Futurevoid
Member
What? You don't remember?Alligatorjandro said:wtf is snow?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDQAmuZ8t94
How are you a Pats fan again?
What? You don't remember?Alligatorjandro said:wtf is snow?
Those Pats loses seem so far away now, though. They are hot right now.Not saying that at all, but the Pats have lost to 2 NFCW teams already and now they are playing the best that the NFCW has to offer.
Went to school at Northwestern. Stayed in Chicago for a few years. Just moved to Ann Arbor to secretly undermine Fatty Hoke's regime.Are you a secret 'sconi?
He isn't.
You curse your own team by calling me a Jags fan.
It's crazy how close the Pats play divisional games. In their seven game win streak they've won by an average of 34 points over non-divisional teams (3 games) and only 11 points over teams in their division (4 games). And the Jets, Dolphins, and Bills aren't exactly tearing it up this year.
Those Pats loses seem so far away now, though. They are hot right now.
So is Jeff Fischer really the defensive guru that people think he is? I mean, it's no secret what the Viking's offensive strategy is going to be...
Went to school at Northwestern. Stayed in Chicago for a few years. Just moved to Ann Arbor to secretly undermine Fatty Hoke's regime.
Squicken, you're older than most of us in this thread. You of all people should know that it's fucking rare to win a SB - think of all that greats that never managed to get there.
Here are just a few examples of what some recent Super Bowl champions looked like at this point in the season:
The 2011 Giants: The G-Men gave up 49 points to New Orleans, 38 to Green Bay, 34 to the Cowboys, and then lost 23-10 to the Redskins who led 23-3 until late with Rex Grossman at quarterback. It was their fifth loss in six games, with only two games remaining in the season they were 7-7. Beat the Patriots in the Super Bowl.
The 2009 Saints: scored points in losses to Dallas and Tampa Bay, then lost the season finale when they didn’t play more of their starters. Yet, scored 45, 31, 31 points in Super Bowl run.
The 2008 Steelers: Pittsburgh was 11-3 and traveled to the 12-2 Titans on December 21, the next-to-last game of the season with home-field advantage on the line, and got smoked like a pack of Kool’s 31-14.
The 2007 Giants: Note how all we typically hear about this team is how dominant their defense is, particularly the defensive line, thanks to shutting down the NFL’s most prolific offense in the Super Bowl, holding the Patriots to 14 points? Well, they allowed 45, 35, 31, 41 and 38 points in games during the season, and they lost two of their last three.
Yeah but we have Matt :'(
Yeah but we have Matt :'(
I listened to some Houston talk radio last night and one guy was sort of complaining that the Pats were running up the score. On the last TD drive it was mostly running plays.
Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter
Ramp up the Braylon-Edwards-back-to-Jets story. Jets released RB Kahlil Bell to make room for a wide receiver, per league source.
ProFootballTalk @ProFootballTalk
Eagles' McCoy, Vick, Celek, Patterson all out Thursday
Adam Wexler ‏@awexler
Schaub's QB rating in 5 national TV games (NYJ, GB, Chi, Det, NE) is 70 (4TD, 6 INT). For reference Mark Sanchez for the season is 71.8
CLASSLESS!
Should have just handed it over at the start of the 3rd quarter.
I have bad news for you, the motivations of fans and coaches/GMs are only aligned to a point. No GM is going to risk his hide by dropping off an adequate QB that will give you winning seasons to maybe, hopefully get lucky with a longshot player.
The difference is a good 4-7 years of employment with a winning franchise, perhaps significantly longer or getting fired in 2 years after your shitty fourth round quarterback gets his ass whooped.
It's easy for us fans to say, "Championship or bust!" when our jobs aren't on the line.
The Pats shouldve let them score sooner
I listened to some Houston talk radio last night and one guy was sort of complaining that the Pats were running up the score. On the last TD drive it was mostly running plays.
Its ok to have two teams but one should be in a different conference.
This is why I snicker when people say if we don't win in the playoffs this year then Smith and Ryan should be gone.
Yea, it'll be disappointing but do we really want to tempt fate by knee-jerk replacing the two guys that have consistently won for this franchise for the first time ever?
People tend to forget our history rather quickly.
I agree with the underlying point that good organizations are generally far more patient than fans. They have to be as they understand the difficulties in getting to the big game not to mention that there is an amount of luck and the ball bouncing your way to achieve a Super Bowl win given the parity in the league.squicken said:The joke on GAF is that 1 SB > 3 NFCCG. And for a fan that is true. But for a good organization that is very much false.
The standards around here have really fallen.Its ok to have two teams...
There's no one to replace Matt with but Smitty should be fired.
Look what a coach like Harbaugh did with Alex. Smith is a dumb ass and he's soft.
Haha, I love how Mark Sanchez is now basically the benchmark for awful QB play. That is the silver lining in this season for me.Adam Wexler ‏@awexler
Schaub's QB rating in 5 national TV games (NYJ, GB, Chi, Det, NE) is 70 (4TD, 6 INT). For reference Mark Sanchez for the season is 71.8
Benched him and replaced him with a 2nd year guy halfway through the season?
No, the joke was theduce22 convincing himself the opposite was true for the Eagles.I absolutely agree. The joke on GAF is that 1 SB > 3 NFCCG.
I agree with the underlying point that good organizations are generally far more patient than fans. They have to be as they understand the difficulties in getting to the big game not to mention that there is an amount of luck and the ball bouncing your way to achieve a Super Bowl win given the parity in the league.
I do, however disagree with the assertion that any organization would prefer 3 NFCCG over a Super Bowl. The end goal of this game we watch is to hoist that Lombardi. Ask any Coach/Owner/GM in this league if they would prefer supposedly "sustained" success in reaching a conference championship game for 3 years in a row or hoisting that trophy once in that span? It's not even a contest - they'll pick the latter option every time and twice on Sunday. Of course most would cheat and say they'd like both but they can't all have their cake and eat it too.
Ask Mike T or Rex with the Jets which he would have preferred?
Or Andy Reid?
The standards around here have really fallen.
"Nobody's covering Chris Johnson!"
...? The alternatives weren't win consistently or win a Superbowl and then suck.I agree with the underlying point that good organizations are generally far more patient than fans. They have to be as they understand the difficulties in getting to the big game not to mention that there is an amount of luck and the ball bouncing your way to achieve a Super Bowl win given the parity in the league.
I do, however disagree with the assertion that any organization would prefer 3 NFCCG over a Super Bowl. The end goal of this game we watch is to hoist that Lombardi. Ask any Coach/Owner/GM in this league if they would prefer supposedly "sustained" success in reaching a conference championship game for 3 years in a row or hoisting that trophy once in that span? It's not even a contest - they'll pick the latter option every time and twice on Sunday. Of course most would cheat and say they'd like both but they can't all have their cake and eat it too.
Ask Mike T or Rex with the Jets which he would have preferred?
Or Andy Reid?
Game of the week:http://lammatlarge.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/jags-fans.jpg
2013 Free Agents.
QB Derek Anderson
QB Charlie Batch
QB Jason Campbell
QB Chase Daniel
QB Trent Edwards
QB Joe Flacco
QB Bruce Gradkowski
QB Rex Grossman
QB Tarvaris Jackson
QB Byron Leftwich
"Short -> He's the next Drew Brees" has really overtaken "Black -> He's the next Mike Vick" in the QB stereotypes game.interesting...
does anyone thing if Sean Payton moves on, he'll take Chase Daniel with him?...Maybe to Dallas...to *backup* Romo, until Payton Harbaughs Tony.
Talon said:The alternatives weren't win consistently or win a Superbowl and then suck.
I didn't say they were and I'm not speaking specifically about the Falcons (i.e. I'm not telling you to dump your QB).Talon said:continue the course with consistent success or change course haphazardly because your QB might be good but not great.
I dont know what makes you think Im a Jag fan but I told you the Texans suck
...? The alternatives weren't win consistently or win a Superbowl and then suck.
The alternates were: continue the course with consistent success or change course haphazardly because your QB might be good but not great.
I didn't say they were and I'm not speaking specifically about the Falcons (i.e. I'm not telling you to dump your QB).
I'm saying that from an general organizational standpoint - the end goal is to win a championship. Period. Sustained success is fine but you only need to look at the Eagles to see where sustained success becomes meaningless...
We're having two different conversations here.I didn't say they were and I'm not speaking specifically about the Falcons (i.e. I'm not telling you to dump your QB).
I'm saying that from an organizational standpoint - the end goal is to win a championship. Period. Sustained success is fine but you only need to look at the Eagles to see where sustained success is meaningless...
Yup. I think the Texans are going to be good for the next few years, be competitive..but can't win the big one.
I don't know if it's worth the risk tanking and drafting a bust QB, or selling the farm to get an ELITE QB.
I think good but not great has been accepted because we were just so fuking bad before.
I was so happy last year winning the division. This year I'm so down and we're 11-2!
Success requires more success, and at some point good isn't good enough I guess.