I guess there is upside to a Kaep trade, but if they don't get him? Draft is an option, but even the top guys are considered developmental
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
NFL 2016 Offseason Thread |OT2| No Country for Old Members
- Thread starter Futurevoid
- Start date
I guess there is upside to a Kaep trade, but if they don't get him? Draft is an option, but even the top guys are considered developmental
Look at the first Superbowl defense in the PM era, and how it was scrapped and rebuilt to what it was last year. That is an example of a defense that was gutted, torn down and rebuilt. Not losing two starters.
Nobody is expecting the same out of the defense next year, as it's incredibly difficult to play at that level yoy. They'll field a good defense, even with those guys gone. Secondary is still good, DL and LBs are largely intact. They'll be fine.
I think it's obvious on the offense, that it's being scrapped and they are going young. More scheme specific too. Boo hoo I guess.
Welcome to the post Manning era. They'll find a guy.
Yeah, up to 10 picks now.
Ok GAF. I need an expert with Photoshop.
What if, in addition to Sanchez, the Broncos sign Johnny football. They would make the perfect cop buddy movie!
Instead of Sanchez having the dirty Sanchez mustache like you would think, put that on Manziel and give him Aviators. Sanchez plays the no nonsense straight cop. Manziel keeps putting them in crazy situations.
What if, in addition to Sanchez, the Broncos sign Johnny football. They would make the perfect cop buddy movie!
Instead of Sanchez having the dirty Sanchez mustache like you would think, put that on Manziel and give him Aviators. Sanchez plays the no nonsense straight cop. Manziel keeps putting them in crazy situations.
Give us the Tebow back we had before your city ruined his perfection!
tiggerkiddo
Member
Well...the offense was horrible so turnover was needed...but man...Sanchize? I gotta figure they will grab another veteran.
I wonder if he can beat Brady as the backup punter.
He's real cheap though. That's the key of it all.
Either that or he's a temporary component to a Kaep deal.
I guess hes guaranteed to avoid getting cut year one which is good for him I guess...
Bronco fans are getting the guy that people think is worse than this
I highly doubt he'll be the starter.
Some rumors are saying that if he's not a vet backup, he'll be a component of a Kaep deal. If Kelly wants Sanchez again, there is no way he'd be able to deal with Philly. Elway picking him up is that bridge.
We'll see what happens though.
Violence Jack
Member
Why does Kaep apparently want to play for the Browns?
Russell is engaged
https://twitter.com/DangeRussWilson/status/708391740680572929
Congrats to him and Ciara
https://twitter.com/DangeRussWilson/status/708391740680572929
Congrats to him and Ciara
Looks like WR ran the wrong route.
WesternHeretic
Member
That's my QB!
Mackenzie 92
Member
Russ!! #Blessed #Great Day
Butts-a-plenty
Banned
Hold up. Individual player bathrobes with numbers on them are a thing? That's pretty terrible.
Geno Future.
PanicFreak
Member
You never know with Tebow. Maybe the receiver was supposed to his route five yards closer to the line of scrimmage or maybe he just threw it into the dirt.
:shrug:
CrocMother
Banned
No Sanchez specifically asked for that in his contract
When the hell did these stupid charts become the be all, end all of QB discussion?
You see a chart and all of the sudden Stafford is terrible? Does that chart take into account his 32nd ranked running game? The fact he was hit about as much as any QB in the league? Or the fact he changed coordinators mid season?
Does the chart show his 19 TD redzone passes and 0 INT ratio?
I think Tannehill is a decent QB, who has some potential, but to even compare his career to Stafford's is a joke. Stafford has had a far more consistent career with less, has had more 4th quarter comebacks than just about any QB since entering the league and is more physically gifted than Tannehill will ever be. Only advantage I would give over Stafford is his running ability.
Pretty funny to see Grigson play it safe as fuck this year lol. If this was last year or two years ago, we would've overpaid like 3 guys past their prime.
What are your trying to say, we talk shit but I thought we were bros.
What are your trying to say, we talk shit but I thought we were bros.
Probably holding the door open for RG3 as he and his posse walks into the Jets HQ.
JaseMath
Member
That ball was tipped though.
Congrats friend, high school was easy for me, but college has been a real bitch. Hope you're ready kiddo!
NFL officially gives the Lions two compensatory picks.
Detroit Lions add 2 compensatory draft picks, now sitting on 10 overall
http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ss...d_2_compensato.html#incart_river_mobile_index
I would almost certainly throw a contract to Russell Okung, even with his injury risks, given our cap space and depth we have and will add through the draft.
Okung plus another high round Tackle would solidify both the LT and RT positions. We're set at Guard the only potential question mark would be Center.
Detroit Lions add 2 compensatory draft picks, now sitting on 10 overall
http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ss...d_2_compensato.html#incart_river_mobile_index
I would almost certainly throw a contract to Russell Okung, even with his injury risks, given our cap space and depth we have and will add through the draft.
Okung plus another high round Tackle would solidify both the LT and RT positions. We're set at Guard the only potential question mark would be Center.
Himynameischris
Member
The_Darkest_Red
Member
Poor Stafford had Megatron while Tannehill was blessed with all time greats Hartline and Wallace at WR1.
Poor Stafford had a bad o-line and got hit a lot while Tannehill had all time greats Dallas Thomas and John Fox blocking for him.
you leave okung alone pal he's coming back to seattle for cheap >:|
I'd rather take my chart of watching Stafford play since 2009 and how he's played given the circumstances of taking over the worst team in NFL history and how the roster was built around him.
CrocMother
Banned
Who will win a playoff game first: Stafford or Tannehill?
rokkerkory
Member
I feel like Bucs are going to be pretty damn competitive this year
Jags too
Jags too
Sweeney Tom
Banned
yankeehater
Member
So the Lions have had 7 years of building a roster around a great QB like Stafford and an all time great WR like Megatron, so why hasnt it worked? Hell even butt fumble won a bunch of playoff games. Has there ever been an all time great QB that finished his career with 0 playoff wins?
Himynameischris
Member
Poor Stafford had Megatron while Tannehill was blessed with all time greats Hartline and Wallace at WR1.
Poor Stafford had a bad o-line and got hit a lot while Tannehill had all time greats Dallas Thomas and John Fox blocking for him.
Don't forget HOF head coach Philbin.
Ah yes the Gif Evaluation, top notch stuff.
Tannehill
When he goes to the Cowboys next year!
PanicFreak
Member
Poor Stafford had Megatron while Tannehill was blessed with all time greats Hartline and Wallace at WR1.
Poor Stafford had a bad o-line and got hit a lot while Tannehill had all time greats Dallas Thomas and John Fox blocking for him.
Stafford has had a raw deal in the NFL. How many other quarterbacks have a guy who can consistently beat double team coverage all day? All of them. Why couldn't Megatron consistently beat triple team coverage and help Stafford out once and a while?
What a bum.
Similar threads
- Locked