Somebody is going to lose a finger in that facemask.
If he dies he dies.
Somebody is going to lose a finger in that facemask.
Somebody is going to lose a finger in that facemask.
Worst Football Update:
Holland is going down tonight. Sorry, Dutch.
He was fairly quiet in the 2012 meeting vs. New England in their post-season game, but I do remember him ripping apart the Pats in the 2009 playoff game. I know damn well Flacco sucked monkey nuts that game, too, so I decided to look up stats from it.Ray Rice is 50%+ of our Off but in most playoff games he's below avg.
He was fairly quiet in the 2012 meeting vs. New England in their post-season game, but I do remember him ripping apart the Pats in the 2009 playoff game. I know damn well Flacco sucked monkey nuts that game, too, so I decided to look up stats from it.
Flacco: 4/10, 34 yards, INT
Rice: 22 car., 159 yards, 2 TD's
Flacco had two completions to wide receivers. Barely above Alex Smith level!
Ray Rice is 50%+ of our Off but in most playoff games he's below avg.
Michael Jackson with tiny dreads?
Greg Cossel has mentioned this, but every single critic would have a different opinion of Flacco if Lee Evans just catches that ball. That NE defense was playing well and handled NYG pretty well 2 weeks later. But Flacco drove his team down the field at the end of the game and made a great throw in a clutch moment. That throw took a big arm and great accuracy and he made it.
To me he's there with Cutler and maybe Romo to a lesser extent as guys who get knocked for stuff that isn't always their fault, and are guys you can win a SB with and not in the Alex Smith game manager type of way where you just hope they don't ruin it. They can be positive influences on the outcomes of big games
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap...Kk8jkA?docId=84ddd76ac1194495b88f8244313bab0dCHICAGO (AP) Pop Warner football players won't be taking quite as many hits from now on.
The youth organization said it is limiting contact in practice to try and make the game safer for young players starting this year.
It said coaches must limit contact to no more than one-third of their practice time. It is also banning full-speed, head-on blocking or tackling drills in which players line up more than 3 yards apart. The organization says coaches can have full-speed drills where players approach each other at an angle but "not straight ahead into each other." It also says there should be no head-to-head contact.
The rule changes announced Tuesday were developed by Pop Warner's medical advisory board as part of its effort to reduce the risk of concussions.
Pop Warner said it is the "first youth sports organization to limit contact in practice."
The long-term health effects of repeated blows to the head have become a major issue for the NFL, which is being sued by more than 2,000 retirees, and the concern has been trickling down to the lower levels of the games.
Some parents have voiced worry about letting their children play football, and the National Sporting Goods Association and the National Federation of State High School Associations have each recorded very slight declines in participation in recent years though doctors are reluctant to declare the changes a trend just yet.
"We have been very vocal on this issue over the past two years because the health and safety of our young players is always our number one priority," said Pop Warner executive director Jon Butler said. "By instituting these new rules and providing our coaches with proper tackling training and education in concussion awareness and prevention, we aim to equip our members with the tools they need to safely participate in the game they love."
More than 400,000 children in 43 states along with Scotland, Germany, Russia, Japan and Mexico participate in Pop Warner Little Scholars' football, cheerleading and dance programs.
"Pop Warner's rule changes are based on research that shows that more concussions occur in practice than during games," said Dr. Julian Bailes, chairman of the Pop Warner medical advisory board. "The impact of head-to-head contact causes the most severe concussions, so we felt it was imperative that Pop Warner take a proactive approach and limit contact in practices."
Greg Cossel has mentioned this, but every single critic would have a different opinion of Flacco if Lee Evans just catches that ball. That NE defense was playing well and handled NYG pretty well 2 weeks later. But Flacco drove his team down the field at the end of the game and made a great throw in a clutch moment. That throw took a big arm and great accuracy and he made it.
To me he's there with Cutler and maybe Romo to a lesser extent as guys who get knocked for stuff that isn't always their fault, and are guys you can win a SB with and not in the Alex Smith game manager type of way where you just hope they don't ruin it. They can be positive influences on the outcomes of big games
Image title says it's RG3
Greg Cossel has mentioned this, but every single critic would have a different opinion of Flacco if Lee Evans just catches that ball. That NE defense was playing well and handled NYG pretty well 2 weeks later. But Flacco drove his team down the field at the end of the game and made a great throw in a clutch moment. That throw took a big arm and great accuracy and he made it.
To me he's there with Cutler and maybe Romo to a lesser extent as guys who get knocked for stuff that isn't always their fault, and are guys you can win a SB with and not in the Alex Smith game manager type of way where you just hope they don't ruin it. They can be positive influences on the outcomes of big games
Image title says it's RG3
I'd tend to agree. I think it's hard to discern just how good/bad Flacco is.
- He's in an offense that is definitely geared towards smash-mouth football.
- He's in a tough defensive minded division.
- He's had jack-squat to work with at the receiver position.
He's drove the offense down the field in the playoffs twice in a row, just to have a bum WR drop it... If either of those WR's catch that ball, there's a chance that the Ravens have 2 additional rings. And as you stated, he'd be viewed differently.
And if Flacco had made some throws earlier in the game it wouldnt have come down to the final possession both times. Flacco played well enough to give them a chance to win but he didnt play great and take the win even though they had plenty of chances.
I'd tend to agree. I think it's hard to discern just how good/bad Flacco is.
- He's in an offense that is definitely geared towards smash-mouth football.
- He's in a tough defensive minded division.
- He's had jack-squat to work with at the receiver position.
He's drove the offense down the field in the playoffs twice in a row, just to have a bum WR drop it... If either of those WR's catch that ball, there's a chance that the Ravens have 2 additional rings. And as you stated, he'd be viewed differently.
I'd tend to agree. I think it's hard to discern just how good/bad Flacco is.
- He's in an offense that is definitely geared towards smash-mouth football.
And if Flacco had made some throws earlier in the game it wouldnt have come down to the final possession both times. Flacco played well enough to give them a chance to win but he didnt play great and take the win even though they had plenty of chances.
So, his coaches, who see him every single day, feel that the best way to win with him at QB is to pass as infrequently as possible and that is a mark in his favor?
:jnc
Flacco has played in 9 playoff games. He has been abysmally shitty in 6 of those. Let's not pretend that he was infallible but for two dropped passes.
Yeah just really mediocre WRs, though at least Torrey Smith can stretch the field for them now. And I doubt anyone here would want Cam Cameron as an offensive coordinator
That can be said about any/every player on the team. In addition, we don't know what the routes were, or what the play call was and where fault truly lies in those earlier plays.
What we do know is that for two consecutive years, Flacco has thrown catchable passes to win games in the 4th quarter when it matters. And in both instances, his teammates failed him. I'm not a Raven fan by any means, but that's just how I see it.
Uncle Roger's vision for the future of the NFL?
Not that Flacco is Eli good, but what if Manningham doesn't catch that pass? Eli had his own struggles that game. But he made a great throw into a tight window and in a big moment, only his guy caught it. So is Eli no longer a sure HoF QB if Manningham drops it?
He was fucking garbage in that Pittsburgh game. Don't give me "but for one pass" bullshit. He threw for 125 yards on checkdowns and even then only completing about 50%.
If Manningham doesn't make that catch...it's second down and the Giants still have a ton of time to drive down field for a field goal. It was a huge catch in that it gave the Giants a ton of momentum, but there's nothing to say the Eli still doesn't win that game even if it gets dropped. I appreciate what you're trying to say, it's just not an especially valid example.
If Manningham doesn't make that catch...it's second down and the Giants still have a ton of time to drive down field for a field goal. It was a huge catch in that it gave the Giants a ton of momentum, but there's nothing to say the Eli still doesn't win that game even if it gets dropped. I appreciate what you're trying to say, it's just not an especially valid example.
Uncle Roger's vision for the future of the NFL?
I think it's apparent that you're way more passionate about this discussion than I am. LMAO. I have no horse in this race.
As an outsider looking in, I saw a QB put his team in position to win and his WR failed him for two consecutive years. You can scream about quarters 1-3 all day long but in the 4th, when it mattered, he rose to the occasion. People rag on Lebron for being hot in quarters 1-3 and disappearing in the 4th. True, a loss is a loss at the end of the day. But, Flacco played well when it mattered. I'm not even saying that you're wrong, really... LOL
I believe Mario had two terribly run routes in that game before his memorable catch later on the final drive. He should take lessons from what Steve Smith and Amani Toomer had down pat, and that's patrolling the sidelines. That's one where Mario finally got it to hold on and get both feet down.While it's true that it doesn't mean Eli doesn't win the game, I don't think we should undervalue the importance of momentum in an NFL game. It's darn near everything!
:lol :lol :lol
Holy shit at the Flacco apologists. I thought there was only one person in the world that thought Flacco was any good (that being Flacco who anointed himself elite and probably is a 5 time SB champion in his mind as well).
Now I find that GAF is populated with Flacco lovers?
I think it is telling that Flacco's biggest fans are Redskin and Texans fans. Tells me more about their teams than it does about Flacco.Honestly I'm more stunned that only the fourth quarter matters.
So . . . Flacco's throw was better b/c of the game situation?
Flacco is a top 5 QB in the league? Top 10? It's not that hard to put him outside the top 15, in which case why the hell is anyone even trying to defend him?
Yes when you win big games people see you differently. But no one gives a fuck if you almost won the game.As far as a qualitative assessment, all I've said was that his critics would view him differently had Evans caught that pass, he wasn't Eli good, and that he can be a positive contributor to an offense. My main point is that I view the criticisms of him as "un-clutch" and as a hindrance to the Ravens' fortunes untrue
Tom Brady is one of the 5 best QBs to ever play, and he had two giant stinkers in last year's playoffs. Is he now not elite, even though he carried that team as far as they went?
Schaub was out, AJ was out, and Foster still tore it up. Both running and receiving. Before Chris Johnson quit football he was the same
edit: I had no idea that Bourne thing was coming out so soon. Ed Norton and Renner? Could be good. He's not a clone is he?
Tom Brady is one of the 5 best QBs to ever play, and he had two giant stinkers in last year's playoffs. Is he now not elite, even though he carried that team as far as they went?
Tom doesn't even make as much money as his wife!
I am pretty sure ALL elite qb's support their wives. Only bitches like Brady and Hasselbald have their wives pay for dinner.
I bet Giselle lets Tom watch football and play video games when he wants though.
I bet Giselle lets Tom watch football and play video games when he wants though.
True, but we both know that those kids are not his.I bet Giselle lets Tom watch football and play video games when he wants though.
True, but we both know that those kids are not his.
I love my kids and don't mind helping out as needed.
Also, there are no strap ons allowed in my bedroom. Unlike Tom and Giselle I don't need one!
This isn't an oversimplification of the Super Bowl at all.What 's our definition of elite again?
Press Tom's receivers and he folds. This isn't 2007 where Tom could do it all.