Gamer @ Heart
Member
Ydahs said:Wait, the camera's resolution is only 640x480? Did we already know this?
Yeah. First tech sheet from the reveal i believe.
Ydahs said:Wait, the camera's resolution is only 640x480? Did we already know this?
If your talking about PSN games and MMO's it would still make them optional. Your basic Vita retail game will beable to save on the cart.Aselith said:No, it's not because some games require it to save which would render them unplayable if you didn't have it.
Linkzg said:the thing is, there is hardly a reason to have a memory card for the 3DS. The inclusion was wholly unnecessary since it has internal memory and there was nothing to download at the time, and a few small things to download now.
every Vita game is getting a digital and retail release. it seemed like the online store was important to the vita, without taking Suite, PSP and PSN games into account.
that's what makes it supremely boneheaded. Sony is hurting themselves with this.
Yep they cut corners where they could to reach 249. They probably figured they dont need better if 3DS doesn't.Ydahs said:Wait, the camera's resolution is only 640x480? Did we already know this?
googleplex said:If your talking about PSN games and MMO's it would still make them optional. Your basic Vita retail game will beable to save on the cart.
Linkzg said:the thing is, there is hardly a reason to have a memory card for the 3DS. The inclusion was wholly unnecessary since it has internal memory and there was nothing to download at the time, and a few small things to download now.
every Vita game is getting a digital and retail release. it seemed like the online store was important to the vita, without taking Suite, PSP and PSN games into account.
that's what makes it supremely boneheaded. Sony is hurting themselves with this.
PantyPhantom said:So you're saying the hardware is about the same value in 3DS and the Vita?
My god, many times more powerful new technology is more expensive. That simply can't be.
Yes because being able to see beyond what I want and look at the situation logically is pledging my undying love for Sony.OrangeGrayBlue said:Please, tell me, how is your life better by pledging allegiance to a company?
A press release states some games will REQUIRE a memory stick. No matter how you want to spin it you'll need to buy a memory card with Vita on Day 1.googleplex said:If your talking about PSN games and MMO's it would still make them optional. Your basic Vita retail game will beable to save on the cart.
If that is what you think is happening, you're really deluding yourself.googleplex said:Yes because being able to see beyond what I want and look at the situation logically is pledging my undying love for Sony.
SMH.
I guess you misunderstood me. Obviously new technology is more expensive. That has nothing to do with subjectivity.zoukka said:Value is completely subjective. If the Vita doesn't offer something unique compared to the 3DS lineup, it will look really bad lookin at the prices.
No, I don't.NateDrake said:A press release states some games will REQUIRE a memory stick. No matter how you want to spin it you'll need to buy a memory card with Vita on Day 1.
Some PS Vita software titles may require
NateDrake said:A press release states some games will REQUIRE a memory stick. No matter how you want to spin it you'll need to buy a memory card with Vita on Day 1 to play all games available.
It costs less than twice as much but is over 10 times more powerful. That's how I see it, though it may not be the mass market perspectiveThoraxes said:Ok, I know prices will maybe be slightly cheaper in America, but to get what the 3DS offers in a singular box, (System, Charging Dock, 2GB SD card, 4GB is Vita baseline though), it'll cost about $315 or so on the Vita?
gogogow said:Terrible battery size/life. But I understand why they did this. To cut costs of course. But it's NOT removable, you are stuck forever with this shitty battery. I was still hoping they would put a bigger battery in there, because the Vita can't be opened like the iPad, so they can make a battery the size of the Vita.
And wow at the prices. I always knew the proprietary memory cards are gonna be more expensive, like twice as expensive, but this is like 4-5 the price of SD cards.
Gonna skip the Vita for now till a price cut and more games are announced that i'm interested in, there's like only 1 game I want now.
I'm keeping an eye on Katamari, and I hope it's not a shoddy port of the iOS game. It's one of the few games where dual sticks, accelerometer, or touch controls can all be equally functional.gofreak said:A closer glimpse at one of the conference slides with pics of Katamari and NGSigma.
I guess we'll get more on all these separately. Would like to see how Katamari plays with all the various input options, might be an opportunity for them to do something interesting.
BladeoftheImmortal said:These prices look amazing. 130 for 32gbs. shit, last time i bought a mem stick pro duo it was 150 for a gig.
gofreak said:A closer glimpse at one of the conference slides with pics of Katamari and NGSigma.
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/9/2011/09/ps_vita_titles.jpg[/IMG
I guess we'll get more on all these separately. Would like to see how Katamari plays with all the various input options, might be an opportunity for them to do something interesting.[/QUOTE]
That is a PS3 NGS screenshot........
[IMG]http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/article/751/751774/ninja-gaiden-sigma-20061219064603244_640w.jpg
antonz said:Yep they cut corners where they could to reach 249. They probably figured they dont need better if 3DS doesn't.
BladeoftheImmortal said:These prices look amazing. 130 for 32gbs. shit, last time i bought a mem stick pro duo it was 150 for a gig.
OldJadedGamer said:And again, gamers have been bitching about this for 6 years... why wouldn't They complain now?
Opus Angelorum said:So because of potential piracy (through the use of SD) the consumer is forced to buy expensive proprietary media.
Yep, that's Sony.
Gamer @ Heart said:Will the outcry be as heavy as the 3DS battery situation, or less because we are coming off the PSP and kinda sorta expected this?
I know that's what's happening. And I'm sure you could see it if you removed Nintendo's nut sack from your forehead.ShockingAlberto said:If that is what you think is happening, you're really deluding yourself.
PantyPhantom said:I guess you misunderstood me. Obviously new technology is more expensive. That has nothing to do with subjectivity.
No, I don't.
Will and may doesn't mean the same.
Opus Angelorum said:So because of potential piracy (through the use of SD) the consumer is forced to buy expensive proprietary media.
googleplex said:Yes because being able to see beyond what I want and look at the situation logically is pledging my undying love for Sony.
SMH.
-Twisting facts (or being unaware of them) to soften the blow against this memory card pricing. The add-on is not mandatory for ANY game. Memory cards, for some games, are.+ 10-15 for a ugly second analog attachment?
-Unnecessary insultAnd the 3ds hardware would still be shit in comparison to the Vita.
-The reason for $120 32GB memory cards is because Sony is dedicated to offering the consumer bleeding edge technology?It's more like Sony still wants to offer you bleeding edge technology, but this time they want to maintain a healthy software AND hardware business.
-Again, twisting facts. That add-on is optional in the same way Sixaxis motion controls are on PS3. A memory card is optional for playing PSVita games in the way a left thumb is.The memory card is also optional. So what's your point?
Infinite Justice said:if its 50 bucks for the 16gb i would possibly bite along with the wifi version.
maybe.
Of course I'd have to buy a memory card for that. It's not mandatory since I don't have to buy games online, I can just play games on the carts. Nevertheless I will be buying a memory card for the Vita.guek said:but what if you ever want to buy something for digital download?
googleplex said:I know that's what's happening. And I'm sure you could see it if you removed Nintendo's nut sack from your forehead.
Do I want to pay high prices for memory cards? Nope!
Can I understand why Sony is pricing them the way they are ? Yes, I can understant wanting to maintain a solvent business model.
Did any one with half a brain I see this coming a mile away? How the Hell could anyone not expect this?
Ah, ad-hominem attacks.googleplex said:I know that's what's happening. And I'm sure you could see it if you removed Nintendo's nut sack from your forehead.
matrix-cat said:Isn't 2200mAh absolutely gigantic? My original PSP's battery broke a few years ago and I fell down the awful rabbit hole of the third-party battery market (long story short: they're all fake, don't believe anything), and 2200mAh is what the original PSP's Stamina Battery was rated at. The one that would make a phatty last 8+ hours and a 2000 about 11 hours. The Vita must be an absolute hog to chew through one in three.
Some part of me knew that there was no chance of good news for the Vita's battery, but I had to actually see it in a press release. Even though I expected it I kind of feel like cancelling my pre-order. I know there probably won't be another handheld that outlasts it but I still really hate seeing an empty battery warning light all the time.
Those aren't insults, those are statements of fact.OrangeGrayBlue said:This includes several insults toward Nintendo (hardware is shit, ugly add-on)
OrangeGrayBlue said:edit- He's banned?! All in vain
ShockingAlberto said:Ah, ad-hominem attacks.
The last refuge of the slow-witted.
gogogow said:That is a PS3 NGS screenshot........
PantyPhantom said:Of course I'd have to buy a memory card for that. It's not mandatory since I don't have to buy games online, I can just play games on the carts. Nevertheless I will be buying a memory card for the Vita.
What if I'd like to drive to work but I only have a bicycle. I'd have to buy a car. The principle is basically the same.
PantyPhantom said:I guess you misunderstood me. Obviously new technology is more expensive. That has nothing to do with subjectivity.
No, I don't.
Will and may doesn't mean the same.
Nope. I'd still have my bicycle and I would get to work without buying a car same as in you don't have to buy the memory card. You don't get it do you?guek said:wait, wut. by that logic, sony could price the vita at $1000 and you could say "well if you want to play vita games, you'll have to buy a vita. Principle's essentially the same."
Full functionality? Please explain. From what we have heard/read you DON'T need a memory card but it MIGHT be necessary for some games. That's all we know.In that same vein, nothing is really "mandatory." It's not mandatory that I buy more games for the 3DS, the AR games are already there! It's not mandatory that you buy a Vita at all, but if you do and you wanna get full functionality out of it, the $250 price tag is a bit misleading. That's what people are upset about.
How the hell can you know that? Shed some light please.Aselith said:Get real. They meant that some games may not require it not that there is a possibility that none will. It means that they don't have to require it. It's still mandatory for some games and most definitely mandatory for PSN exclusives.
Source?Gravijah said:There are going to be PSN exclusive Vita games. If you want to play them, you are required to have a memory card.
PantyPhantom said:Nope. I'd still have my bicycle and I would get to work without buying a car same as in you don't have to buy the memory card. You don't get it do you?
jackdoe said:Yep. Highest brightness with WiFi still on (too lazy to turn it off haha) will lead to sub 3 hour play times.