Surely you are partially redeemed by using 100 posts per page format...right??
Surely you are partially redeemed by using 100 posts per page format...right??
Who is best girl? show us.
Alice is da best, all people who watch/read the manga know the truth. And stop trying to get me banned dog, don't make me sue you with my Jewish ways.
don't understand people mocking smith so high
guy is an elite talent but there's almost no way he plays his rookie year
teams in the top ten and middle don't have the luxury imo
Go eat some mayo hotdogs you monster!
I agree. I'm not the biggest Howie supporter, but I doubt Lurie would keep him around if he was that much of a problem.Lurie, McCoy, DeSean, Boykin, Avant, etc. etc. etc. And those are just the folks who came out and publicly said they didn't have a good relationship with Chip.
Do you have proof that other coaches wouldn't come to the Eagles because of Howie? My guess is a lack of a QB had a lot more to do with it. But maybe I missed some type of statement from Gase or McAdoo.
Dega forgot that I had Alice for a while.
You don't like black?
How the fuck do you exist in ATL Teddy Brosevelt?
Dark is beautiful!
Except when it comes to message board backgrounds. Just looks tacky to me.
If I was Denver, and I think Godslay would agree with me, I would all week practice like normal and have Manning as the starter...then come Sunday I'd have Brock start. It would cause chaos and totally fuck up the Pats game plan. I hope this doesn't happen because I'd rather Manning play, but it's what I would do if I was Denver.
If I was Denver, and I think Godslay would agree with me, I would all week practice like normal and have Manning as the starter...then come Sunday I'd have Brock start. It would cause chaos and totally fuck up the Pats game plan. I hope this doesn't happen because I'd rather Manning play, but it's what I would do if I was Denver.
If I was Denver, and I think Godslay would agree with me, I would all week practice like normal and have Manning as the starter...then come Sunday I'd have Brock start. It would cause chaos and totally fuck up the Pats game plan. I hope this doesn't happen because I'd rather Manning play, but it's what I would do if I was Denver.
You ain't my president.
Nah, you don't do that to Peyton. If they're down by more than 14 heading into the fourth or14 by the half then say Peyton has an injury and can't return. Brock has the time to study the opposing team for three quarters or a half at least at that point and should be able come off the bench to at least perform better than Peyton.
Don't worry Broncos fans because I believe in you. PLS SAVE US FROM ANOTHER CHEATRIOT SUPER BOWL GAME.
You would have your starting QB not take starting reps in practice during the lead up to your most important game of the season?
I actually think that this situation is fairly unique and might have lended itself to some sort of a split, if done correctly (I have no idea how, but I would've been open to the idea), but it's way too late for it at this point. Osweiler was destroyed by Kubiak in week 17.
Plus, the Pats have already seen Osweiler.
Lurie, McCoy, DeSean, Boykin, Avant, etc. etc. etc. And those are just the folks who came out and publicly said they didn't have a good relationship with Chip.
Do you have proof that other coaches wouldn't come to the Eagles because of Howie? My guess is a lack of a QB had a lot more to do with it. But maybe I missed some type of statement from Gase or McAdoo.
CSN Philly's Reuben Frank wrote a column on Friday titled: "Coach doesn't matter until Eagles fix disastrous front office." It's a long read, but it's a good one, so go check it out. Here's one of the things that stood out the most:
"Everybody knows Howie is holding back the organization," an NFL front-office executive said earlier this week. "Everybody but one person. And that person is the only one who matters. Jeffrey Lurie. He just doesnt see it."
Some other highlights:
The franchises decline directly follows Howie Rosemans rise to power.
Roseman has been general manager since 2010, minus last year, when Chip Kelly had the power. These have been dark days, filled with coaching turnover, quarterback instability, poor to average drafts and free agency catastrophes.
And precisely zero playoff wins.
Roseman is one of the most curious people to ever work for the Eagles. His track record is spotty, but he has Lurie convinced hes some sort of boy wonder who can do no wrong. Lurie even fired Banner, his closest friend, in order to give Roseman even more power.
I predicted a couple weeks ago that the top coaching candidates would reject the Eagles because people league-wide just dont want to work with Roseman. And here we are two weeks later with a guy coaching the Eagles who seven years ago was a high school coach in Louisiana.
Why is this topic being revisited now? Well, for one, it appears that the Eagles botched their coaching search. The team reportedly wanted Ben McAdoo, who stayed with the Giants. They also made a second run at 69-year-old Tom Coughlin, who turned them down. The words being used by Philly media to describe the Doug Pederson hire include "fallback choice." Roseman was part of Philadelphia's coaching search, and it's been suggested before that coaches don't want to work with him. We don't necessarily know if that's the case here, but it lines up with what's already been said.
Another reason this is relevant now is because this could be Roseman's last chance to get a coaching hire right. If Pederson doesn't work out, it's hard to see how Roseman would deserve another chance to hire the head coach after him.
My feelings about Roseman aren't a secret. I wrote back in December that his continued presence in the Eagles' front office is very troubling. Everything I've heard both publicly and privately leads me to believe he's much closer to being the problem than he is to ever being the solution.
Roseman has the chance to prove his doubters wrong by bringing high level talent to Philly and helping Pederson build a winner. Based on his track record, however, there's just not a lot of optimism he can be that guy. If Roseman fails as some people expect, it's only going to make people question why he was able to stay around so long. At that point it would be more than fair to seriously question Lurie's ability as an owner. If it isn't already.
Fuck Erin's 4th & 20 and the Hail Mary.
So happy Larry shut that momentum down quick.
Dark is beautiful!
Except when it comes to message board backgrounds. Just looks tacky to me.
If I was Denver, and I think Godslay would agree with me, I would all week practice like normal and have Manning as the starter...then come Sunday I'd have Brock start. It would cause chaos and totally fuck up the Pats game plan. I hope this doesn't happen because I'd rather Manning play, but it's what I would do if I was Denver.
After all of this, Lurie looks like the problem. I would have assumed Howie got the boot but it looks like he will keep rolling with him.Andy had Tom Modrak picking his players when he first got the job, they also had a lot of talent on the team from Ray Rhodes. Ray couldnt coach a lick, but he sure could draft defensive players. Pederson is a nothing in all this to me. He is a guy who never should have been an NFL head coach, and him being one will be looked at as a weird anomaly in a few years. He just happened to be the guy who got sucked into all this. Howie is the problem and he is the one who needs to go for things to get better. I wish Lurie could go but we know that wont happen for a very long time.
If I was Denver, and I think Godslay would agree with me, I would all week practice like normal and have Manning as the starter...then come Sunday I'd have Brock start. It would cause chaos and totally fuck up the Pats game plan.
After all of this, Lurie looks like the problem. I would have assumed Howie got the boot but it looks like he will keep rolling with him.
Lurie isn't close but he's moving in the direction of Snyder and Jerry as reasons a team isn't doing well. Not as interested in winning.
Brady could make those throws years ago. Now he only looks accurate on short passes or when Gronk (with his massive reach) is the target
Nice to see I can skip watching the game this Sunday. Since it's a foregone conclusion in NE. That's about three hours for new activities.
From an article titled, "Manning's a memory, and Broncos are history":
http://www.csnne.com/new-england-patriots/peyton-mannings-a-memory-and-denver-broncos-are-history
If I was Denver, and I think Godslay would agree with me, I would all week practice like normal and have Manning as the starter...then come Sunday I'd have Brock start. It would cause chaos and totally fuck up the Pats game plan. I hope this doesn't happen because I'd rather Manning play, but it's what I would do if I was Denver.
I won't fight you on Howie, but I'm not going to throw Pederson under the bus before he coaches his first snap. Assuming Schwartz comes in, he'll probably get full control of the defense, which would leave Pederson to focus on the offense. Pederson wasn't my first choice, but until he's lost some games I'm not going to criticize him. The Howie situation sucks, but all things considered things could be a lot worse. We could retain Billy D for example. Andy wasn't beloved as the HC choice when he got the job, but he turned out to be pretty alright if you ask me
As a Patriots fan I disavow this comment and strike it from the record.
Brady has never had that kind of mobility and the ability to throw deep, with accuracy, on the move. Rodgers flicks his wrist and can toss it 40+ yards. Even in Brady's best downfield season, 2007, he never did anything like either of those two throws... Which are two of the best throws in NFL history.
Can someone educate me on Al Saunders?
Browns are interviewing him and people are super hype about this.
Remind me why Howie is the problem again? Because he couldn't get along with Chip (who, btw, seemed unable to get along with a LOT of people)?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUGj5qQFnnc
Brady had momentum, but he throws it almost 70 yards in the air in the SB.
Rodgers makes that throw
Pats offense is going to with their usual death by 1000 cuts against DEN.
Chip away, and then there's a big play here and there. Now that Juls is back, they don't need to panic and push the ball downfield unless it's needed in that given situation. Plus the Pats have some good pass protection going on.
I wonder if Kubes will channel his old school time of possession approach, that ironically, he's tried against Peyton a few times back in the day.
I'd love for Tammy and the Pats to lose after those emails in the off season about PeyPey (even though it's kind of true) would be hilarious. PeyPey vs Tammy, one last time!
The real match up is Denver running game vs Pats D.
I still can't believe we hired fucking Mike Mularky full time. Are you serious? The titans are currently a dumpster fire, and I'm afraid Mariota is on the verge of getting lost in coaching hell.
The ownership and front office is COMPLETELY out of touch. The GM hire is fine, but for HC we interviewed:
Mularky: Terrible win/loss record as a coach, but they were "comfortable" with him
Horton: Our DC, when our defense had a terrible 2nd half of the year. First half was decent likely because of Lebeau.
Teryl Austin: Lions DC, and apparently the rooney rule guy
Jags Assistant HC: The jags. Nothing else needs to be said
And then, they have the gall to hold a press conference and say they don't understand how fans could be disappointed in anyway with the process? Are you fucking kidding me?
"The Titans never spoke with Hue Jackson (now Clevelands head coach), Chip Kelly (49ers), Adam Gase (Dolphins) or Dirk Koetter (Buccaneers). They hired Mularkey despite being in position where they could have waited to talk to New England offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels or Carolina defensive coordinator Sean McDermott."
Enough said right there. Let that fucking sink in and then think they did their due diligence in searching for a HC. Utterly and completely out of touch.
NE radio/TV press are horrible. I'm actually surprised there's a negative article about the broncos. If you listen to sports talk radio around here (which you shouldn't), then it's been 19 weeks of how the Patriots are terrible and should lose every game, and how every bad throw by Brady is proof that he's done, the team is lousy, and belichick is over-rated. I used to listen to one station, 98.5 the Sports Hub, but they've realized that just going hard negative on the Patriots, Bruins, and Red Sox in every show means they get more listeners and more aggressive callers, which means more listeners.
It's brutal
The only segments I really like now are when Toucher & Rich (morning non-sports guys) usually have the radio guy from whatever city the Patriot's are playing that week and it's a good discussion.
After all of this, Lurie looks like the problem. I would have assumed Howie got the boot but it looks like he will keep rolling with him.
Lurie isn't close but he's moving in the direction of Snyder and Jerry as reasons a team isn't doing well. Not as interested in winning.
Pats offense is going to with their usual death by 1000 cuts against DEN.
Chip away, and then there's a big play here and there. Now that Juls is back, they don't need to panic and push the ball downfield unless it's needed in that given situation. Plus the Pats have some good pass protection going on.
I wonder if Kubes will channel his old school time of possession approach, that ironically, he's tried against Peyton a few times back in the day.
I'd love for Tammy and the Pats to lose after those emails in the off season about PeyPey (even though it's kind of true) would be hilarious. PeyPey vs Tammy, one last time!
The real match up is Denver running game vs Pats D.
Can someone educate me on Al Saunders?
Browns are interviewing him and people are super hype about this.
Andy turned out to be alright but the issue is Andy has limitations which were on full display this past weekend in the Chiefs loss to the Patriots. Same weaknesses he had year 1 and now year 17 of his coaching career.
There is a reason why after McNabb was let go and they had no answer at QB, D-coordinator, and talent overall, everything fell apart. Andy couldn't coach the talent up beyond their level. Letting Reid go was the right move for all involved.
The reason Pederson is so infuriating is not that he is a relative unknown, which you pointed out Reid was as well, its that he is directly from Reid. Not even from his tree, but basically a product of Reid in every sense of the word. So only 3 years removed from an era, successful as it may have been, that FAILED, the organization comes across scared, clueless, and almost running back to familiar shelter.
But this time, unlike with Reid, there is no plan (Reid was famous for his binder), Pederson was the 3-4th choice, and this seems more like a move to get back to comfort rather than win. Why revert back to what ultimately didn't work? They don't even have a top 5 pick in a QB friendly draft.
I didn't want Chip fired, but accepting that he was let go, the organization should move forward by bringing in new guys, ideas, and philosophies. Not basically run back to and over turn their own decision to fire Reid.
So yeah as fans all we can do is wait and see but every indication and report about this "coaching search" reeks of desperation lack of real design on where to go next.
Jim Schwartz confirmed Eagles new DC.
Good hire. Only move I have liked so far!
Oh a bunch of players and the idiot owner. I thought you were saying other front office guys. The Eagles have had multiple front office guys leave during Howies reign. Howie is an accountant who lucked his way into a position of power that he clearly doesnt deserve. I have no doubt that there were 9ers players that didnt like Harbs, hell I bet every HC upsets some players just by the nature of their position. As far as the Eagles not having a QB, Bradford had a very good season last year all things considered and even if the Eagles couldnt work out a long term deal for him they could always tag him.
As far as proof that coaches dont want to come here because of Howie there have been a lot of articles lately about that very thing. Here is just one:
NFL executive says Jeffrey Lurie fails to see Howie Roseman is holding the Eagles back:
Last but not least the fact that Dragon agrees with you on something should be proof enough that you are in the wrong.
Roseman oversaw the coaching search along with Lurie and team president Don Smolenski not a football person in sight and it was clear early on that anybody who had ever as much as exchanged an annoyed glance with Howie just wouldnt be contacted. It almost seemed like the No. 1 qualification was being able to co-exist with Howie.
They werent looking for someone who understands offense or knows defense or possesses leadership techniques or coaching experience or motivational ability.
No, a guy who could get along with Howie.
Pats offense is going to with their usual death by 1000 cuts against DEN.
Chip away, and then there's a big play here and there. Now that Juls is back, they don't need to panic and push the ball downfield unless it's needed in that given situation. Plus the Pats have some good pass protection going on.
The real match up is Denver running game vs Pats D.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUGj5qQFnnc
Brady had momentum, but he throws it almost 70 yards in the air in the SB.
They must have two faces then. Everyone I've heard that has come on Denver radio to discuss the game pretty much states otherwise.
The most salient point is that they are happy they get to play Peyton instead of Ben even if they have to travel to Denver. Because he's basically a pushover.
They have a better QB than the Broncos, and with Edelman and Gronk they don't think that the Denver defense can stop them at all. Especially after playing the KC defense.
The defense is good enough to stop any run game, and supposedly gets better since Chandler Jones won't get as many snaps. Additionally Manning won't be able to hit intermediate or deeper routes.
I have yet to hear one analyst say that Denver could actually win, that is from the NE market. One guy basically said (Masseroti(sp)), if Denver was to pull off an unlikely win then he would blame it on Belichick for fucking up the game in Denver, and blowing games against Philadelphia with garbage ST and the game in Miami for not taking them seriously and coming in with a garbage gameplan. Basically saying he busted the season by giving up homefield.
Realistically, I don't care what the analyst say. They very well could be right. That's fine. The arrogance is pretty funny though, but it's how it works in NE. There's no in between. It's either heaven or hell.
Anyone in Giants-GAF interested in going to London for the game? My buddy who I normally do away games once a year with is having his first baby this summer - but I really want to go to this game. All my other friends suck.
I'll buy two game tix now and figure it out later i guess
They must have two faces then. Everyone I've heard that has come on Denver radio to discuss the game pretty much states otherwise.
The most salient point is that they are happy they get to play Peyton instead of Ben even if they have to travel to Denver. Because he's basically a pushover.
They have a better QB than the Broncos, and with Edelman and Gronk they don't think that the Denver defense can stop them at all. Especially after playing the KC defense.
The defense is good enough to stop any run game, and supposedly gets better since Chandler Jones won't get as many snaps. Additionally Manning won't be able to hit intermediate or deeper routes.
I have yet to hear one analyst say that Denver could actually win, that is from the NE market. One guy basically said (Masseroti(sp)), if Denver was to pull off an unlikely win then he would blame it on Belichick for fucking up the game in Denver, and blowing games against Philadelphia with garbage ST and the game in Miami for not taking them seriously and coming in with a garbage gameplan. Basically saying he busted the season by giving up homefield.
Realistically, I don't care what the analyst say. They very well could be right. That's fine. The arrogance is pretty funny though, but it's how it works in NE. There's no in between. It's either heaven or hell.