None of those plays is spectacular.
The first two are very good throws where he has plenty of protection and delivers a ball that really an NFL qb us support to deliver. The 2nd one was more impressive than the first but it is a throw we have seen almost every starting qb make. I have even seen Cleveland qb's make both of those throws.
The 3rd play is an exciting play but not really because of Brady. The receiver was 20 yards open and the ball was underthrown but it made no difference because of how badly the Steelers bit on it.
The last one was just a throw to someone in stride.
These are not spectacular plays. Its a qb with a clean pocket delivering the ball. You can argue that it was more impressive because of the pressure involved with some of them, but there was nothing inherently amazing about the throws or the qb play. If you want to see a truly spectacular throw from a qb go look up some of Peytons deep passes in his prime. I have not seen anyone who can replicate his ridiculous timing and accuracy in breaking down cover 2 before or since then. It was like a videogame.
Also, don't ever say that I buy furniture from IKEA like some Tabris. I won't hesitate to throw hands. My knees are not hurting at this exact moment so that makes me a dangerous man (at least until tomorrow when they will probably hurt again).
Only truth now: the Pats have a great system, but it really isn't Brady who makes it go. Brady is a very good cog within the system, but the system itself starts at the line of scrimmage. Belicheat's entire scheme is based on controlling LoS.
It's why you have guys like Blount, BJGE, White--mediocre RBs anywhere else--excelling in NE. Thinking back, it's really only Curtis Martin who might be considered a perennial Pro Bowler/future HoFer at RB from NE. Basically, plug in just about anyone and they'll run through gaping holes created by that OL for 5/6/7 yards.
That sets up short distance 2nd and 3rd downs, which allows Brady to zip the ball to the fast, little, scrappy dude (exhibit A: Edelman, exhibit B: Welker, exhibit C: Troy Brown) who can run his little 2-3 yard underneath crossing pattern (with help from pick plays/interfering TEs/etc).
Brady typically has all day to throw the ball. But as has been said, Brady is 180-52 (77% win pct) in regular season games. Without him they're 14-6 (70%).
Bottom line: in the system the Pats run, Brady makes the team 7% better than they are without him.
Gronk is the real difference here, by the way. He's a matchup nightmare. But again, even without him, the game isn't being won by Brady or Edelman or Blount, it's being won at the line of scrimmage. And just like Trump, Bill won't mention them because he wants you to focus on Blount, on Gronk, on Edelman, on Brady. He's making you focus on individual players, when he is winning the game with his OL playing as a unit.
Also, on defense, the Pats play completely differently between the 20s than they do inside the RZ. Their entire goal is to hold you to FGs while they score TDs.
When Denver beat NE in the AFCCG, it was because they won in the trenches. They controlled the LoS, kept it to 3rd and long, hit Brady because he had to allow for longer routes. Miller destroyed their RT (can't remember his name).
Find the team that can not only get to Brady but can stop the run game, control the LoS, and you have the team that can take them. And even then, it's gonna be close. Also, don't fucking kick FGs. The only time you kick a FG against the Trumpriots is if there are 5 seconds left in the game and a FG wins it for you. That's it. Otherwise, go all Madden on them and go for TDs.