Fata1moose
Banned
Hunwick is out due to illness...
this is a good opportunity for someone to step up because Hunwick has been playing awful lately, but Babcock just loves him
Babcock is Sacco in disguise.
Hunwick is out due to illness...
this is a good opportunity for someone to step up because Hunwick has been playing awful lately, but Babcock just loves him
Fuck Shanaplans, fuck Lamoriello. Who else?
Mark Hunter and Kyle Dubas.
Yeah fuck 'em.
Bryan Murray, Dace Cameron and Euegene Melnyk.
Do you think the expansion is do-able at level 23? It says you should be at 32, and that seems sooooooo far away.
Hags will have 2G, 1A tonight. Though to be fair, one of the goals will be an empty netter.
Since we are taking about games a little bit. For some reason I had the urge to break out my OG Xbox and play through some old games. Been playing some THUG, Halo 1&2, Timesplitters 2 and Battlefront 2 but oddly enough the game that has been getting played the most is Tiger Woods 06 for some weird reason :lol
It is addicting as fuck for some reason
I always wanted to get Tiger Woods PGA Tour, but I just kept waiting for the next ones year after year until I lost interest. I remember it being a gorgeous game on PS3 and 360.
I spent so much time with Battlefront 2 playing with bots. I miss this game. I'm absolute garbage at EA Battlefront to the point where I'm just turned off by it at times.
Why exactly was that not icing?
I wonder why can't you challenge icings? if you can challenge offsides, icing seems like the same idea.
Not exactly the same idea.
Offsides seem to only be challenged when there's a goal as a result of a missed call. At least, as far as I've seen this is the case. A lot of zone penetration by the offensive players are borderline offside a lot of times anyway.
Whether or not you review icing, play stops either way. Players get a quick rest and faceoff position is the only thing that'll be determined from that. While that's important, it's not going to directly affect goal differentials (as in, no goal was scored on an icing), like offside reviews have been.
That's what I meant, when a goal happens immediately after an icing, like for the Ducks just now
How long was possession for the Ducks from puck drop to scoring the goal, and did they leave the Rangers' zone? Regardless of these, play was blown dead already for the icing.
How long was possession for the Ducks from puck drop to scoring the goal, and did they leave the Rangers' zone? Regardless of these, play was blown dead already for the icing.
No, no. The Ducks committed a clear icing that wasn't blown dead and ended up in the net maybe 5 seconds later.
Regardless, tied at 1 after 1, Rangers actually looking like they were finding their game a little bit toward the end of the period there. Hopefully that continues.
No like, the Ducks iced the puck into the Rangers zone, but the call was missed, and they scored immediately
edit: beaten D: I'm going to get dinner!
2 high sticks that resulted in blood, no calls. Fuck
Refs have been way lenient on that shit this season. Even if they make the highstick call, refs will refuse to give 4 minutes. I thought blood was another automatic 2 minutes.
Watched the goal on NHL.com. Looks like they waved it off because the puck was near both Ranger and Duck players.
Refs have been way lenient on that shit this season. Even if they make the highstick call, refs will refuse to give 4 minutes. I thought blood was another automatic 2 minutes.
Good night for a win for truth, justice and the Coyotes way.
Questions.How do the Rangers only have 7 shots?
Me too.I'll still be playing Falllout this time next year, I'm sure of it.
Its stupid. I need my winter weather.Christmas Eve is currently forecasted to be 72 degrees in NYC. That's over 22C in your crazy moon language up there.