Seahawks.
An intriguing idea.
I'll see if I can find any good deals on Beastmode jerseys.
Seahawks.
Join us. Born and raised in L.A., but where I'm at now is full of douchebag 49er fan and was too young for Raiders. Fuck San Diego and Arizona for similar non-sports reasons, and St. Louis is not west in any wayAn intriguing idea.
I'll see if I can find any good deals on Beastmode jerseys.
Join us. Born and raised in L.A., but where I'm at now is full of douchebag 49er fan and was too young for Raiders. Fuck San Diego and Arizona for similar non-sports reasons, and St. Louis is not west in any way. Plus, Seattle fan is awesome, they love their football.except their win-loss record
Best thing ever.
Simpson is definitely still partaking if this video is any evidence.
http://www.vikings.com/media-vault/...gs-Style/ae0bc528-f624-40d7-8ad0-81313fdc4044
Goddamn. Lots of fanboy rage in that thread about the Samsung phone outselling the iPhone.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/04/pfts-week-one-picks-3/
49ers at Packers
Florios take: When one of the best offenses meets one of the best defenses, the game will turn on how the other offense fares against the other defense. The Packers defense has improved just enough to hold serve at Lambeau Field in the season opener.
Florios pick: Packers 30, 49ers 27.
Bullshit!
Agreed, no way 49ers score 27pts.
Haha... the bears got no o-line so history would repeat itself if Hanie was still there. I predict the bears will lose 3 and not 2 quarterbacks this year.Unlike the bears, we have a good team, not a team that totally falls apart when one player goes down. Your team is trash and your front office and coaching staff are a joke
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/04/pfts-week-one-picks-3/
49ers at Packers
Florios take: When one of the best offenses meets one of the best defenses, the game will turn on how the other offense fares against the other defense. The Packers defense has improved just enough to hold serve at Lambeau Field in the season opener.
Florios pick: Packers 30, 49ers 27.
MDSs take: The NFL schedule makers gave us a potential NFC Championship Game preview in Week One, and I see the Packers offense picking right up where they left off last year and the Packers defense looking better.
MDSs pick: Packers 27, 49ers 14.
Bullshit!
Here kitty kitty. Let's get it on.
If you actually sprayed a panther in the face with that dinky ass spray bottle, you'd get mauled.
Fitting, as a mauling is exactly what's in store for Tampa on Sunday.
Our o-line was also injured to all hell last year, let's not forget that.Haha... the bears got no o-line so history would repeat itself if Hanie was still there. I predict the bears will lose 3 and not 2 quarterbacks this year.
I'm starting Cam and Steve Smith in one of my fantasy leagues so I'm hoping you're right!If you actually sprayed a panther in the face with that dinky ass spray bottle, you'd get mauled.
Fitting, as a mauling is exactly what's in store for Tampa on Sunday.
I cant believe we are like 12 hours from kickoff. This offseason flew by. I am really hoping we will get much better football this year at the start. Last year it felt like a lot of teams were sloppy due to the lockout.
he's playing it off so that when they're destroyed he doesn't have to seem shocked
and in the 1% chance that Rodgers doesn't feel like winning the game, he can NINERS BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITCH for the entire week
I guess that is what having summers off does for you. It fells like I just started my break a few days ago. I just saw that I am the only person picking the Panthers in the GAF survival league. I dont get that at all. TB is going to be beyond terrible this year. I think that might be the biggest blowout of the week.
.
It's the cowards way to approach a game.
I find it really bizarre that everyone is just assuming the Packers defense will be better. I don't see it.
They cant be worse right. Plus werent a lot of their problems last year due to injuries, so that will atleast be better at the start.
.
It's the cowards way to approach a game.
I find it really bizarre that everyone is just assuming the Packers defense will be better. I don't see it.
Historically awful improving to awful is still an improvement.
I think the Packers D will be better if for no other reason then they will be a much better rushing team this year and that will allow them to control the ball more and give the D a rest from time to time. Dillion has had 3 straight 1000 yard season with the Bengals without much threat of a passing attack. He should have a much easier time running in GB.
I don't see why anyone asssumes they will improve to just awful though. Especially losing one of their best LB's in the preseason.
I know that you meant Benson but how did you end up with Dillion??
eznark is clearly Bob McGinn.
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/a-packers-recession-may-be-ahead-u96lk0k-168562956.html
eznark is clearly Bob McGinn.
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/a-packers-recession-may-be-ahead-u96lk0k-168562956.html
No idea. I am not used to being up this early yet. I dont drink coffee so I am a zombie most mornings until lunch time. I knew they signed a RB from the Bengals and my brain just jumped back a player I guess.
I know this is probably implied but you gotta give the receivers and O-line some credit too, right?The only thing that matters in the NFL is the quarterback.
Dillon also played on the Bengals for a long time before he went to New England.
Holy fuck that guy is complaining that they didnt look as good as they could have in the pre-season? They should totally trade Rodgers to the Eagles, they arent going to win with him if he cant even lead majestic drives in the preseason.
I know this is probably implied but you gotta give the receivers and O-line some credit too, right?
And eznark you better be wrong about the defense. I've been dreaming of an at least competent defense all off season.
Do we have an NFLGAF Week 0 Power Rankings?
Hai guyz. I'm in a bad QB league and I wanna know which teams have the best chance of having a shitty QB depth chart. I was going to pick the Dolphins but Tannehill might have a breakout season
So you'd be okay with trading every starting offensive player for the Packers minus Rodgers for every starting offensive player for the Dolphins? I mean, surely they at least make some difference?No, it is not. I don't imply things. I state things in white and white. Good receivers and a competent offensive line are needed to supplement weaknesses in a QB. In today's NFL neither are necessary. Great QB's make lines and wide outs look good.
So you'd be okay with trading every starting offensive player for the Packers minus Rodgers for every starting offensive player for the Dolphins? I mean, surely they at least make some difference?
I don't disagree with you in that QB's make lines and wide outs look good, though. That's why "star" receivers always suck on the Dolphins, they don't have anyone to throw them the ball. "Wes Welker" syndrome.
As in he will break out of Dolphins jail and go to an actual professional football team? Otherwise, they are a safe pick.
No, it is not. I don't imply things. I state things in white and white. Good receivers and a competent offensive line are needed to supplement weaknesses in a QB. In today's NFL neither are necessary. Great QB's make lines and wide outs look good.
Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb, and Greg Jennings are all 2nd round picks. Finley is a 3rd. So did Ted Thompson prioritize the receiving position b/c he thinks Rodgers needed his weaknesses supplemented, or does he believe differently than you do?
Haha, that's not what I said, though. I'd possibly agree with you on that point (although the Dolphins are a special kind of terrible so I'm not sure). I'm just surprised that you think an o-line and receivers make absolutely no difference whatsoever, like they are all just completely and totally interchangeable. It seems a little drastic to me but I guess I can see why you'd feel that way given the direction the NFL has gone in the past few years.Yes, 100%. I guaranty the Dolphins + Rodgers are better than the Packers + Tannehill. Without even a minor hesitation.