yacobod said:Who do you think will actually pull down the 2nd seed in the NFC? the 49ers or the Saints?
I honestly don't like either of those choices, but it's probably gonna be the 49ers.
yacobod said:Who do you think will actually pull down the 2nd seed in the NFC? the 49ers or the Saints?
yacobod said:man i was just looking, the giants stretch run is pretty brutal
@ NE - W
@ SF
vs PHIL
@ NO
vs GB
@ DAL
it's possible that they lose all the remaining games. i personally don't think they will, but it wouldn't be out of the question. if you come out of that 6 game stretch 4-2, i'd be ecstatic, and even 3-3 wouldn't be bad.
yacobod said:man i was just looking, the giants stretch run is pretty brutal
@ NE - W
@ SF
vs PHIL
@ NO
vs GB
@ DAL
it's possible that they lose all the remaining games. i personally don't think they will, but it wouldn't be out of the question. if you come out of that 6 game stretch 4-2, i'd be ecstatic, and even 3-3 wouldn't be bad.
yacobod said:Who do you think will actually pull down the 2nd seed in the NFC? the 49ers or the Saints?
yacobod said:man i was just looking, the giants stretch run is pretty brutal
@ NE - W
@ SF
vs PHIL
@ NO
vs GB
@ DAL
it's possible that they lose all the remaining games. i personally don't think they will, but it wouldn't be out of the question. if you come out of that 6 game stretch 4-2, i'd be ecstatic, and even 3-3 wouldn't be bad.
This is the funny 'criticism' that people have. He's throwing very little, so that must mean he sucks. And even if so, we're 7-1 with a 3 point OT loss.eznark said:I would too if Smith were my quarterback. Harbaugh really has no faith in Smith whatsoever. He is 33rd in the league in attempts (ahead of only Gabbert). Part of that is the excellent defense allows them to grind the ball but man, have they had to throw their way into a game yet? They scored early in the 4th in that Detroit game, right? I don't remember.
I think they get destroyed by a team like the Saints in the first round of the playoffs with that formula.
It's a bit hyperbolic, but he's right, he is COMPLETELY different. You just had to have known how he was before, and how he performed (outside of the stats).eznark said:This isn't meant to say the 49ers are bad or anything, but it flies in the face of FMT's assertion that Alex Smith is somehow a born again quarterback. He's simply been removed from the game plan.
LOL.LevelNth said:We are one position away from being a completely dominant dynasty IMO.
LevelNth said:We are one position away from being a completely dominant dynasty IMO.
Look it sounds ridiculous I know, and I don't mean winning everything all the time, but ALWAYS in the hunt, ALWAYS in the playoffs.DeaconKnowledge said:Wow.
eznark said:Looking at the NFC standings, that Bears win was pretty huge for the rest of the league. Shitty teams like Atlanta, Tampa, Washington, Dallas and obviously Philly all kind of needed the Bears to lose that game. 8 games in and I don't see the NFC playoff picture changing at all through the rest of the year.
Rack it?
If balance = best, you're a poor man's Ravens. They have a better quarterback, better receivers and a comparable running attack. They've played a tougher schedule (significantly so) and are much deeper.LevelNth said:Now that doesn't mean that we're a lock to win the Super Bowl or anything, but I would make an argument with anyone that we have one of, if not the best overall team in the NFL. Unfortunately, we do not have one of the elite's at the most important position in the game, and that hurts.
LevelNth said:We are one position away from being a completely dominant dynasty IMO.
yacobod said:the eagles had a hard enough time covering the worst skilled position players in the nfl last night, how in the world were they going to defend the best skilled position players in GB?
LOL.
Not much of a favorite, doesn't the home team usually get 3 points just for playing at home?Futurevoid said:Niners/Giants line is up. Niners favored by 3.5.
I like it better when we're underdogs coming into these games.
Alex had to throw quite a bit during that comeback against Philly.eznark said:Part of that is the excellent defense allows them to grind the ball but man, have they had to throw their way into a game yet?
XiaNaphryz said:Not much of a favorite, doesn't the home team usually get 3 points just for playing at home?
XiaNaphryz said:Not much of a favorite, doesn't the home team usually get 3 points just for playing at home?
I think our receivers and D are better, but it's an argument to be made.eznark said:If balance = best, you're a poor man's Ravens. They have a better quarterback, better receivers and a comparable running attack. They've played a tougher schedule (significantly so) and are much deeper.
This is my favorite thing anyone has ever written on this board. 49ers haven't had a winning season in 7 years and suddenly they are on the cusp of being a dominant dynasty. Too good!
The unlikely win in New England and the The Eagles loss last night really helped give the Giants a cushion. We could literally win the remaining division games and win the East. All the while while losing the other 4. Not that I'm advocating that strategy but that should tell you that the Giants are in a great position right now despite how tough the schedule is.yacobad said:man i was just looking, the giants stretch run is pretty brutal
@ NE - W
@ SF
vs PHIL
@ NO
vs GB
@ DAL
it's possible that they lose all the remaining games. i personally don't think they will, but it wouldn't be out of the question. if you come out of that 6 game stretch 4-2, i'd be ecstatic, and even 3-3 wouldn't be bad.
LevelNth said:I think our receivers and D are better, but it's an argument to be made.
And I never said we were 'on the cusp'. Even if we got a great QB it would take a few years obviously. But we have the talent now, they are all young, and frankly, we've had so many losing seasons because missing a quality QB is devastating to a team.
meadowrag said:Bears are getting in.
If you ask me, so are Atlanta and New Orleans.
Despite a good start, I think it's the Lions that miss it this year. The loss against Atlanta is really going to hurt them, and I think NO will beat them too. Then on top of that they've got GB twice still, CHI, and SD.
Green Bay
Niners
Giants
Saints
Bears
Falcons
Bears get in regardless of who wins the South
Then Atlanta travels to GB in the 2nd round for a glorious revenge game
That's why that win over NE was so big. It will be telling how this defense performs in the next several weeks. They were great for most of the game vs. NE and Brady, but it faces a great task in this stretch also, sans Alex Smith of course. Key is obviously stopping Gore, and the Niners defense is the best of this bunch. Gonna need Nicks back, and probably Bradshaw.yacobod said:man i was just looking, the giants stretch run is pretty brutal
@ NE - W
@ SF
vs PHIL
@ NO
vs GB
@ DAL
it's possible that they lose all the remaining games. i personally don't think they will, but it wouldn't be out of the question. if you come out of that 6 game stretch 4-2, i'd be ecstatic, and even 3-3 wouldn't be bad.
LevelNth said:I think our receivers and D are better, but it's an argument to be made.
And I never said we were 'on the cusp'. Even if we got a great QB it would take a few years obviously. But we have the talent now, they are all young, and frankly, we've had so many losing seasons because missing a quality QB is devastating to a team.
LevelNth said:Look it sounds ridiculous I know, and I don't mean winning everything all the time, but ALWAYS in the hunt, ALWAYS in the playoffs.
Actually that is a MUCH better way of putting it. Combined with constantly changing schemes and coordinators, that was a recipe for disaster for us. Our records undersold our talent, and I don't think that's a hard argument to make with the dramatic turn around this year.eznark said:Clearly not. Just removing the position altogether is just as effective! Relying on a shitty quarterback is where you get into trouble.
I'm anxiously awaiting your game this week. Going to be so freaking telling for both teams and the NFC as a whole. Easily the most important game of the season for the Conference.
Mrbob said:I wonder what the Bears are going to do with Carimi. The line has solidified with him on the bench and Lance Louis has been doing work at RT. Really good work. Move Carimi back to LT and move Webb to LG?
LevelNth said:I think our receivers and D are better, but it's an argument to be made.
LevelNth said:Look it sounds ridiculous I know, and I don't mean winning everything all the time, but ALWAYS in the hunt, ALWAYS in the playoffs.
I don't think SF has better WRs than BAL but I do believe they're defense is slightly better.Bowser said:Eh, I wouldn't go that far.
LevelNth said:Actually that is a MUCH better way of putting it. Combined with constantly changing schemes and coordinators, that was a recipe for disaster for us. Our records undersold our talent, and I don't think that's a hard argument to make with the dramatic turn around this year.
I completely agree on the Giants game. Niners still have a long way to go (we unfortunately cannot be gifted a Brees or a Brady to become that dream dynasty any time soon), and I'm still concerned about the maturity of our offense. It can be there, but I'm not sure it will be in time.
levious said:you just described the Eagles' "dynasty."
methodman said:You're wrong eznark. I feel like no matter who's the qb in Harbaugh's offense, he will only throw it 25-30 times per game.
Drakeon said:Eh, its better than 10 years of sucking and nowhere near the playoffs. Not that I want to land in the eagles shoes with a coach who has them on the cusp every year but can't ever finish, however when you haven't even tasted the playoffs in 10 years, it's good to just look forward to that.
squicken said:http://stage.101espn.com/podcasting/2011/11/p_Zach_and_Coach_20111108_9am.mp3
For Rams fans on all that is wrong with Bradford. Just listen to the first 5 minutes.
-Doesn't move in pocket. Can't sense pressure
-Can't make any throws outside the numbers or throw deep w/accuracy
-Can't read second level of defense
-Cannot anticipate receivers coming open. Instead waits for them to get open before throwing
-Team has better chance of winning right now with Feeley
Those are the bullet points but it's worth the listen.
Rick Venturi isn't as blunt as I've made it sound, but that's just to not piss off all of Bradford's fans. He says it's a coaching and experience problem and can be corrected, but again, I think that's just being pragmatic on his part.
Holy shit 7-9!!! Dat first overall.Drakeon said:So if Bradford is as bad as you've been saying, how the fuck did they get to 7-9 last year?
I think he means rather than Harbaugh purposely limiting Smith, it's actually the foundation of his offensive scheme. Luck didn't exactly always throw more than 25-30 times last year either.eznark said:How does that make me wrong??
BaltimoreLarry said:No, just no. The only position you have that is better than the Ravens is TE. I even think Sam Koch is better than Andy Lee.
This is typical Niners fans....delusional.
DeaconKnowledge said:edit: NFL.com is reporting Paterno's on his way out.
Yep. My bad I'm on my phone typing thisLevelNth said:I think he means rather than Harbaugh purposely limiting Smith, it's actually the foundation of his offensive scheme. Luck didn't exactly always throw more than 25-30 times last year either.
I could be misinterpreting.
You have some of the worst coaching in the league this year, and the insane fan base is placing as much blame as they can on Bradford.squicken said:http://stage.101espn.com/podcasting/2011/11/p_Zach_and_Coach_20111108_9am.mp3
For Rams fans on all that is wrong with Bradford. Just listen to the first 5 minutes.
-Doesn't move in pocket. Can't sense pressure
-Can't make any throws outside the numbers or throw deep w/accuracy
-Can't read second level of defense
-Cannot anticipate receivers coming open. Instead waits for them to get open before throwing
-Team has better chance of winning right now with Feeley
Those are the bullet points but it's worth the listen.
Rick Venturi isn't as blunt as I've made it sound, but that's just to not piss off all of Bradford's fans. He says it's a coaching and experience problem and can be corrected, but again, I think that's just being pragmatic on his part.