Himynameischris
Member
you have a right to your opinion. Im talking in terms of legacy and how people will perceive it. Thats all we can go on, we can watch and make our cases but at the end of the day the majority will pick brady they already do and its really not close. again if peyton wins one more itll be different, but the media and experts in most cases pick tom. seriously I've already tried to make this clear Im not arguing that right now that's not my intention Im just pointing out, on message board, in nfl gaf, haters will say 0-2 asterisk, but all the football mind still pick tom and canton will pick tom just like peyton, people will debate, but if alls the same in the end tom will be favored.
Who cares who they pick or perceive if they use a stupid method to do it with? Anyone that debates who the best QB is without that bullshit will pick Manning over anyone, you can debate who the better overall team was between colts/pats and yeah I'd give the edge to the pat easily but the media and 'experts' can believe whatever bullshit they want, anyone that knows how to actually evaluate and compare players leaves the 'wins/loses' in the trash where it belongs. I hear so many football experts claim how it's unfair to burden the QB with wins/loses and then they turn around and do it anyways, it's ridiculous.
Edit: To further my point, ask anyone in the media if Marino is a top 5 QB and they'll agree he's at least in consideration, then ask how they compare tom and manning and they'll bring up the SBs...well you can't have it both ways, Marino can't be top 5 if you're using SB wins to compare QBs, they are so full of it they don't even realize the bullshit they spew.