Support NeoGAF

[Sybrix]

WOW.

It only took them 15 fucking years to figure out that everyone wants this in the game.

Fucking morons.

I wonder why 2042 was a complete crock of shite?!

Here's to the 2024 defenders, how you doing down their fellas?!

 

[tr1p1ex]

I'm getting Donkey Kong BAnanza instead to satisfy my destruction urges.

 

[poppabk]

Thats not bad company level, its much better. People still wearing rose tinted glasses when talking about BC2

This looks cooler for sure. But BC2 destruction was game altering in MP, from terrain deformation to even allowing objectives to be completed through destruction in Rush (although they had to scale this back slightly for balance). For Conquest you could alert how easy or hard it was to capture or defend a point based on judicious destruction, in rush you could completely change the maps dynamic.

 

[Parazels]

I'm a lot more interested in seeing what happens when you hit the building again...and again.

In Bad Company 2 such building were collapsing, burying everyone inside.

 

[nnytk]

Cannot wait, played a ton of BF 2042 and loved it, rush mode with the boys.

 

[fatmarco]

So they're finally building something greater than the tech we had in 2008? Is this really what we've come to?

It's amazing to think that in the 360/PS3 gen we were imagining all that would be possible with all the power we'd get in the next generation and into the future.

Now we beg merely to have equivalence with the destruction in 17 year old games.

 

[flying_sq]

I'm pumped that they're taking Dev influence from the community, but I still trust that the next BF game will release in a terrible state, then get fixed over 3 to 5 years just in time for a new one to be released. Would love to be proven wrong though

 

[mitch1971]

In Bad Company 2 such building were collapsing, burying everyone inside.

I know. Hence the urge to see repeat hits on the new BF buildings. If it's just one hit and done, then it's not exactly destructable.

 

[Frostt]

Vince we trust you