Not on the offensive side of things, no.
Well, in recent history. I was a little boy in the late 90's
Where are you from ?
Not on the offensive side of things, no.
Well, in recent history. I was a little boy in the late 90's
Not on the offensive side of things, no.
Well, in recent history. I was a little boy in the late 90's
Not on the offensive side of things, no.
Well, in recent history. I was a little boy in the late 90's
Did you succeed in erasing the memory of T*m throwing Welker a shit pass in Pats-Giants II?
Peyton hasn't performed that great in Superbowls.That was sweet overthrow by Brady.
Not on the offensive side of things, no.
Well, in recent history. I was a little boy in the late 90's
Peyton hasn't performed that great in Superbowls.
He didn't have flat balls and cameras either. Give him those advantages and the dude would be undefeated.
He didn't have flat balls and cameras either. Give him those advantages and the dude would be undefeated.
Putting up only 14 points in the Super Bowl after being one of the most prolific offenses in NFL history isn't a choke job?
Even if you blame Welker for the SB46 incompletion (which is ridiculous, that was all Tom's fault), how is he not on the "offensive side of things"?
The most prolific offense ever only scoring 8 points in a Superbowl. Even the jags and titans scored more against Seattle smh.He didn't have flat balls and cameras either. Give him those advantages and the dude would be undefeated.
Giants have always been one of the toughest opponents in the current era/
I wouldn't call that "choking", choking to me is having a perfect oppourtunity to win and doing something rediculously bad and throwing it away.
Which , if you want to view the Welker throw as a choke you can do that if you want. Throw was high but not high enough to be impossible to catch and Welker had his hand on the ball, he makes that catch 80 times out of 100.
What is choking if not performing significantly below your prior standard when you finally get to the biggest stage? That is basically the textbook definition and precisely what the Patriots did in 2008.
The most prolific offense ever only scoring 8 points in a Superbowl. Even the jags and titans scored more against Seattle smh.
Peyton hasn't performed that great in Superbowls.
I found a picture of Brady wearing all of his legitimate rings:That doesn't hurt anymore.
Brady has his fourth ring. You have no power here.
3 TD's and 4 INT's isn't that bad in 3 games.
aww yeah I finally got some more Bundaberg ginger beer.
World Market closed in March to move to a new location down the road and they finally reopened and restocked. Time to enjoy.
The most prolific offense ever only scoring 8 points in a Superbowl. Even the jags and titans scored more against Seattle smh.
Hey Cajun. I got a sub today and the guy who owns the sub shop is a big Saints fan. He called it bullshit that our coach got off with nothing over deflategate. I thought of you.
Gata... that is a low blow. It's permissible here, but just barely.
The Broncos were just frauds I guess.Yeah they also faced the best defense we've seen in a long time. Seattle was also the #1 seed that year.
Giants had a pretty good Dline, and that's about it. They are remembered more for how unremarkable they were. Brady got shut down by a bunch of guys who really had no business being there. No offense to the Giants of course.
Seems the same, but Seattle was more talented and better than that Giants team was. At least on paper.
So Brady's choke was larger simply looking at those facts.
Hey Cajun. I got a sub today and the guy who owns the sub shop is a big Saints fan. He called it bullshit that our coach got off with nothing over deflategate. I thought of you.
Gata... that is a low blow. It's permissible here, but just barely.
The Broncos were just frauds I guess.
Not on the offensive side of things, no.
Well, in recent history. I was a little boy in the late 90's
Boom goes the dynamite.Better a fraud year, then a fraud franchise.
You would be an expert on frauds.Better a fraud year, then a fraud franchise.
So this was your first Super Bowl, then?
Gata you have competition for youngest bandwagon fan.
Done with my finals, now I can make more disrespectful gifs!
You would be an expert on frauds.
Done with my finals, now I can make more disrespectful gifs!
Done with my finals, now I can make more disrespectful gifs!
So this was your first Super Bowl, then?
Gata you have competition for youngest bandwagon fan.
First Superbowl I watched was 2001, I was in the second grade.
Just make sure the Patriots logo is on the badge.I do have extensive knowledge of the Patriots methodologies and practices. Especially after seeing McDaniels here.
If that makes me an expert on your team I will wear that badge proudly.
The arrogance never ends.
Better a fraud year, then a fraud franchise.
Have you asked your parents for permission to use the internet to post here?
A Texans fan asking a Jags fan to make an avatar.
What could possibly go wrong?
It feels like Thursday in here, but it's against the pats so it beautiful
#fuckthepats
#17-0>18-1
I really have no animosity towards the Jags. Tacks and Colts? Oh hell yeah!
Stings too because I actually like Spin and SF2fanatic
I really have no animosity towards the Jags. Tacks and Colts? Oh hell yeah!