twinturbo2
butthurt Heat fan
I expected $150 USD on the 32 GB card, tbh.Nonoriri said:Memory card 4GB ¥2,200
Memory card 8GB ¥3,200
Memory card 16GB ¥5,500
Memory card 32GB ¥9,500
:<
I expected $150 USD on the 32 GB card, tbh.Nonoriri said:Memory card 4GB ¥2,200
Memory card 8GB ¥3,200
Memory card 16GB ¥5,500
Memory card 32GB ¥9,500
:<
All the announcements so far haven't dimmed my interest. I hope they say something about the system being region-free.Deadly Monk said:They still haven't confirmed if it's region free yet
It's also very likely to be a lot faster than the cheapest micro-sd cards. Probably more fair to compare it to class 10. (And it's still overpriced, but less so)zomgbbqftw said:I'm surprised by the amount of faux rage on the Vita memory card prices. This wasn't exactly surprising, proprietary memory on a much cheaper than expected device was always going to be more expensive than the cheapest form of memory.
StuBurns said:What are you talking about? Video and music? Meh.
You believe most users will spend 95% of their PSV time on that stuff seriously?UncleSporky said:Yes, exactly. Nobody cares about downloading games, demos, trailers, PSN in general, none of that. Unimportant in this day and age!
mclem said:I'm failing to read this paragraph as anything other than "Who buys a freaking handheld system for handheld games?". Anyone able to help me out here?
Bad_Boy said:i paid 100 dollars for 1gb when psp came out.
i know, i know...
Raelson said:You could see the language options at the conference when he first booted it up. You couldn't see that English was there but I'd of course assume so.
gofreak said:Battery is a 2200mAh unit, cited as giving 3-5 hours of gameplay or 5 hours of video playback.
gofreak said:Charging time is 2 hours, 40 minutes.
That wasn't my statement, but you misrepresented the utility of having non-cart general storage. It's used for far more things than video and music (which are indeed still important).StuBurns said:You believe most users will spend 95% of their PSV time on that stuff seriously?
sounds like 3DS lol.Londa said:hahaha oh man... why make it a portable?
so basically 3 hours? LOL
3 hours of play, more more hours to charge. XDDD
mclem said:I'm failing to read this paragraph as anything other than "Who buys a freaking handheld system for handheld games?". Anyone able to help me out here?
it automatically makes the Vita more expensive.zomgbbqftw said:I'm surprised by the amount of faux rage on the Vita memory card prices. This wasn't exactly surprising, proprietary memory on a much cheaper than expected device was always going to be more expensive than the cheapest form of memory. Anyway, I think the core $249 pack will be limited and a value pack with screen protector and 4GB card will be sold at $269. Just like PSP really...
3DS gets around 3 hours on max everything running Zelda.DMPrince said:sounds like 3DS lol.
Durante said:It's also very likely to be a lot faster than the cheapest micro-sd cards. Probably more fair to compare it to class 10. (And it's still overpriced, but less so)
Do you, or do you not believe people will spend 95% of their time on non-game cart activities on their PSVs?UncleSporky said:That wasn't my statement, but you misrepresented the utility of having non-cart general storage. It's used for far more things than video and music (which are indeed still important).
Bad_Boy said:i paid 100 dollars for 1gb when psp came out.
i know, i know...
darkside31337 said:Get what? Sony lost out on tons of money by shipping their system with a hard drive built in and then on top of that not selling their own hard drive only like their direct competitor did.
To be honest they're being pretty smart about this. Sell the unit at a relatively low price while recouping that money on accessories.
Nonoriri said:Memory card 4GB ¥2,200
Memory card 8GB ¥3,200
Memory card 16GB ¥5,500
Memory card 32GB ¥9,500
:<
balladofwindfishes said:it automatically makes the Vita more expensive.
A 4gb card holds 2 games...
Sony could have easily adopted the SD format and threw in a cheap 4gb SD card for free, and the Vita would have been seen as a great value.
But they didn't. Instead they chose to nickle and dime consumers, which tends to push off sales unless your product is ultra-popular already (which a PSP without Monster Hunter is not).
3DS gets around 3 hours on max everything running Zelda.
The Vita looks like with similar settings it will have to work to get half of that.
It depends on the person. Do they love downloadable games and essentially spend all their time playing them?StuBurns said:Do you, or do you not believe people will spend 95% of their time on non-game cart activities on their PSVs?
1-D_FTW said:No. I'm saying who wants to play Uncharted games on your handheld? A vocal minority. A game like Sound Shapes is much more in-line with what people want out of their handhelds. And, at least in the west, the system will succeed or fail on how good that segment of the market is. Not on second string handoffs and console ports.
I used hyperbole ironically because I was responding to a post that did.UncleSporky said:It depends on the person. Do they love downloadable games and essentially spend all their time playing them?
Do you or do you not believe that video and music are the only use for non-cart storage?
Can somebody clear this up for me?Pazuzu9 said:Hang on... the big one is how they're gonna sell games at retail? That was bound to be proprietary. It's the equivalent of a UMD, NGC (for DS), etc.TTP said:Why did they go for a proprietary format for the big one I don't understand.
And it's the smaller one (that could easily have been a MicroSD or M2) that they're dicking us over with? That's the one you need to buy to have storage for PSN games, saves, basically everything the Duo did in a PSP...
But then Wiki says it's the bigger NVG card that will have variable capacities?
WTF? I'm confused.
There is no indication that Vita is only going to provide an hour and a half of playtime, though.balladofwindfishes said:3DS gets around 3 hours on max everything running Zelda.
The Vita looks like with similar settings it will have to work to get half of that.
mik83kuu said:ITT: People who expected 8+ hours battery life get mad.
Pazuzu9 said:Can somebody clear this up for me?
How could you know this? It says 3-5 hours which presumably means that 3 is the minimum with everything on + playing a game.balladofwindfishes said:3DS gets around 3 hours on max everything running Zelda.
The Vita looks like with similar settings it will have to work to get half of that.
Occasionally I do that as well, but the thing is that there are actually people who will spend 95% of their time playing downloaded games. Downloaded games are of high enough quality now that this is not an unreasonable assertion. It's not total hyperbole.StuBurns said:I used hyperbole ironically because I was responding to a post that did.
If they allow you to remote play PS3 games on the go via wifi or something I'll do a backflip. Fuuuuck I'm hyped.gembel said:looks like you can remote to your PS3
THE-Pink-Dagger said:I dont understand the question, it is a proprietary format, ONE format, as far as I know, there aren't two different types of cards for the Vita.
Pazuzu9 said:
I'm talking about the one second from left... or it's that just some bullshit shoop?
it's 3-5 running at all defaults (medium brightness, no WiFi, medium sized game). This we know from the press release.Angry Fork said:How could you know this? It says 3-5 hours which presumably means that 3 is the minimum with everything on + playing a game.
caliblue15 said:What sucks is that we can't even get an extended battery to put in the device.... It'll always be 3 hours of gaming, which isn't very long for roadtrips.
THE-Pink-Dagger said:Always funny to see people dissatisfied with some aspects of a console (like 3DS) and saying "I'll wait for the next version", why are you assuming that there'll be a Vita 2.0 with a better battery, this is it right there, won't be another version hum, or a light one, without any better battery.
dark10x said:There is no indication that Vita is only going to provide an hour and a half of playtime, though.
It's not like running Zelda is a big feat for the 3DS either. It doesn't even match a first generation Gamecube title visually and isn't using online functionality. How will it perform running Monster Hunter using wi-fi? That's the more important question.
Angry Fork said:How could you know this? It says 3-5 hours which presumably means that 3 is the minimum with everything on + playing a game.
DaSorcerer7 said:how many revisions did the psp have again?