I don't recall getting on the field, was I drunk?
Someone slipped a mickey into the bagged milk that day.
I don't recall getting on the field, was I drunk?
I don't recall getting on the field, was I drunk?
I've watched the game three times and say about 5 plays where they had a spy. Twice they used Matthews twice Woodson and the other times other LBs. it wasn't something they did with any sort of regularity or consistency and Capers said it wasn't part of the game plan going in.
Assigning a spy on 7% of defensive snaps is hardly meaningful.
There was another play (third and long where Kaep scrambled for the first) that it looked like Clay was supposed to spy but he blitzed. So maybe 6.
You're a Browns fan, the question should be "was I sober?"
Someone slipped a mickey into the bagged milk that day.
As drunk as you were when you decide to root for the Browns.
Just because your dumb fuck players didn't execute the play doesn't mean it wasn't called. Kap was spyed plenty but it didn't matter because he is a superior talent
Well, in this case it kind of does. Capers and the defense said they prepared and game planned for a pocket passer. If Atlanta is being less abjectly retarded than GB they won't be forced to try and make brain dead cro magnons try to adjust on the fly.
I'm not in any way denigrating Kaepernick, but I really think you are giving the Packers defense way, way too much credit if you think they in any way prepared and planned for his unique skill set.
GB played a horrible defensive game. I'm just saying if you look at GB vs ATL D, gb has the better D on paper. Games aren't played on paper of course but Atls D didn't exactly set the world on fire last week either
Yeah I don't disagree with you all I am saying is that even a day of prep work will go a long way. Also, Atlantas defense is a much better tackling team. Lots meaner than GB.
That's fine. If the Atlanta D plays similar to last week they will get blown out
I'm just worried the falcons will be far better prepared to play Kaep. I think the Packers would still smoke the Falcons, but 49ers/Falcons had the potential to be a real game.
If the Falcons win, I'll be kind of pissed. Don't let me down SF.
I don't get the "packers weren't ready!" Excuse. They shut the read option down before and I find it hard to believe they didn't prepare for it at all but whatever
What did we do to you, Brenny?I'm just worried the falcons will be far better prepared to play Kaep. I think the Packers would still smoke the Falcons, but 49ers/Falcons had the potential to be a real game.
If the Falcons win, I'll be kind of pissed. Don't let me down SF.
I don't get the "packers weren't ready!" Excuse. They shut the read option down before and I find it hard to believe they didn't prepare for it at all but whatever
I'm still glad he is coaching the team thanks to the Looney Rule.
I'm just worried the falcons will be far better prepared to play Kaep. I think the Packers would still smoke the Falcons, but 49ers/Falcons had the potential to be a real game.
If the Falcons win, I'll be kind of pissed. Don't let me down SF.
I'm just worried the falcons will be far better prepared to play Kaep. I think the Packers would still smoke the Falcons, but 49ers/Falcons had the potential to be a real game.
If the Falcons win, I'll be kind of pissed. Don't let me down SF.
Kaep isn't going to react well in the dome if he turns the ball over.
The Niners fans won't fill up half of the dome like the Packers fans would.
It's not really an excuse. For God knows what reason, they didn't bother setting the edge at all. Maybe Capers thought Reggie White was coming through the tunnel.I don't get the "packers weren't ready!" Excuse. They shut the read option down before and I find it hard to believe they didn't prepare for it at all but whatever
RIP Prop Joe
Kaep isn't going to react well in the dome if he turns the ball over.
The Niners fans won't fill up half of the dome like the Packers fans would.
So those seats are just going to be empty?
Your hall of fame coach from the Orioles died as well.
Falcons haven't used a spy under Nolan at all this year. It's a stupid strategy that doesn't work in today's NFL.
Goddamnit, Andres.
I don't get the "packers weren't ready!" Excuse. They shut the read option down before and I find it hard to believe they didn't prepare for it at all but whatever
Yep. Our defense has more experience against QBs like Kap than most people seem to realize. Just this year we faced what Cam twice, Vick, RGIII, and Wilson. I'm confident the D will be prepared as they can be for Kap.
and they've failed against all of them. every QB (except RGIII, who went out with an injury) has had good to great success against the falcons D this year
Kaep isn't going to react well in the dome if he turns the ball over.
The Niners fans won't fill up half of the dome like the Packers fans would.
I'm still glad he is coaching the team thanks to the Looney Rule.
Vick was terrible against the Falcons this year. His worst game of the year for sure.
21/35, 191 yards, 1 TD, 0 int, 7 rushes, 42 yards is his worst line of the year? guess vick didn't have a bad year!
yeah i remember when kap made his first ever road start in new orleans against a saints team that could have been called the hottest team in the NFL. can't remember how it turned out though.... i'm sure kap completely folded and the saints rolled to victory and into the playoffs
Why do you want the Falcons to lose? I tend to default to pulling for whatever franchise hasn't won a ring before.
and they've failed against all of them. every QB (except RGIII, who went out with an injury) has had good to great success against the falcons D this year
It's what you didn't do, which is play a tough game against the Packers. I only want SF to win because had we been in their spot, we likely would roll Atlanta.What did we do to you, Brenny?
Hottest team in the NFL at the time? They had the worst defense in history bro.
What happened against the Seachickens, again?
EDIT: Since when does winning games = failing?
You are a good man.
EDIT: Since when does winning games = failing?