1. Kevin Kolb.... lol! Kolb is not good. The last game he started the team put up 3 points. Sorry, this isn't a big loss if a loss at all.
2. Both starting OT's on a horrible line. So lets say on a scale from 1-10, your original starting tackles were rated 5's. Your backups 4's. ok? this was going to be a huge difference? no.
3. Your pass blocking was better the first 3 weeks? lets take a look:
week 1: 3 sacks allowed, 43 yards rushing
week 2: 2 sacks allowed, 102 yards rushing (on 32 carries)
week 3: 3 sacks allowed, 99 yards rushing (on 34 carries)
week 4: 8 sacks allowed, 28 rush yards (on 15 carries)
and now, the 3 losses:
week 5: 9 sacks allowed, 45 rush yards
week 6: 5 sacks allowed, 182 rush yards
week 7: 7 sacks allowed, 126 rush yards
So yeah, looks like your pass blocking took a hit but your run blocking significantly improved somehow without the hall of famer todd heap and it looks like your rush offense was devestated once your fullback got injured.... even though your run numbers have increased for the better!
4. kerry rhodes!? lol! alright...
5. which one of your starting DE's was injured? dockett? he has missed 1 game. and he has 0 sacks this season in 6 games started
6. who is this? Toler? heheahaha. alright man, i'm as big of a homer as any but come on
1. That QB rating you're so obsessed with, why don't you look at it for Kolb those first four weeks? That's cute that you took the game where he was sacked 9 times thanks to the OL as your entire sample to try to suggest he hasn't been good this season. Troll harder.
2. Give me a freaking break. Levi wouldn't make much difference from Batiste? hahahaha you aren't even trying! Levi is especially more effective at run blocking which would have helped significantly with the run game early on. Yes, it would be a HUGE difference to have him in instead of Batiste.
3. I know it sounds funny saying Heap was effective at blocking, but he has been. He actually only played the first two games, my bad for saying three. When you have a guy that's blocking well out, you have to compensate with multiple bodies and that takes away from somewhere else. Our 'improved' run blocking is perceived for having more success the last two games. Minny couldn't see little LSH and he had a career game, it was hilarious. If we continue to have success with our 3rd and 4th string RB's, I'll be ecstatic. That means we are seeing growth from the rookie tackle or maybe our low string RB's are better than we thought. Sherman is a stud and it is a large blow to the running game but also blocking over all. You argument is extremely flawed just using numbers. There are dozens of plays I watch where you see it really hurts not having him in there. Not to mention his fill-in, Mau'a is the moron that has had those horrible penalties that killed scoring drives late, losing us games. We both know that stats are nice, but never tell the full story in sports.
4. Rhodes has been great in Arizona. Don't care what your perception of him was before then. Only problem is injuries but when he's healthy, he's effective.
5. Dockett, yes. He MISSED one game but he was extremely limited the next game or two and has had to step off the field for various plays he normally wouldn't since. Anytime he's out is a big deal. Here's another point where your stats fail you, miserably. You know why he hasn't run up sacks? Because he gets double teamed every play! Guess what that does for our LB's and Campbell? Stats are completely worthless for displaying team play. His being double teammed allows others to get to the QB.
6. Having Greg Toler out means putting William Gay on the field. Gay fucking sucks. Toler was looking good before his injury last season but since he doesn't have a large sample of play since then, you can take this one off if you want but a healthy Toler would be leagues better than Gay.