https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C3Yw_2oWEAAF6y-.jpg:large[IMG]
I think he will do ok and make my boy FMT happy![/QUOTE]
Made a small update to the announcement for reality:
[img]http://i.imgur.com/cOqQt9S.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C3Yw_2oWEAAF6y-.jpg:large[IMG]
I think he will do ok and make my boy FMT happy![/QUOTE]
Made a small update to the announcement for reality:
[img]http://i.imgur.com/cOqQt9S.jpg
:lolMade a small update to the announcement for reality:
Made a small update to the announcement for reality:
Yes. Glad someone else sees it, stop being tomfools.Man half the regulars here are gonna be banned in that SB thread
Man half the regulars here are gonna be banned in that SB thread
We did it, DM.
I think he will do ok and make my boy FMT happy!
And getting got riled upYou guys talking about the Pats = Trumps stuff getting people got?
Quite a few people got banned from that brawl lolHow many in here got caught up in the emotion from the Bruce Irvin brawl in XLIX? I know CrocMother and I were got.
You guys talking about the Pats = Trumps stuff getting people got?
I said the current Pats are not what I considered a dynasty. Lifelongs everywhere! Their version of Patriots "history" started in 2001
Made a small update to the announcement for reality:
Exactly what are his qualifications?
Exactly what are his qualifications?
It doesn't matter who our gm is, he would have no power anyways
FMT is an official JoyConBoyz.Hahahaha I told you FMT your franchise is worse than my garbage franchise and now I have proof!
FMT is an official JoyConBoyz.
We don't give a fuck!
Six year contract for a guy with zero player personnel experience? 49ers are fucking crazy
if they were going to hire someone completely unqualified for the GM job they could have at least given it to J-Gar.
QB coach!
He's white and he used to play.
Garcia would suck as GM though.
So would John Lynch, though here we are.
Garcia would suck as GM though.
What do you think is generally the cushiest job in the coach/FO heirarchy
They don't have a QB to coach yet. I feel like his skills would have translated better to the GM job. He could have shown up to meetings with agents shirtless.
Well...you're presenting an argument that needs to define a "dynasty" I suppose.
I always kinda assumed most of the sports media view the Pats as a dynasty because it's still Brady/Belichick at the end of the day.
There's just not a lot of comparison points I don't think. Nobody else had a dynasty and then won a Super Bowl several years later with the same quarterback/coach combo.
See, a Dynasty has always been defined thusly - large amount of championships, short amount of time.
Steelers, Niners, Cowboys, Early 2000's Cheating Asterisks, all dynasties.
Now all of a sudden people (well, the media and Asterisks fans) want to change the definition from what it's always been known for and add things like multiple AFC Championship and Super Bowl appearances and regular season accolades. Asterisks won three Super Bowls in 4 years. That was a dynasty. This current team is not a dynasty. Not only does it not have anything to do with the early aughts teams aside from Belichick and Brady, it's also won only one championship, 11 years after the last one. That is not a dynasty by any definition. Multiple AFC Championship appearances and even Super Bowl appearances are not championships. If they were the freaking Bills had a dynasty.
I attend a lot of events where the national anthem is sung. Feels hollow.I became a US Citizen at the best/worst possible time....crazy
See, a Dynasty has always been defined thusly - large amount of championships, short amount of time.
Steelers, Niners, Cowboys, Early 2000's Cheating Asterisks, all dynasties.
Now all of a sudden people (well, the media and Asterisks fans) want to change the definition from what it's always been known for and add things like multiple AFC Championship appearances and regular season accolades. Asterisks won three Super Bowls in 4 years. That was a dynasty. This current team is not a dynasty. Not only does it not have anything to do with the early aughts teams aside from Belichick and Brady, it's also one won one championship, That is not a dynasty by any definition. Multiple AFC Championship appearances are not championships.
They're beyond a dynasty is another way to look at it. These guys are basically up there in the same tier as the Celtics/Lakers/Yankees at the height of their power. The Spurs are another decent modern example.
What the Pats and Spurs do in this era of free agency/salary cap is basically unthinkable. It's not to say those other teams listed didn't draft well or hold onto their players well/caught lucky breaks, it's that these two teams did it in a system designed to keep such a run from happening.
In the Pats case some people claim that oh, their division was always crappy. It wasn't at the start of the run, the Bills and Jets were good. Despite how much they bitch and moan the Jets have actually been pretty good all century so far. Only once or twice did the AFC east have the worst team in all of football in it and most years the other three teams hovered around five hundred despite probably losing to the Pats twice. AFC East has also never once been the worst division in the Brady era, though it got pretty close a few years ago.
Football is especially cruel to teams who keep winning. Like the other sports it means you pick last in the first round but also your schedule becomes harder the better you do. Why did we see Brady and Manning almost twenty times despite them not being in the same division? Because they were almost always on the number one team and had the number one schedule. The Pats have not picked in the top ten without trading up since 2001.
Hiya buddyGood morning friends
Exactly what are his qualifications?