Who is injured now?
Patches. Got hit from behind into the boards, and taken to the back right away.Who is injured now?
I stopped watching
Patches. Got hit from behind into the boards, and taken to the back right away.
I hear booing in broken French
He turned, but it was a late hit. No call either.
What an asshole move wtf, guy should get suspended, that's assault.
He turned, but it was a late hit. No call either.
Legal hit. Not from the behind.
Nice goal.
Where's the sportsmanship to say, "hey the puck is long gone, I really don't need to deliver this dirty hit..."
DAVEY!
What vision from the General
Where's the sportsmanship to say, "hey the puck is long gone, I really don't need to deliver this dirty hit..."
It's Stoner, he's not exactly a cerebral player.Where's the sportsmanship to say, "hey the puck is long gone, I really don't need to deliver this dirty hit..."
He's looked much, much better since being away from Patches. He's shooting a lot more, and being forced to be more creative. He's also getting easier match ups, I don't mind him when he's not being depended on to be the driving force of offence for the team.I wouldn't take DD out, always said it, you're gonna get another Bourque or some such. DD has his ups and downs but at least he makes a positive difference. It's nice to see he's not on the first line, but he has his place in the team still.
Just started watching. Have the refs been this whistle happy?
It's Stoner, he's not exactly a cerebral player.
He's looked much, much better since being away from Patches. He's shooting a lot more, and being forced to be more creative. He's also getting easier match ups, I don't mind him when he's not being depended on to be the driving force of offence for the team.
Stoner deserved to be fought over that hit even though I think it was clean. That's what hockey is about.
I somewhat agree. Clean hits shouldn't need retaliation.
Yeah but it's about sending a message for your team. I would want the same thing to happen if the roles were reversed.