splattered
Member
X Series S 399 4tf
Swtich Pro 399 4tf
PS5 499 9tf
PS5 Pro 599 13tf
X Series X 599 12tf
By this logic you forgot the X Series X Pro 16TF for 599 haha
X Series S 399 4tf
Swtich Pro 399 4tf
PS5 499 9tf
PS5 Pro 599 13tf
X Series X 599 12tf
I've never heard such nonsense in my lifeI'm sure the TF difference will be between 3 and 4 if the 56 CU vs. 36 CU difference exists.
And Sony is spending the money trying to achieve high clocks to be more competitive. They'll get poorer yields than MS. You guys know that AMD's current flagship card, the 5700 XT, will operate slightly above 1800 MHz (in a well cooled test setup) while gaming?
![]()
So, if Sony is trying to get Navi based APU to run way higher than that in a console it'll be expensive. And remember, the 5700 XT is using the highest binned Navi 10 parts in it's flagship card while console parts cannot be binned.
You got a link to it?Sony has vr. Vr has less latency and higher framerate with dual gpu according to nvidia....![]()
Marketing?4TF difference...same price?
where did Sony spend that money?
This hurts my brain
I'm guessing because we cant benchmark xbox one console and conclude real architecture gains on averageI agree with you that it's at least 52 CUs, but your math doesn't add up there.
6.5X1.25=8.125
8.125÷1.4=5.8
That's obviously inferior ... Sony made the 4k claim for ps4 pro and the 10800 60fps claim for ps4.
Microsoft has done a much better job of achieving what they said rather than Sonys blatant lies. .. the liar here is Sony that is not in debate.
Sony has claimed 8k for ps5 ... good luck with that.
Marketing?
At Xbox Need only Twitter![]()
I'm pretty sure Phil wasn't talking about VCR Xbox that Microsoft doesn't even make anymore. One S = 1.4 tflopsI'm guessing because we cant benchmark xbox one console and conclude real architecture gains on average.
8x xbox one (1.2TF) = 9.6 TF
According to digital foundry article Navi is around 30% faster compared to polaris (xbox x), but GCN tahiti (xbox one) was even slower (and especially in games / scenes with tessellation), so in the end Navi should be around 50% faster compared to GCN tahiti.
To all the people who get hyped about the sheer number of likes on a social media platform: I hope you guys know that this is not any real metric of how well or bad a product will sell in the end. Especially since posts like these are most likely to be targeted adds on social media or are even supported with enormous advertisement campaigns that are running allongside and outiside of the specific target platform. One brand having more popularity than another doesent equel in more revenue or lifetime sales. It just means that in culture or even pop culutre this brand has a higher popularity. Or why dont we all run around in Gucci and Prada clothes? Or why dont we all drive a Tesla?. A product still needs to have various other factors in place for someone to start having a desire to own it and in the end deciding to buy it. The number of likes on a social media post are only one factor influencing this desire and decision to buy a specific product.
To me this just means the brand is more popular in generel or it has better targeted marketing. Or perhaps a higher budget was spend for marketing expaneses during that month. Also the PS5 logo reveal was made on CES which is to my knowledge by far a biger event then the game awards. So its only obvious a tweet timed with the CES has more impressions and interactions then one that was done after the game awards. This needs to be taken into account. But hey lets just all continue to make sales forecasts based on the popularity of a brand or posts on social media. That's like trying to forecast the weather by measuring the size of our hands. There is so much fanboyism in this thread that sometimes I feel the utmost desire to unsub it already.
The Game Awards received over 45 million live streams.CES has more impressions and interactions then one that was done after the game awards.
I feel much more knowledgeable about this things now, thank you for the time you spent to bring some light into this matters, you can unsub it now.To all the people who get hyped about the sheer number of likes on a social media platform: I hope you guys know that this is not any real metric of how well or bad a product will sell in the end. Especially since posts like these are most likely to be targeted adds on social media or are even supported with enormous advertisement campaigns that are running allongside and outiside of the specific target platform. One brand having more popularity than another doesent equel in more revenue or lifetime sales. It just means that in culture or even pop culutre this brand has a higher popularity. Or why dont we all run around in Gucci and Prada clothes? Or why dont we all drive a Tesla?. A product still needs to have various other factors in place for someone to start having a desire to own it and in the end deciding to buy it. The number of likes on a social media post are only one factor influencing this desire and decision to buy a specific product.
To me this just means the brand is more popular in generel or it has better targeted marketing. Or perhaps a higher budget was spend for marketing expaneses during that month. Also the PS5 logo reveal was made on CES which is to my knowledge by far a biger event then the game awards. So its only obvious a tweet timed with the CES has more impressions and interactions then one that was done after the game awards. This needs to be taken into account. But hey lets just all continue to make sales forecasts based on the popularity of a brand or posts on social media. That's like trying to forecast the weather by measuring the size of our hands. There is so much fanboyism in this thread that sometimes I feel the utmost desire to unsub it already.
I think the craze around a friggin logo is hilarious, but it has more to do with how the PS5 garnered more attention with a single logo in spite of the XSX getting more "favorable" attention and Microsoft hyping up their next console.To all the people who get hyped about the sheer number of likes on a social media platform: I hope you guys know that this is not any real metric of how well or bad a product will sell in the end. Especially since posts like these are most likely to be targeted adds on social media or are even supported with enormous advertisement campaigns that are running allongside and outiside of the specific target platform. One brand having more popularity than another doesent equel in more revenue or lifetime sales. It just means that in culture or even pop culutre this brand has a higher popularity. Or why dont we all run around in Gucci and Prada clothes? Or why dont we all drive a Tesla?. A product still needs to have various other factors in place for someone to start having a desire to own it and in the end deciding to buy it. The number of likes on a social media post are only one factor influencing this desire and decision to buy a specific product.
To me this just means the brand is more popular in generel or it has better targeted marketing. Or perhaps a higher budget was spend for marketing expaneses during that month. Also the PS5 logo reveal was made on CES which is to my knowledge by far a biger event then the game awards. So its only obvious a tweet timed with the CES has more impressions and interactions then one that was done after the game awards. This needs to be taken into account. But hey lets just all continue to make sales forecasts based on the popularity of a brand or posts on social media. That's like trying to forecast the weather by measuring the size of our hands. There is so much fanboyism in this thread that sometimes I feel the utmost desire to unsub it already.
5/10To all the people who get hyped about the sheer number of likes on a social media platform: I hope you guys know that this is not any real metric of how well or bad a product will sell in the end. Especially since posts like these are most likely to be targeted adds on social media or are even supported with enormous advertisement campaigns that are running allongside and outiside of the specific target platform. One brand having more popularity than another doesent equel in more revenue or lifetime sales. It just means that in culture or even pop culutre this brand has a higher popularity. Or why dont we all run around in Gucci and Prada clothes? Or why dont we all drive a Tesla?. A product still needs to have various other factors in place for someone to start having a desire to own it and in the end deciding to buy it. The number of likes on a social media post are only one factor influencing this desire and decision to buy a specific product.
To me this just means the brand is more popular in generel or it has better targeted marketing. Or perhaps a higher budget was spend for marketing expaneses during that month. Also the PS5 logo reveal was made on CES which is to my knowledge by far a biger event then the game awards. So its only obvious a tweet timed with the CES has more impressions and interactions then one that was done after the game awards. This needs to be taken into account. But hey lets just all continue to make sales forecasts based on the popularity of a brand or posts on social media. That's like trying to forecast the weather by measuring the size of our hands. There is so much fanboyism in this thread that sometimes I feel the utmost desire to unsub it already.
I see you're feeling generous.5/10
106 m.
5 of PS5.I see you're feeling generous.
Phil Spencer: "we will not be out of position on power or price"
GAF:
![]()
He's saying Scarlett will cost and perform similar to the PS5.
No more, no less.
So kind of you let everyone know your intentions.I probably made more enemies with that one post of mine then the guy trying to convince us sony is lying about RT.
Lol you sure about that? I think Times running out brother
Phil was talking carefully pre-written marketing speech that leaves as much as possible room for interpretation. And if it turns out to be related to VCR Xbox - you have zero chance to argue against.I'm pretty sure Phil wasn't talking about VCR Xbox that Microsoft doesn't even make anymore. One S = 1.4 tflops
AMD said Navi is GCN X 1.25
My predictions:
- Both will be $499.
- No Lockhart at launch, Sparkman SOC is mainly for XCloud blades running XSX games at 1080p for streaming.
- PS5: 8.5 TF (36CU@1850MHz)
- XSX: 12.5 TF (56CU@1750MHz)
A certain user told me that the "negative" press about the PS5 has gained a lot of "steam" and the fact that Sony hasn't said anything means they're hiding underpowered specs. How has the market responded, thus far?
![]()
Search - MarketWatch
Search MarketWatch for the latest financial news and market data.www.marketwatch.com
Around a 1.5% increase as of 12:45? Wait, I thought the "negative" press had a lot of "steam".
My predictions:
- Both will be $499.
- No Lockhart at launch, Sparkman SOC is mainly for XCloud blades running XSX games at 1080p for streaming.
- PS5: 8.5 TF (36CU@1850MHz)
- XSX: 12.5 TF (56CU@1750MHz)
Armchair analysis with bias strikes again.A certain user told me that the "negative" press about the PS5 has gained a lot of "steam" and the fact that Sony hasn't said anything means they're hiding underpowered specs. How has the market responded, thus far?
![]()
Search - MarketWatch
Search MarketWatch for the latest financial news and market data.www.marketwatch.com
Around a 1.5% increase as of 12:45? Wait, I thought the "negative" press had a lot of "steam".
Also Phil Spencer: "we will not be out of position on power or price"
Matt comment on ERA:
ManaByte reaction:
![]()
Matt's a fanboy people only pay attention to because he sucked up enough to be a mod.
I'm hesitant to say even this, but: the systems obviously aren't exactly the same, but as of now they are close enough that I expect ancillary considerations like preferred controller or online environment to be bigger deciding factors than whatever slight performance differences might exist.
Again, this isn't PS4 vs. XBO or Pro vs. X. Your game experience will be the same on either platform, and any fanboy arguments will be even more petty and ridiculous than they already are now.
They are very close to each other. This isn't like PS4 vs. XBO.
It literally doesn't matter.
Anyone investing emotional weight or faith in being fans of "the most powerful console" is going to have a bad time.
They will both be great machines. It really doesn't matter.
Ok, last post:
I don't know which console will be "stronger," and don't really care to be honest. Don't get me wrong, the whole process is fascinating, and I love exploring why certain decisions are made, but the end result is really neither here nor there. One will be more powerful, and I'll purchase third party games on whatever system that is. But I will buy both of them on Day 1, and I'm sure I'll enjoy them both very much.
But, as I have stated before, since the X came out that has been my main platform (save for exclusives on PS and PC, and a fair bit of Switch as well), and, back against the wall, I expect that trend to continue for the foreseeable future.
Nintendo will never chase "power" again, but as mobile chipsets get better and better I still expect lots of beautiful and fun games to come from them.
Featuring pass-through like the XBox One is a natural expectation.So I know those renders that AMD showed of the Series X are not real, but how likely is it actually that it might actually be the case the Series X has support for multiple tvs or monitors? What do you all think?
Reading Matt's comments, I was looking for the fanboy parts but dont seem to find any.He's a great fanboy as you can tell by these comments:
If you want more please do tell.
Do you mind quoting the posts that he comes across as being a fanboy?Matt's a fanboy people only pay attention to because he sucked up enough to be a mod.
Disagreement isReading Matt's comments, I was looking for the fanboy parts but dont seem to find any.
What exactly is Manabyte on about calling Matt a fanboy?
Highly unlikely. Either Devs are forced to support multi monitor stuff, which just isn't happening for many devs on console, or the console keeps power permanently in reserve to use the 2nd monitor of other OS things and Apps, keeping power away from games like the One did for PIP stuff, which wasn't great and it got rid of years ago.So I know those renders that AMD showed of the Series X are not real, but how likely is it actually that it might actually be the case the Series X has support for multiple tvs or monitors? What do you all think?
Reading Matt's comments, I was looking for the fanboy parts but dont seem to find any.
What exactly is Manabyte on about calling Matt a fanboy?
He is not saying Xbox is stronger so he is definitely a fanboy.Do you mind quoting the posts that he comes across as being a fanboy?
Highly unlikely. Either Devs are forced to support multi monitor stuff, which just isn't happening for many devs on console, or the console keeps power permanently in reserve to use the 2nd monitor of other OS things and Apps, keeping power away from games like the One did for PIP stuff, which wasn't great and it got rid of years ago.
Yep just seen his post history. Yikes.He is not saying Xbox is stronger so he is definitely a fanboy.
To all the people who get hyped about the sheer number of likes on a social media platform: I hope you guys know that this is not any real metric of how well or bad a product will sell in the end. Especially since posts like these are most likely to be targeted adds on social media or are even supported with enormous advertisement campaigns that are running allongside and outiside of the specific target platform. One brand having more popularity than another doesent equel in more revenue or lifetime sales. It just means that in culture or even pop culutre this brand has a higher popularity. Or why dont we all run around in Gucci and Prada clothes? Or why dont we all drive a Tesla?. A product still needs to have various other factors in place for someone to start having a desire to own it and in the end deciding to buy it. The number of likes on a social media post are only one factor influencing this desire and decision to buy a specific product.
To me this just means the brand is more popular in generel or it has better targeted marketing. Or perhaps a higher budget was spend for marketing expaneses during that month. Also the PS5 logo reveal was made on CES which is to my knowledge by far a biger event then the game awards. So its only obvious a tweet timed with the CES has more impressions and interactions then one that was done after the game awards. This needs to be taken into account. But hey lets just all continue to make sales forecasts based on the popularity of a brand or posts on social media. That's like trying to forecast the weather by measuring the size of our hands. There is so much fanboyism in this thread that sometimes I feel the utmost desire to unsub it already.
those laughing at people discussing it clearly have no idea what they are talking about.
Matt is a solid source, but he no longer works in gaming so his info is all second hand.
Matt said that if he had to make an educated guess, he would guess that Xbox would come up stronger.He is not saying Xbox is stronger so he is definitely a fanboy.
![]()
You really can't tell we are taking the PiS5 here can you?To all the people who get hyped about the sheer number of likes on a social media platform: I hope you guys know that this is not any real metric of how well or bad a product will sell in the end. Especially since posts like these are most likely to be targeted adds on social media or are even supported with enormous advertisement campaigns that are running allongside and outiside of the specific target platform. One brand having more popularity than another doesent equel in more revenue or lifetime sales. It just means that in culture or even pop culutre this brand has a higher popularity. Or why dont we all run around in Gucci and Prada clothes? Or why dont we all drive a Tesla?. A product still needs to have various other factors in place for someone to start having a desire to own it and in the end deciding to buy it. The number of likes on a social media post are only one factor influencing this desire and decision to buy a specific product.
To me this just means the brand is more popular in generel or it has better targeted marketing. Or perhaps a higher budget was spend for marketing expaneses during that month. Also the PS5 logo reveal was made on CES which is to my knowledge by far a biger event then the game awards. So its only obvious a tweet timed with the CES has more impressions and interactions then one that was done after the game awards. This needs to be taken into account. But hey lets just all continue to make sales forecasts based on the popularity of a brand or posts on social media. That's like trying to forecast the weather by measuring the size of our hands. There is so much fanboyism in this thread that sometimes I feel the utmost desire to unsub it already.
Matt said that if he had to make an educated guess, he would guess that Xbox would come up stronger.
To me it felt like they are so close in specs, he expects microsoft to upclock their chip to overtake the PS5 teraflop number.