Meanwhile in Mexico :
Result :
So you are telling me that 3 liters of soda is going to turn me into a fat Mexican?
You changed the picture didn't you...
Meanwhile in Mexico :
Result :
Anyone complaining about the "douchebaggery" of Bloomberg must have conveniently evacuated from their brain any traces of the last few mayors we had.
If anything all the negative response goes to show that people are a bunch of fucking nimrods.
Is part of the "root cause" not intake of ridiculous amounts of calories from soda by drinking it in excess?
Sounds more like that and less of a "scapegoat" as you put it.
Out of curiosity, how does it really hurt society (sans slippery slope argument)?
YeahReally? Has it been driving him nuts?
Semantics. The ban pertains to beverages and that's how it'll be perceived. If the public feels they're being short-changed and coddled, they're going to respond negatively. It's a losing battle. Even if it sticks, it's not going to have the desired effect. GAF's single-minded support of this ban is bizarre, given its collective tendency towards drug legalization. Fuck the "One is certifiably dangerous" argument - you're not going to kill someone behind the wheel hopped up on pop.I wonder how many people in this thread actually understand who this "ban" is directed it at and whether or not they realize how many calories can be guzzled down in seconds...
A losing battle, that is not being fought?
Most resturaunts have free refills and to-go cups anyways so people will still drink to their fill without having to buy another cup.Will it really though? What's to stop someone who would've gotten a large from just getting a second medium?
I know the mayor is trying to help but enacting such a law only hurts society. People should be able to buy what they want. Government shouldn't dictate what people want to consume.
Semantics. The ban pertains to beverages and that's how it'll be perceived. If the public feels they're being short-changed and coddled, they're going to respond negatively. It's a losing battle. Even if it sticks, it's not going to have the desired effect. GAF's single-minded support of this ban is bizarre, given its collective tendency towards drug legalization. Fuck the "One is certifiably dangerous" argument - you're not going to kill someone behind the wheel hopped up on pop.
THE SODA MUST FLOW!!
Actually it won't be perceived that way, because people will still see 16-ounce cups available. This is just like the smoking ban, a bunch of overwrought outrage over nothing.
People lacking self control ruining it for everyone.
I hope this measure helps to reduce obesity. I understand the nanny state concerns and everything, but really, improbably huge soda sizes are an option that impoverished fat people could do without.
As the article says, consumers' choices aren't limited by the ban since people can buy as many smaller drinks as they want. So this ban is more like a speed bump that encourages you to ask yourself whether you really need to pour more than 16 oz of fizzy sugar down your throat with one meal.
Tests show serving someone on smaller dishes also leads to them eating less overall, even though no one's stopping them from just getting a second dish. Just a psychology thing.
Just because you want Bloombergs Nanny State doesn't mean people who don't are upset about nothing.
I always thought of America as a place where people fought for their civil liberties and praised them to the nth degree, but it seems that every liberty that wasn't covered in the bill of rights has been taken away or limited. Holy crap. Whatever happened to personal responsibility?
Will it really though? What's to stop someone who would've gotten a large from just getting a second medium?
Semantics. The ban pertains to beverages and that's how it'll be perceived. If the public feels they're being short-changed and coddled, they're going to respond negatively. It's a losing battle. Even if it sticks, it's not going to have the desired effect. GAF's single-minded support of this ban is bizarre, given its collective tendency towards drug legalization. Fuck the "One is certifiably dangerous" argument - you're not going to kill someone behind the wheel hopped up on pop.
Jon Stewart/Daily Show - http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-may-31-2012/drink-different
Great segment
Semantics. The ban pertains to beverages and that's how it'll be perceived. If the public feels they're being short-changed and coddled, they're going to respond negatively. It's a losing battle. Even if it sticks, it's not going to have the desired effect. GAF's single-minded support of this ban is bizarre, given its collective tendency towards drug legalization. Fuck the "One is certifiably dangerous" argument - you're not going to kill someone behind the wheel hopped up on pop.
Better solution? Legislate the maximum price of a 20oz bottle of water to 50 cents. Give consumers a cheaper, healthy option.
If you want people to not drink soda then educate them on how many calories are in a 20 oz and how much sugar they are drinking and what the affects are of doing so
Wait, does that read 1.9l? What the fuck? Why would you need a drink that large? On second thought, how can you even drink something that large?
Government regulates soda: YAY
Government regulates drugs: STUPID WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY
Ban soda but let everyone eat chese burgers and pizza till they explode, great plan.
Yeah he nailed it. Here's part 2:That was amazing.
Look just because you want the Bloomberg Nanny State...and surveillance state, doesn't mean others do. People like being able to exercise their own free will, even if you don't.Just because you hate Bloomberg because of his stance on guns doesn't mean anyone else gives a shit. Most of the silly outrage is coming from people who won't be affected by this in any way.
Yeah he nailed it. Here's part 2:
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-may-31-2012/drink-different---pick-your-poison
Government regulates soda: YAY
Government regulates drugs: STUPID WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY
Look just because you want the Bloomberg Nanny State...and surveillance state, doesn't mean others do. People like being able to exercise their own free will, even if you don't.
Government regulates soda: YAY
Government regulates drugs: STUPID WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY
Look just because you want the Bloomberg Nanny State...and surveillance state, doesn't mean others do. People like being able to exercise their own free will, even if you don't.
Cliches like Nanny State are a poor substitute for an actual argument.
This is so stupid...
Education, EDUCATION is what people need! and healthy job conditions!