Not arguing dude. Got nothing to do today. And Slay didnt do anything. Everyone keeps reading his post but not mine he originally quoted. Peyton and Brady at similar stats.
Brady didnt have an int or fumble lost. I even bring it up before Slay, who fell for my Flacco fact check the day before, switched the passing stats. Brady didnt deserve the mvp until he had a game winning drive to win. Colts were winning for 95% of the game.
Didnt change my point that the rb or a defensive player should have been the mvp for colts v bears. Which, slay quotes an article saying the exact same thing.
Fell for your fact check. Come on bro, you stated that Flacco had 0, and I said math is hard. Implicitly that means that I knew Flacco had 1 ring.
My point was Peyton and Brady had similar games and they both won the MVP for those respective Superbowls. You went hard trying to show that Brady's swapped stats (Manning's actual stats) were better than Manning's (Brady's actual stats) and that they weren't equivalent, basically ballwashing Tom's imaginary SB stats.
My argument was basically that Rhodes could have won MVP because he took the game over. Addai also had merit but less so. Peyton had early mistakes but recovered, and put together championship drives with the offense. QBs always are more important and likely more valuable. If they put together a decent game (which Manning did by your own admission), they are most likely to win it.
The article I posted was in reference to Rhodes over Addai as MVP (which was the initial argument). Manning also deserved it, as it's more skewed towards QBs.
For the record I also wanted the Bears to beat the Colts in that game. I didn't even like Peyton at that point.