ez scoll to the bottom for some stat breakdown on penalties
http://www.footballperspective.com/nyt-fifth-down-post-week-2/
The thing with the Skins though is that if you have a DL that is banged up, shouldn't you play more zone? Amendola's big reception came vs man. I said during and after the game that it was crazy for them to play so much zone against STL, but given WAS' injury situation I'm not sure that's true. Even Bradford and the Rams WRs can beat man if they have time
There were some interesting changes in the penalty data in week two. As you may recall, there were 26 defensive pass interference penalties enforced in week 1 — an extremely high number — compared to just 5 defensive holding penalties and only one illegal contact penalty. In week two, only 14 defensive pass interference penalties were enforced, but the number of defensive holding (10) and illegal contact penalties (6) each rose by five. This is more in line with historical data, and a good sign that the replacement officials aren’t simply calling everything pass interference (Ike Taylor’s penalty against the Jets, notwithstanding).
There were fewer personal foul and unnecessary roughness penalties enforced in week one of the 2012 season than in week 1 last year, but things changed quickly in week two. Teams had 23 total personal foul or unnecessary roughness penalties enforced against them in week 2, compared to just 11 last week. Of course, as most fans who watched the majority of the games this weekend noticed, there was good reason for the uptick.
Have you ever watched a professional sports game and thought the officials had literally no impact on the game? I can't think of a single instance. Maybe a NASCAR race before the "debris on the track" yellow flag innovation.No one who watched the games this weekend came away thinking the replacement referees had no impact on the game.
Reading that article, that sounds bad for a defense that already has taken some major blows with the loss of two big name players. It seems to be the Skins luck though. They seem to finally get a playmaker at QB and the offense is somewhat clicking and now the defense (which has been solid for years now) is falling apart.
The Giants are going through a bit of this right now without the seemingly public coordinator spat. Corey Webster specifically came out and said he wanted the Giants CB's to play more press and he wasn't a fan of the soft zones he's being asked to play. Fewell came out and agreed with him more aggressiveness may be called for moving forward. I guess we'll see how the Giants CB's deal with the Panthers WR's on Thursday as to whether that's the case or not.
Article on that here with some gifs showing Corey in zone and the plays given up to Jackson:
http://www.bigblueview.com/2012/9/1...ants-secondary-perry-fewell-carolina-panthers
The funny (or less funny if you're a Giants fan) part is that even when he's lined up to play press, Jackson blows by him like he's not even there.
He doesn't redirect him at the line or even get a hand on him until he's already taken the outside position. Even worse, he does an awful job of contesting the catch. It looks he trips and just goes for Jackson's legs once the catch is made. (and oh hey, Antrel Rolle is late and takes a poor angle! SHOCK!)
Let's see how a real TE blocks.
Depends on your personnel don't you think? I mean if you have CB's that are poor in zone coverage but who's strength lies in pressing the receivers and disrupting their timing I would think you would want to play more press or mix in more press depending on the offensive formation and what the defense is seeing. 3rd and 15 for instance, there's little need to be in a position to give up the big play by having your corners press. Play the softer coverage, keep everything in front of you and hope that your defense are sure in their tackling if you give up the underneath throw.squicken said:The thing with the Skins though is that if you have a DL that is banged up, shouldn't you play more zone? Amendola's big reception came vs man. I said during and after the game that it was crazy for them to play so much zone against STL, but given WAS' injury situation I'm not sure that's true. Even Bradford and the Rams WRs can beat man if they have time
To be fair, that's about 10,0000x easier than picking up a corner coming free from a planted position.
Rivers and Prince back will be nice - Rivers can help stabilize a rotation in at LB since Carolina can either be run heavy or pass happy.Bradshaw, Diehl, Hixon and Adewale Ojomo have been ruled - Coe & Nicks are questionable - Prince, Rivers and Scott are probable for tomorrow
Put up or shut up time for Prince. We need him to play well. Speaking of which, I watched some of the coaches film last night and Hosely did play very well. He had a few bad plays here and there and he wasn't exactly lined up against any studs but I'm hopeful we might have found a quality CB in him.Striker said:Rivers and Prince back will be nice - Rivers can help stabilize a rotation in at LB since Carolina can either be run heavy or pass happy.
Hopefully Wilson can get a decent dose of action, and be a one two punch with Andre Brown. Nicks is expected to play also.
Can you find one where he doesn't have momentum?
Well then, I agree..Packers are only favored by 3.5. Most people think it will be a relatively close game.
Your (?) opening line is garbage though:
.
Last week, I hinted that there may be a bias by the officials in favor of the home team, as these less-experienced referees may be more likely to side with the voices of the crowd. That hypotheses certainly wasnt disproved this week, as 14 of the 16 home teams won, the first time 14 home teams have won in a week since the league expanded to 32 teams. So far this season, there have been 231 penalties against visiting teams and only 188 penalties against the hosts. That ratio road teams having to deal with 23% more penalties is far out of line with historical data, which informs us that road teams had 7% more penalties enforced against them than home teams from 2000 to 2011.
Why? Finley has momentum, he's just flat out going the wrong way. If he can just put a little push on that guy, that play goes for 15+. Miller effectively takes the cb out of that screen play simply by being in the correct position. In Finley's defense however, that's bad coaching and bad looks in practice coupled with bad execution.
He was offered 4 million to comw back and he said no, fuck him.In Pats news, Branch is coming back! Yay. Also, Brian Waters refused a pay raise to come back.
Depends on your personnel don't you think?.
The NFL announced Wednesday that New York Giants wide receiver Hakeem Nicks is the NFC Offensive Player of the Week. Nicks caught 10 passes for 199 yards and a touchdown in the Giants' comeback victory over the Buccaneers on Sunday. It's the fourth time in his career he's caught at least 10 passes in one game, including the most recent Super Bowl.
The NFL could have picked any of three Giants for this award. Nicks' fellow wideout, Victor Cruz, caught 11 passes for 179 yards, including an 80-yard touchdown. Nicks and Cruz are the first teammates in NFL history to catch at least 10 passes and amass at least 175 receiving yards in the same game. As you might imagine, quarterback Eli Manning also had big numbers in this game. His 510 passing yards matched the ninth-highest single-game total in league history, and the Giants became the first team to pass for 500 yards and have two receivers each surpass 150 since the 1951 Los Angeles Rams of Norm Van Brocklin, Tom Fears and Elroy (Crazy Legs) Hirsch.
Hey can someone hook me up with that link for the comic about the dog and his owner?
Hakeem the Dream is the NFC Offensive Player of the Week:
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/43349/giants-nicks-nfc-offensive-player-of-week
Good for him. Replicate that this week in NC!
I'm actually excited to see if Brown can continue his success on the ground. If anything else, I'm hoping he does so that Coughlin has a hard time putting Diehl back in the lineup.
JJ Swatt DOP of the week.
I really thought it would be Ryans after the game he had against the Ravens.
That' because you are wholly unable to realize there are teams besides the Eagles playing football.
1. No he doesn't. This is directly off the snap. It's a 2 step drop and throw. Finley reacted hilariously slow to the snap. I wanted to be able to show comparions of how someone who knows what they are doing make the play.
2. How could you possibly know it's bad coaching and "bad looks in practice"? I mean you must know, because the Packers run that play often with two receivers and Driver generally makes a hell of a block. I'd love to know why (really just how) you have inside information into the tight end coaches in Green Bay. Spygate 2?
Rivers and Prince back will be nice - Rivers can help stabilize a rotation in at LB since Carolina can either be run heavy or pass happy.
Hopefully Wilson can get a decent dose of action, and be a one two punch with Andre Brown. Nicks is expected to play also.
1. Sure he does, he takes two steps, how many steps is required for momentum? 3?
I know what your saying, but blocking a guy in front of you is easier than picking up a guy on the move. The cb is quicker than Finley, that is the problem and it makes body position the most important factor.
2. I'm sure they've run that play a few times in practice. If it ever looked that bad, they wouldn't run it in a game. Now, if Finley hasn't lined up there for practice, that's bad coaching. If Finley has lined up there and hasn't gotten beaten like that, it's bad reps. He's clearly expecting the corner to cover him and/or stand there and take the block. If that's the look he gets in practice, that's the look he'll expect in the game. You play like you practice.
If he's playing out of position there due to injury or something, then that's a forgivable and correctable mistake.
If you say so. I t=just thought that was a big game, so people would be paying more attention to it, and he had a monster game. He played every snap, had 7 tackles, a sack, and an Int. He was definitely the Eagles best player on defense, and they shut down Joe Elite.
When I saw this on broadcast I thought it was the CB in man b/c I couldn't see the safety and CB basically swap position. I think there's a mix up here so I'm not sure exactly what this is
You have it right, it's man under, 2 deep with the safety and cb switching positions. The cb bites on something...
Working on one day of limited practice to boot. That's the shittiest part about this schedule. Giants only got Tuesday as a full practice. Monday was a jog through. Today they are traveling to NC.Bowser said:I hope we pick on Amukamara. For all intents and purposes, he's basically still a rookie in his first game back from a bum ankle.
That' because you are wholly unable to realize there are teams besides the Eagles playing football.
Where can I order one?
But the weird thing is that I think I am getting a little more worried about the Browns
Looking at the AFC North I think we can split with the Ravens or maybe steal the game in Baltimore. But the weird thing is that I think I am getting a little more worried about the Browns than the Bungles. We have been pretty vulnerable against the run this year and Richardson is a fucking beast. I am worried that if we don't get a lead he might be able to beat us in one of those games by himself, and with our schedule we need those games because we don't have many gimmes.
Sooooo, are all the Steelers' fans who were calling for Mendenhall's head last season apologetic now?
I wouldn't support a member of al Qaida on my team either!
I never liked him if I am being honest. I hate the way he holds the ball and I hate how horrible he is at catching the ball in the backfield. But right now we have one of the worst run games in the league so I am willing to give him another shot to see if he can help us...Sooooo, are all the Steelers' fans who were calling for Mendenhall's head last season apologetic now?
I wouldn't support a member of al Qaida on my team either!
From that Vince Young article
Ronnie Peoples is the finance guy VY is suing, here's a respone from Peoples
:lol at the low blows in the countersuit.
The Browns game was a gimme 2 wins the entire Big Ben era. We pretty always split with the Ravens (Ben is usually hurt for that game for some reason) and I am used to either sweeping or splitting with the Bungles.Wait....what?
I never liked him if I am being honest. I hate the way he holds the ball and I hate how horrible he is at catching the ball in the backfield. But right now we have one of the worst run games in the league so I am willing to give him another shot to see if he can help us...
He never fumbled that often, he was average in protecting the ball. But the way he holds it always scared me. Somehow he made it work but like I said I was never a huge fan. I always liked Moore best and wanted him to start. Good things always seemed to happen when he was on the field or had the ball. He was soooo good on 3rd down, both in blocking and receiving.Eh, fumbling really hasn't been a huge issue for Mendenhall since the 2009 season. And I've seen so many runs this season where a simple cutback to the outside would have resulted in some major runs, something that Mendenhall is infinitely better at than Dwyer and Redman.