I sent it back in favor of the 60Hz 34" ultrawide screen.
Welp 4K had a good run, Dell's 8K monitor laughs at your dual GTX 1080s: http://www.theverge.com/2017/1/5/14098224/dell-up3218k-8k-computer-monitor-price-features-ces-2017. Only $5000.
I'm so split on the issue, maybe I'll just get the Omen :3Without the right screen tech, HDR doesn't mean anything anyway. Considering HDR is a new and unproven thing in the PC space with little to no game support, it should hardly be anyone's "biggest issue".
Durante, why no Asus ProArt PA32U goodness in the OP?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzazvYy9eD0
Durante, why no Asus ProArt PA32U goodness in the OP?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzazvYy9eD0
HDMI 2.1 didn't do nothing... it only travel the data between GPU and monitor... in case it can travel variable refresh rate.So with the HDMI 2.1 announcement is G Sync actually worthwhile still? Will HDMI 2.1 do everything G Sync does or is it only similar in supporting VRR?
Jesus that asus has me sweating. I'm fully expecting ~$1800 though. That's a LOT of new features to the market.
$1200Jesus that asus has me sweating. I'm fully expecting ~$1800 though. That's a LOT of new features to the market.