Fellowship is great. No qualifier needed. But the other two and your thoughts on King Kong, God did KK suck balls, are pretty close to mine
Yeah, I think Fellowship ends up being great anyway, mostly because they just cut stuff. And the first half of the book is very much world-building anyway (hobbits, barrow downs, Bombadil, etc), which could be cut without affecting the story at large.
What are you referring to?
I haven't watched them in awhile but I really like how they developed Aragorn and Arwen's romance to mirror Beren and Luthien. If anything Aragorn isn't developed enough but that helped.
Well, the Treebeard thing! The ents flooding Isengard had to be delayed for a triple-climax at the end of the movie, which meant the ents had to stall for time by talking very slowly.
The drama with Aragorn getting lost or falling off a cliff or whatever happened to him was forgettable and pointless. The Aragorn and Arwen stuff was boring, and largely redundant given some of what made it into RotK.
Frodo and Sam's sidetrip to Osgiliath came across as an effort to get more use out of that sweet set.
I'm sure there are more, but the net result was like an hour of additions that are largely unimportant to the plot. So they moved the cliffhanger ending of TT into RotK, and that movie ended up feeling rushed (at almost 3 and a half hours!) because you can only cut so much and still keep a coherent narrative.