• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

New York City Approves Large Sugary Drinks Ban

Status
Not open for further replies.

Godslay

Banned
Meanwhile in Mexico :


Result :

coke-j314.jpeg

So you are telling me that 3 liters of soda is going to turn me into a fat Mexican?

You changed the picture didn't you...
 

Angry Fork

Member
Anyone complaining about the "douchebaggery" of Bloomberg must have conveniently evacuated from their brain any traces of the last few mayors we had.

If anything all the negative response goes to show that people are a bunch of fucking nimrods.

Bloomberg is a piece of shit idiot bordering on the evil because of the NYPD stuff alone. I really wish/hope he'd be replaced as well as a dramatic changes to how NYPD operates.
 

Parallacs

Member
Honestly, I'm a pretty thin guy but seeing a movie with a 16 oz soda is ridiculous. Am I supposed to leave the movie three times during the movie to get more soda? Also, people typically go to movies once a week. I doubt the theatres are what is causing people to get fat.

I can't wait to see all the headaches this will cause. The theatres make most of their money on concessions and their biggest sellers are popcorn and large sodas. It will be like a mini-Prohibition: people will be smuggling large sodas into theatres.

Anyways, bans such as these have been done before and with the exception of cigarettes, get overturned with the justice system or voter supported propositions. You can encourage people to do the right thing and limit sweets but you can't force them to.
 

njean777

Member
Is part of the "root cause" not intake of ridiculous amounts of calories from soda by drinking it in excess?

Sounds more like that and less of a "scapegoat" as you put it.




Out of curiosity, how does it really hurt society (sans slippery slope argument)?

Umm it takes away your choices. The root cause is our education system and how it does not educate and instill lasting values in children. They teach about healthy eating (very little btw) then when you look at the lunch menus it is full of pizza, tacos, chicken nuggets, chips, etc. Now granted you can get a salad, but school food tastes so bad and is really cheap that I do not trust that salad to be fresh. We don't make our kids workout everyday as they should in school during PE, and PE should be mandatory all throughout school k-12, with very few exceptions. (medical condition or if a person is in athletics.) There is a huge problem in our school systems when I myself had to go and figure out what foods are bad, why they are bad, how to read labels, how much I should workout, the proper way to workout, I mean I had to do all of this myself, why? (not complaining just showing an example) Because our school system which is in place to teach me things never taught me any of this stuff.

I am from Texas so in our school system you only had to participate in PE until 10th grade. Even then you could sit around and be lazy during PE. If you are not in football they could give a rats ass what you are doing during PE.

It may seem like brainwashing, but this brainwashing is something that will help them to live a longer healthier life, without taking their choice away of eating or drinking what they want.
 

Monocle

Member
I hope this measure helps to reduce obesity. I understand the nanny state concerns and everything, but really, improbably huge soda sizes are an option that impoverished fat people could do without.

As the article says, consumers' choices aren't limited by the restrictions since people can buy as many smaller drinks as they want. So this ban is more like a speed bump that encourages you to ask yourself whether you really need to pour more than 16 oz of fizzy sugar down your throat with one meal.
 
I wonder how many people in this thread actually understand who this "ban" is directed it at and whether or not they realize how many calories can be guzzled down in seconds...




A losing battle, that is not being fought?
Semantics. The ban pertains to beverages and that's how it'll be perceived. If the public feels they're being short-changed and coddled, they're going to respond negatively. It's a losing battle. Even if it sticks, it's not going to have the desired effect. GAF's single-minded support of this ban is bizarre, given its collective tendency towards drug legalization. Fuck the "One is certifiably dangerous" argument - you're not going to kill someone behind the wheel hopped up on pop.
 

Javaman

Member
Will it really though? What's to stop someone who would've gotten a large from just getting a second medium?
Most resturaunts have free refills and to-go cups anyways so people will still drink to their fill without having to buy another cup.
 

Derrick01

Banned
I know the mayor is trying to help but enacting such a law only hurts society. People should be able to buy what they want. Government shouldn't dictate what people want to consume.

I agree mostly but when it gets to the point where the majority of the nation becomes obese and diabetic they have to find ways to fix it. Drastic ways. Because when these people who are stomping around demanding to be allowed to do what they want collapse from a heart attack or get diabetes all of a sudden they're going to want their evil government to take care of them. And we have to front the bill for a lot of that, and we can't afford it as more and more people become so unhealthy.
 
V

Vilix

Unconfirmed Member
I'm opening up a Big Gulp speak easy on Broadway and 86th. When you see Vinny just say "alkaloids".
 

Dude Abides

Banned
Semantics. The ban pertains to beverages and that's how it'll be perceived. If the public feels they're being short-changed and coddled, they're going to respond negatively. It's a losing battle. Even if it sticks, it's not going to have the desired effect. GAF's single-minded support of this ban is bizarre, given its collective tendency towards drug legalization. Fuck the "One is certifiably dangerous" argument - you're not going to kill someone behind the wheel hopped up on pop.

Actually it won't be perceived that way, because people will still see 16-ounce cups available. This is just like the smoking ban, a bunch of overwrought outrage over nothing.
 

Forceatowulf

G***n S**n*bi
So what's next, New York, you gonna put a ban limit on red meats next? How about you ban Sundae's and milkshakes. It's all bad for your health, I mean fuck it why not?
 

Arksy

Member
I always thought of America as a place where people fought for their civil liberties and praised them to the nth degree, but it seems that every liberty that wasn't covered in the bill of rights has been taken away or limited. Holy crap. Whatever happened to personal responsibility?
 

hey_it's_that_dog

benevolent sexism
People lacking self control ruining it for everyone.

Self-control plays an important role, but it's not the only factor. Framing it as a matter of self-control implies that people know they are drinking soda in excess and failing to resist doing so. I'm sure this is the case some of the time.

But I'd also argue that given the normality of huge ass soft-drinks, people's perceptions of how much is excessive are completely distorted. People don't even know they should be trying to resist, so self-control doesn't enter into in such cases.

I have mixed feelings about this ban, but one benefit is that it sends a clearer message about norms. "Soda servings of this size are not healthy, they are excessive." The people who don't care can order more sodas. Some people will genuinely realize they should drink less soda. It's an empirical question how big an effect on public health it all amounts to in the end. I hope someone is measuring it carefully.
 

Godslay

Banned
I hope this measure helps to reduce obesity. I understand the nanny state concerns and everything, but really, improbably huge soda sizes are an option that impoverished fat people could do without.

As the article says, consumers' choices aren't limited by the ban since people can buy as many smaller drinks as they want. So this ban is more like a speed bump that encourages you to ask yourself whether you really need to pour more than 16 oz of fizzy sugar down your throat with one meal.

It's not just soda that makes people fat, I'd wager that this will do little to cut down on obesity at all. It seems like just about everything today has some form of hfcs or sugar in it. In addition to that plenty of people have piss poor diets, combined with very little or no exercise and you have an obesity epidemic. Soda is just a small part of the problem.
 

FStop7

Banned
Tests show serving someone on smaller dishes also leads to them eating less overall, even though no one's stopping them from just getting a second dish. Just a psychology thing.

It's true. I've been doing this experiment on myself for the past 3 weeks. Even though I'm fully aware of it it still works.

That said, I have really mixed feelings about that law.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Congratulations on being a nanny state! Up next: bad language, chocolate, gasoline, uneducational toys and anything spicy.
 

Derrick01

Banned
I always thought of America as a place where people fought for their civil liberties and praised them to the nth degree, but it seems that every liberty that wasn't covered in the bill of rights has been taken away or limited. Holy crap. Whatever happened to personal responsibility?

People got lazy and fat and started dying prematurely so the govt. had to step in and try to fix it for them.
 

Gray Man

Banned
This is awful, Im a healthy person and all, but the best way to make prople healthier, is to educate them, get them to go running etc.

This is just an overreach of power.
 

Joates

Banned
Semantics. The ban pertains to beverages and that's how it'll be perceived. If the public feels they're being short-changed and coddled, they're going to respond negatively. It's a losing battle. Even if it sticks, it's not going to have the desired effect. GAF's single-minded support of this ban is bizarre, given its collective tendency towards drug legalization. Fuck the "One is certifiably dangerous" argument - you're not going to kill someone behind the wheel hopped up on pop.

Comparing this soda "ban" to drugs is one hell of a terrible analogy.

When the government starts letting us by schedule 1 drugs even in the smallest amounts legally, come back with that argument.

And something tells me people will only complain long enough for the straw to make it to their gaping maw.
 

winter

Member
Semantics. The ban pertains to beverages and that's how it'll be perceived. If the public feels they're being short-changed and coddled, they're going to respond negatively. It's a losing battle. Even if it sticks, it's not going to have the desired effect. GAF's single-minded support of this ban is bizarre, given its collective tendency towards drug legalization. Fuck the "One is certifiably dangerous" argument - you're not going to kill someone behind the wheel hopped up on pop.

Agreed. I consider myself liberal and this is the dumbest fucking legislation I've ever heard. I'm very much against the drug war and believe the government shouldn't be regulating what people put in their bodies. Why shouldn't an alcohol ban logically follow this? Certainly an alcohol ban would have a quicker and more direct effect on loves saved.
 

DBT85

Member
Better solution? Legislate the maximum price of a 20oz bottle of water to 50 cents. Give consumers a cheaper, healthy option.

Great idea. Sadly the same companies campaigning to sell these bottles of coke are the same ones that sell bottled water. So they'll protest even more.

Bottled water was one of the fastest growing areas for the likes of Coke et al before 2008. It backed of a smidge but it's picked up again iirc.

Thread title is misleading though, Soda isn't banned, just the large bottles at certain outlets. You are still going to be able to buy a 3l bottle in the supermarket.
 

dokish

Banned
If you want people to not drink soda then educate them on how many calories are in a 20 oz and how much sugar they are drinking and what the affects are of doing so

Do you REEEEEALLY think that today, 2012, the fat americans that stuff their faces with McDonalds and Burger King do it because they simple don't know how many calories and sugar they are ingesting? REALLY?

The world has been telling that this shit is bad for you for at least 5 years.
 
I understand the non smoking policy because of second hand smoke, but dietary restrictions seems absurd.

If someone wants to eat themselves to death, and aren't harming anyone else, then by all means.
 

hey_it's_that_dog

benevolent sexism
Wait, does that read 1.9l? What the fuck? Why would you need a drink that large? On second thought, how can you even drink something that large?

Doesn't matter if I want that much or even if I can drink that much because that's the best bargain! I get the most soda for the least cost per ounce! I just throw the rest away! Waste rules!!!

Government regulates soda: YAY
Government regulates drugs: STUPID WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY

In the case of soda the probability of successful enforcement is much higher. It's also disingenuous to act like there aren't nuanced differences between different regulation tactics.

Ban soda but let everyone eat chese burgers and pizza till they explode, great plan.

A cheese burger or a pizza is a meal. It's not the healthiest meal, but it provides sustenance. Soda is sugar and water and is nearly worthless as a "food."

That's why it's not necessarily hypocritical to treat one unhealthy consumable differently than another.
 
Just because you hate Bloomberg because of his stance on guns doesn't mean anyone else gives a shit. Most of the silly outrage is coming from people who won't be affected by this in any way.
Look just because you want the Bloomberg Nanny State...and surveillance state, doesn't mean others do. People like being able to exercise their own free will, even if you don't.


That's great.
 

Dude Abides

Banned
Look just because you want the Bloomberg Nanny State...and surveillance state, doesn't mean others do. People like being able to exercise their own free will, even if you don't.

Cliches like Nanny State are a poor substitute for an actual argument, and particularly ironic coming from someone in favor of drug prohibition. People are still free to buy as much soda as they like. The only restriction is on the size of the container.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
Government regulates soda: YAY
Government regulates drugs: STUPID WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY

I think most of us who are fine with this have also said (or heavily implied) that government regulation of drugs is/would be a good thing, but that having drug usage be illegal is a bad thing. I would be outraged if this was a law saying that you are not allowed to drink that much soda.
 

Joates

Banned
Look just because you want the Bloomberg Nanny State...and surveillance state, doesn't mean others do. People like being able to exercise their own free will, even if you don't.

What free will was taken away?


And on this front, why the fuck should there be speed limits on the roads, I dont care how fast you want to go, I want to be able to drive as fast as I fucking want without the nanny state telling me how fast is appropriate.
 
In the less than ten times a year I actually drink soda, sometimes I want a lot of soda. I don't want to pay more for it on the very few times I actually indulge myself.
 

Sixfortyfive

He who pursues two rabbits gets two rabbits.
Most "medium" sized drinks at fast food places don't even fit in my car's cup-holder anymore.

Can't say I can find a reason to be upset at this sort of law, honestly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom