Corran Horn
May the Schwartz be with you
Did any of you watch Undressed back in the day?
Oh god memories lol
Did any of you watch Undressed back in the day?
Oh god memories lol
Yeah, I actually like Asheville. It's tons better than my town I'm currently in, Hickory.
It's only a two week ban, so at least he's not gonna miss anything important.
Aaron Wilson said:Jim harbaugh 'I always felt in my heart that our quarterback would be alex smith alex smith is a 49er'.
I wish the city bus ran later here, I want to see Childish Gambino (Donald Glover from Community) in July but I don't want to pay for a taxi or fucking walk all the way home.
Did any of you guys use the PS3 NFL streaming app last year? I'm considering dumping DirecTV and just cutting to cord altogether but I remember hearing some negatives about it when it launched.
Rumors of Jonathan Stewart to the Giants.
Good lord that would be hot sex.
Rumors of Jonathan Stewart to the Giants.
Good lord that would be hot sex.
Canadian Press already salivating at the thought of Tebow being forced to pursue a CFL career.
Coughlin says Osi will definitely be a Giant in 2012. "I'm not thinking of anything else" other than Umenyiora returning to the team.
Coughlin says bringing Brandon Jacobs back "is a possibility."
An NY writer asked Coughlin if he could imagine taking his QB off field 20 plays/gm? Coughlin: "Not our quarterback."
Yeah, I would think so, Fisher said, via Mary Kay Cabot of the Cleveland Plain-Dealer. I dont know if wed consider going that high. Those conversations arent going to take place until draft day because your guys got to be there. Itll be interesting to see what kind of compensation they want. Were very happy with the compensation weve got right now over the next couple of years.
If the Rams did move back up to the fourth pick, it would likely be a bid to get Oklahoma State wide receiver Justin Blackmon. Assuming they like him, the Browns could then take Texas A&M QB Ryan Tannehill with the sixth pick while picking up something extra for their trouble. That whole scenario could get complicated if the Dolphins were to move up for their own shot at Tannehill, but well try to keep the wild speculation about something that will happen a month from now at a minimum.
Fisher said theres a good chance the Rams will move up or move down from the sixth spot come draft day. He also said that the team fielded trade offers for Sam Bradford. Its not known if the Browns were one of the bidders, although Pat Shurmurs history with Bradford suggests that they might have thrown the idea in the Rams direction at some point.
I still don't get why we needed to pick up Tolbert (and why we needed to get rid of one of the Super Twins, especially the more productive one in recent years).
But yeah, JStew on the Giants would be pretty ridiculous. He's a consistent, powerful downhill runner with surprising speed for his size. He's also a decent blocker and a pretty good option catching balls out of the backfield. Plus he's a 25 year-old back without a great deal of mileage on those legs, because he's played in a platoon with at least one other back for his entire career. Him in New York would be a scary thought for the rest of the NFC East.
Rams possibly looking to move up to the #4 slot in the draft and they fielded trade offers for Bradford...
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...s-browns-a-potential-draft-day-trade-partner/
Rams possibly looking to move up to the #4 slot in the draft and they fielded trade offers for Bradford...
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...s-browns-a-potential-draft-day-trade-partner/
If Browns trade for Bradford that will be lol as fuck.
Doubtful it happens. Fisher is pretty adamant on having a "franchise" player in place at the position and while the Rams may have fielded offers, I'm willing to bet very little true consideration was given to them unless some team comes to the table with a truly exceptional (i.e. Redskins for RGIII level) trade. The Browns have the picks to do that mind you but it's a long shot. Stranger things have happened though...darkside31337 said:Haha this is so ridiculous. I thought nobody in the league wanted to trade for Bradford?
Why take Tannehill over RG3 if that's the case? Tannehill is a reach at #2 especially with RGIII on the board. Hell, some would argue he's a reach at #4 but considering how QB starved some teams are, the fact that some view Tannehill as a top 10 tallent and the run we saw on fairly average prospects last season (Tannehill is more talented than Ponder who went at #12, IMHO), some team will reach for him. Better to move down if you're going to do that and take the big old chest of gold the Redskins handed them.darkside31337 said:And if they really wanted Tannehill they might have been better off keeping the #2 pick.
Rams possibly looking to move up to the #4 slot in the draft and they fielded trade offers for Bradford...
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...s-browns-a-potential-draft-day-trade-partner/
Doubtful it happens. Fisher is pretty adamant on having a "franchise" player in place at the position and while the Rams may have fielded offers, I'm willing to bet very little true consideration was given to them unless some team comes to the table with a truly exceptional (i.e. Redskins for RGIII level) trade.
Depends on the view they have of Bradford. More specifically, the view Fisher has of his QB. Is he a failed quarterback or a guy who has absolutely nothing around him? No offensive line to protect so he was often sacked and injured (one of the highest if not the most sacked in the league?). No wide receivers and offensive coordinator changes that stunted his development, etc. So it is the QB or the organization around him that failed?eznark said:Why waste a year with a failed quarterback?
I agree, though Young was a head case that Fisher never wanted as mentioned. Bradford has been mentioned as one of the reasons Fisher took the job in St. Louis.eznark said:Remember, he was stuck in Tennessee for the last few years with a "franchise" quarterback that he knew sucked and wanted nothing to do with. I doubt he really relishes the same situation.
Rams ditching Bradford would be too good to be true...it's not happening, his contract is still insane isn't it?
Depends on the view they have of Bradford. Is he a failed quarterback or a guy who has absolutely nothing around him? No offensive line to protect so he was often sacked and injured. No wide receivers and offensive coordinator changes that stunted his development, etc. So it is the QB or the organization around him that failed?
Bradford has been mentioned as one of the reasons Fisher took the job in St. Louis.
His contract was 6 years, $78 million with $50 million guaranteed
That Kid Icarus game sounds fun.
I don't want to spend that kind of money on a 3DS though, not until it gets more games. Be interesting to see if the 3DS can follow in the DS' footsteps (best system last gen).
I'm about to buy a plane ticket to China and go juggernaut on my idiot co-workers over there. FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2012/02/25/fisher-bradford-not-going-anywhere/eznark said:I never heard that.
There had been some speculation that the Rams would consider trading quarterback Sam Bradford after his disappointing sophomore season in 2011. But Fisher, who chose St. Louis over Miami largely because of Bradford’s presence on the Rams’ roster, put a rest to those rumors here at the combine.
“That wouldn’t be an option,” he said.
Fisher had been courted by both the Rams and the Miami Dolphins, but in the end apparently spurned more money from the Dolphins because of the situation with the Rams. A source indicated to NFP that the Dolphins would have been willing to give Fisher up to $8 million to be their coach.
Even though the Rams finished 2-14 this season, there are some aspects to their organizational structure that likely swayed Fisher in their direction. First, St. Louis has a potential franchise quarterback in place in Sam Bradford, the first overall pick in 2010.
That Kid Icarus game sounds fun.
I don't want to spend that kind of money on a 3DS though, not until it gets more games. Be interesting to see if the 3DS can follow in the DS' footsteps (best system last gen).
http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2012/02/25/fisher-bradford-not-going-anywhere/
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Fisher-chooses-Rams-over-Dolphins.html
There's a few other places it's mentioned along with statements from Fisher reinforcing the notion (along with more organizational control of course) and his strong comments that he has no intention of trading Bradford. Whether that view has seriously changed or not apparently remains to be seen.
:jnceznark said:huh, weird. Maybe people in the organization have shown him the light.
:jnc
In all seriousness, do you feel Bradford is really that bad?
Lovie Smith said:I dont want to picture it as were looking for a left tackle, Smith said in a breakfast with the media at the NFL meetings. We feel comfortable with the two guys (JMarcus Webb and Gabe Carimi) we started with last year. We like the group of offensive lineman we have right now. We feel we can be successful with them. That being said, if someone can improve us, well look at them."
Any tackle in the league can look bad at times, Smith said. There are some things we can do to help him out at times, which we plan to do. We feel we have a good plan at the left tackle position. If we end up playing JMarcus Webb at the left tackle position, we feel comfortable with that.
Fair enough.eznark said:I do. I don't know if he would have been that bad in different circumstances, however his current situation has broken him. It's tough to turn a guys confidence around. I was never high on him to begin with, though. He struggles to make reads and when given time, he panics and struggles to find open receivers.
A good quarterback can make the players around him better. An average quarterback needs good players around him to succeed. Bradford has the pysical tools to be successful, but that is such a minor part of being successful at the position that I don't see him ever being able to take advantage of them.
Never said they were mutually exclusive.DeaconKnowledge said:Can't it be both?
Can't it be both?Depends on the view they have of Bradford. More specifically, the view Fisher has of his QB. Is he a failed quarterback or a guy who has absolutely nothing around him? No offensive line to protect so he was often sacked and injured (one of the highest if not the most sacked in the league?). No wide receivers and offensive coordinator changes that stunted his development, etc. So it is the QB or the organization around him that failed?
Fair enough.
I agree with you on him being broken due to the situation around him and he's on the same career track as David Carr to me at the moment (shellshocked and even worse without a stable offense). I'd like see him in a more optimal situation to see if there is something to salvage there though. I think Fisher could do that for him.
Not this shit again. Life Support Lovie says the Bears are happy with their current offensive line. Story here.
smh at the bold. if that human piece of shit named Jamarcus Webb is still starting at LT next year, might as well give up on the season before it starts.
If you don't have an offensive mastermind Mike Martz anymore I think suddenly your O Line will look much better