• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NFL 2011 Week 8 |OT| Tim Tebow

Status
Not open for further replies.
eznark said:
Bikini girls

mczvyu.gif
 

Drakeon

Member
Kinda wish there were some better rivalries in the NFC West. I mean, I don't really hate the Cardinals, Seahawks or Rams. Not sure what cultivates that good rivalry between divisions? Maybe just give it some time, I know the Seahawks haven't been part of the division for very long.

Cowboys and Packers strike me as more of rivals than the three NFC West teams, although thats due to the 90s playoffs.
 
Drakeon said:
Not sure what cultivates that good rivalry between divisions?
History and continued competitiveness between the teams in the division. It's also why you'll find that fans of NFC East teams will usually list rivals in the division before any other team in the league.

Of course in the 80's/early 90's the Giants/Niners rivalry was pretty apparent. Same for the Bears. There's some residual hatred for the Cardinals as well, them having been in the East and all but very little remains.:)

The East gets so much media attention because of the rivalries and history between the teams and because of the success of the division.

NFC East teams have a combined 19 NFC wins and eleven Super Bowl victories, the highest marks of any division in the NFL. Each of the current NFC East's four teams has won at least three NFL titles during their existence; however, only Philadelphia has yet to win a championship in the Super Bowl era. Given the division members' histories and intense rivalries such as the Cowboys–Redskins rivalry and Eagles–Giants rivalry (indeed, the entire division is often seen as one singular 4-team rivalry)

It makes for good (and highly rated) football match-ups more often than not.
 

cajunator

Banned
The NFC South has a pretty bitter rivalry with each other as well. Probably due to the whole worst to first phenomenon where a different team is first in the division seemingly every year. I kind of like it that way though because no one team is dominant for nearly a whole decade like the AFC East/AFC West.
 
Probably been posted, but there was an interesting little editorial on deadspin about HGH a few days ago:

Besides, these men are naturally freakish specimens. They don't need drugs to look like that. I know this isn't what people want to hear, but it's the truth. Sure, there are some juiced-up behemoths in the league. But they are very rare. The popular reasoning is that an aging football player might shoot up HGH to give him that extra edge he needs to compete. Well, there aren't many aging football players in the NFL. (The average age is 27.) And for the most part, the ones who are aging are well-respected team leaders who aren't going to risk their reputations on a "maybe" drug. It's a young man's league with abundantly flowing young-man testosterone. By the time you need to shoot up to get that edge, you're already gone.
http://deadspin.com/5853658/why-hgh-will-never-be-a-problem-in-the-nfl?tag=NFL-roundtable
 

Goro Majima

Kitty Genovese Member
Eric Walton said:
When the Vikings move to LA, what time from the NFC West will go North? St. Louis or Seattle?

edit:

Does Wellington post anymore? I miss that guy.

St. Louis I would think.

I hope the Vikings stay and build an outdoor stadium. Domes are for sissies.
 
Alligatorjandro said:
How come no one hates the Browns?lol

I haven't hated the Browns since the early 90s. Then those assholes from Baltimore stole their team and left the city even worse than it was. Ahh, the early 90s when my hate list was:

Browns
Oilers
Cowboys
Bills
Forty-Whiners
 

squicken

Member
Drakeon said:
Kinda wish there were some better rivalries in the NFC West. I mean, I don't really hate the Cardinals, Seahawks or Rams. Not sure what cultivates that good rivalry between divisions? Maybe just give it some time, I know the Seahawks haven't been part of the division for very long.

Cowboys and Packers strike me as more of rivals than the three NFC West teams, although thats due to the 90s playoffs.

The NFL divisions have always bugged me. AFCS is also a problem b/c of lack of geographic or historical rivalries

The LA Rams and 49ers had an ever so slight rivalry in the Chris Everett era. But mostly, the division is just a cobbled together mess, with no geographic identity. The fact that all the teams usually suck doesn't help.

Cards: Used to be in NFC East
49ers: True NFCW
Rams: Missouri is not West
SEA: Used to be in AFC

When the Rams move to London, hopefully they can realign a few of the teams/divisions. Leave AFCN, NFCN, and NFCS alone. NFL should move Dallas out of the East but they never will
 

cajunator

Banned
squicken said:
The NFL divisions have always bugged me. AFCS is also a problem b/c of lack of geographic or historical rivalries

The LA Rams and 49ers had an ever so slight rivalry in the Chris Everett era. But mostly, the division is just a cobbled together mess, with no geographic identity. The fact that all the teams usually suck doesn't help.

Cards: Used to be in NFC East
49ers: True NFCW
Rams: Missouri is not West
SEA: Used to be in AFC

When the Rams move to London, hopefully they can realign a few of the teams/divisions. Leave AFCN, NFCN, and NFCS alone. NFL should move Dallas out of the East but they never will
fucking lol. Didn't he try to jump over a table and beat the fuck out of some tv show host for that?
 

Drakeon

Member
Eric Walton said:
NFC West:
Arizona, San Fran, Seattle, LA Vikings

NFC North:
Green Bay, Detroit, Chicago, St. Louis

NFC East:
Carolina, New York, Philadelphia, Washington

NFC South:
Atlanta, Dallas, New Orleans, Tampa Bay (or: London Merry Ol' Gents)

Makes sense geographically, but won't ever happen with NFC East/South, NFC East will never be broken up.
 
Eric Walton said:
NFC West:
Arizona, San Fran, Seattle, LA Vikings

NFC North:
Green Bay, Detroit, Chicago, St. Louis

NFC East:
Carolina, New York, Philadelphia, Washington

NFC South:
Atlanta, Dallas, New Orleans, Tampa Bay (or: London Merry Ol' Gents)
Yeah, you're not breaking up the NFC East.

The St Louis/Vikings trade will totally happen if the Vikes relocate to LA, though. Just makes too much sense.
 

Milabrega

Member
Eric Walton said:
NFC West:
Arizona, San Fran, Seattle, LA Vikings

NFC North:
Green Bay, Detroit, Chicago, St. Louis

NFC East:
Carolina, New York, Philadelphia, Washington

NFC South:
Atlanta, Dallas, New Orleans, Tampa Bay (or: London Merry Ol' Gents)

I like that, no reason for Cowboys to be in the East. Fuck rivalry and history nonsense.

AFC East:
New England, NYJ, Buffalo/Toronto, Baltimore

AFC North:
Indy, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Cincinnati

AFC South:
Jacksonville, Miami, Houston, Tennessee

AFC West:
Denver, Oakland, San Diego, KC
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
squicken said:
The LA Rams and 49ers had an ever so slight rivalry in the Chris Everett era.
wat

I thought the rivalry went all the way back into the 40s when both teams joined the NFL. Really picked up in the late 60s/early 70s (Rams were good then Niners were good then Rams took it again) and then into the 80s and 90s (both teams made the playoffs several times).
 

squicken

Member
XiaNaphryz said:
wat

I thought the rivalry went all the way back into the 40s when both teams joined the NFL. Really picked up in the late 60s/early 70s (Rams were good then Niners were good then Rams took it again) and then into the 80s and 90s (both teams made the playoffs several times).

As I always understood it, the 49ers had been a joke franchise for a long time until Bill Walsh got there. Even then that division sucked. They had the Saints and the Falcons in the NFCW

There's lots of things they could do for realignment, but I'd love to see a HOU/DAL/NO division, with probably AZ as the throw in team. Dallas would never allow that. They don't want the Texans on equal footing in the state, and don't want to lose access to big NE markets
 

cajunator

Banned
I hate the cowboys because they fucking suck most years and the media still slobbers over them. It's kind of ridiculous. I know they get a lot of attention for being in NFC East and having a fucking gigantic market but I just get sick of hearing about them constantly. I'm pretty sure a lot of fans of other teams feel the same way. Other franchises have been very successful but you don't see the media continually slobbing their knob unless they happen to be good that year.
 

meadowrag

Banned
There shouldn't be an L.A. team.
Can you imagine the amount of bandwagoning when Californians have four different teams to choose from?
 
squicken said:
As I always understood it, the 49ers had been a joke franchise for a long time until Bill Walsh got there. Even then that division sucked. They had the Saints and the Falcons in the NFCW

There's lots of things they could do for realignment, but I'd love to see a HOU/DAL/NO division, with probably AZ as the throw in team. Dallas would never allow that. They don't want the Texans on equal footing in the state, and don't want to lose access to big NE markets

no we weren't a joke of a franchise in the early 70's. dick nolan had some decent years but people often refer to us as a joke because we had back to back years of 2-14 ('78 and '79). we weren't horrible every year though, we just couldn't beat the cowpies. we lost to them in the playoffs in 1970, 1971 and 1972. that is why it was such a big deal that we beat them in 1981
 

squicken

Member
FrenchMovieTheme said:
no we weren't a joke of a franchise in the early 70's. dick nolan had some decent years but people often refer to us as a joke because we had back to back years of 2-14 ('78 and '79). we weren't horrible every year though, we just couldn't beat the cowpies. we lost to them in the playoffs in 1970, 1971 and 1972. that is why it was such a big deal that we beat them in 1981

Thanks for the info. I really don't know much history on the non-marquee teams in the league. So I just fall back on what I was around for.

SlackAdjuster said:
Games with the Oilers used to be so fun

Yes! The Glanville/Schotty/Wyche era was great. I will leave Chuck Noll of that list b/c he was too classy but also b/c the game had passed him by.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTpuCIT9rZg

overcast said:
That's why I don't want the Rams in LA.

The newest rumor is Kroenke being the point man to set up the league in London. The NFL really wanted him to take over the team from the Rosenblum's. The league doesn't want the Glazers involved with the London team, and Kroenke is familiar with things b/c of his Arsenal ownership
 

Miguel

Member
overcast said:
K I apologize in advance for bringing this up. Brady Vs. Pit, or Stafford vs. Den?
HOW DARE YOU SULLY THIS MAGNIFICENT THREAD PANDERING FOR FANTASY FOOTBALL ADVICE?!

/eznark

I think you go Brady over Stafford pretty much any time, nice problem to have early in the season, and I think Stafford will eventually break out again with Megatron, but Brady to Welker is always too dangerous to not have in the lineup.
 

linkboy

Member
squicken said:
As I always understood it, the 49ers had been a joke franchise for a long time until Bill Walsh got there. Even then that division sucked. They had the Saints and the Falcons in the NFCW

There's lots of things they could do for realignment, but I'd love to see a HOU/DAL/NO division, with probably AZ as the throw in team. Dallas would never allow that. They don't want the Texans on equal footing in the state, and don't want to lose access to big NE markets

They weren't a joke franchise, they would have some good seasons, followed by some bad seasons.

They were a joke franchise right before Walsh took over, though. They went from 2-14 in 79 to 13-3 and a Super Bowl title in two years.

As for realignment, you can't break up divisions like the NFC East or AFC West. The NFL likes rivalries because it makes money.
 

overcast

Member
Miguel said:
HOW DARE YOU SULLY THIS MAGNIFICENT THREAD PANDERING FOR FANTASY FOOTBALL ADVICE?!

/eznark

I think you go Brady over Stafford pretty much any time, nice problem to have early in the season, and I think Stafford will eventually break out again with Megatron, but Brady to Welker is always too dangerous to not have in the lineup.
Lol. Alright, I figured as much. Stafford really let me down this week, I think he does well this week though. Thanks for the advice.
 

Milchjon

Member
I still can't get over the fact that we'll have a guy who got cut from the Texans as a starting CB tomorrow. I'ma go all Plinko on this game. We're fucked.
 

cajunator

Banned
Milchjon said:
I still can't get over the fact that we'll have a guy who got cut from the Texans as a starting CB tomorrow. I'ma go all Plinko on this game. We're fucked.
Just don't put him on Mike Wallace. Because....that's a bad idea.
 

squicken

Member
Milchjon said:
I still can't get over the fact that we'll have a guy who got cut from the Texans as a starting CB tomorrow. I'ma go all Plinko on this game. We're fucked.

The Texans cut Tramon Williams, who is an outstanding CB for the Packers. Had a great playoffs last year and got a big contract extension.

Bad teams are bad in most part b/c they cannot evaluate talent.
 

Goro Majima

Kitty Genovese Member
squicken said:
The Texans cut Tramon Williams, who is an outstanding CB for the Packers. Had a great playoffs last year and got a big contract extension.

Bad teams are bad in most part b/c they cannot evaluate talent.

Never draft a Canadian addicted to pain killers...

It's hard not to look at the 1989 draft and go "what if?"
 
Eric Walton said:
NFC West:
Arizona, San Fran, Seattle, LA Vikings

NFC North:
Green Bay, Detroit, Chicago, St. Louis

NFC East:
Carolina, New York, Philadelphia, Washington

NFC South:
Atlanta, Dallas, New Orleans, Tampa Bay (or: London Merry Ol' Gents)

This makes so much sense that it'll never happen.
 
The way I would realign the divisions is as followed.

AFC South-Jacksonville,Houston,Miami,Tennessee
AFC East-Buffalo,New York Jets,New England Patriots,Baltimore Ravens
AFC North-Indianapolis Colts,Pittsburgh Steelers,Cincinnati Bengals, Cleveland Browns
AFC West-Denver Broncos,Kansas City Chiefs,St. Louis Rams,Seattle Seahawks

NFC South-Atlanta Falcons,Tampa Bay Buccaneers,New Orleans Saints,Dallas Cowboys
NFC East-Washington Redskins,New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles,Carolina Panthers
NFC North-Detroit Lions,Green Bay Packers, Chicago Bears,Minnesota Vikings
NFC West-Arizona Cardinals,San Francisco 49ers,San Deigo Chargers,Oakland Raiders

In California, you would have 3 teams in the NFC West which would I think make for great rivalries and in the AFC West you would have 3 teams within close proximity to each other and also move Indianapolis out of the AFC South and put them in the AFC North where they truely belong in the first place and move Miami to the AFC South and move Baltimore to the AFC East.

What do you guys think?
 

bionic77

Member
Has anyone drafted receivers better than the Steelers in the last 10 or so years?

Burress, Holmes, Wallace, etc.

We got linebackers and receivers on lockdown. Now we just need to learn how to draft and develop offensive linemen and corners.
 

Striker

Member
bionic77 said:
Has anyone drafted receivers better than the Steelers in the last 10 or so years?

Burress, Holmes, Wallace, etc.

We got linebackers and receivers on lockdown. Now we just need to learn how to draft and develop offensive linemen and corners.
2x5tA.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom