Six of the eight defenseman on Team Canada have more points than Rick Nash. WHY IS HE ON THE TEAM?
HE'S A MASTODON DAMMIT
Six of the eight defenseman on Team Canada have more points than Rick Nash. WHY IS HE ON THE TEAM?
I don't think anyone's too surprised by Staal's absence. Hasn't had a great season and he's a center in a country with many amazing centers. Got bumped by wingers.No Staal?
He's played 15 more games than Nash, it would be bad if he didn't
I don't think anyone's too surprised by Staal's absence. Hasn't had a great season and he's a center in a country with many amazing centers. Got bumped by wingers.
I think he's also struggled with injuries?
Duthie isn't letting Yzerman off the hook. Yzerman looks really uncomfortable here.
Smith? Ugh.
7 Rangers made Olympic teams: Callahan, Stepan and McDonagh for USA, Nash for Canada (which I don't get), Lundqvist and Hagelin for Sweden, and Zuccarello for Norway.
Smith will never see the ice.
Unless one of the other two suck ass. In which case we are fuuuuucked.
Unless one of the other two suck ass. In which case we are fuuuuucked.
Unless one of the other two suck ass. In which case we are fuuuuucked.
You realize the third goalie is not the backup right? This isn't an 82 game season, this is a short tournament. Mike Smith, along with Rick Nash and one other guy, is likely to watch the entire tournament in a suit and tie.
Jesus... cry more. Your Olympic team is fucking stacked.
^ if semin isn't scoring, what else is he good for?
He can play the drums?^ if semin isn't scoring, what else is he good for?
So here's Russia:
Sergei Bobrovsky
Semyon Varlamov
Alexander Yeryomenko
Anton Belov
Alexei Emelin
Andrei Markov
Yevgeni Medvedev
Nikita Nikitin
Ilya Nikulin
Fedor Tyutin
Slava Voynov
Artem Anisimov
Pavel Datsyuk
Denis Kokarev
Ilya Kovalchuk
Nikolai Kulemin
Evgeni Malkin
Valeri Nichushkin
Alexander Ovechkin
Andrei Popov
Alexander Radulov
Vladimir Tarasenko
Alexei Tereschenko
Viktor Tikhonov
Solid team, surprised no Semin.
No shit. But you also need to be careful in case of injury or lack of performance. Not sure Smith could be that guy.
:lol Canadian first world problems. Our goalies are kinda shit though..Jesus... cry more. Your Olympic team is fucking stacked.
But why are you saying if one of the top 2 is bad Canada is fucked? Because Smith is the third goalie, not the backup.
Besides, if Price is bad for a couple of games and gets replaced and then Luongo shits the bed then guess what, tournaments already over.
I see a lot of people complaining about Nash's points, but he missed over a month with a concussion. His PPG is a bit concerning, but he's played well since coming back.Giroux and Nash are good examples of the simple fact that being hurt for a month is a LOT better than just sucking ass for a month during the selection process.
I wish they could put together a team of all the Canadian snubs, and have them actually beat the main roster.
I'm a little more surprised at the Carter pick, but ... eh, if you want a good natural goal scorer, he fits the bill.Only mind boggling decision for Canada is Nash. Plenty of deserving players were going to get left off either way.
Even if you factor for those missed games G is averaging more points per game, plus it seems odd to take the guy that has been more injured.
I'm glad about no Hedman (he's been bad for Team Sweden and isn't as good on big ice) and no Lehner makes sense but I'm disappointed Zibby didn't make it. Kruger is meh.
Roster and my speculation on lines beyond the confirmed center positions:
Sedin-Sedin-Steen
Zetterberg-Backstrom-Eriksson
Franzen-Berglund-Alfredsson
Landeskog-Kruger-Hagelin
Silfverberg, Jimmie Ericsson
Karlsson - Ekman-Larsson
Kronwall-Ericsson
Hjalmarsson-Oduya
Tallinder, Edler
Lundqvist
Enroth
Gustavsson
Canada could ice the two best groups of forwards. Goalies and defense is a different story.That... would actually never happen lol. There's half a really solid team left over, but let's not go crazy.
The whole "canada could field two teams that would challenge for gold" was always an exaggeration imo. Canada can field one great team and then have a pretty solid B team that could hypothetically, with a bit of luck, give Finland a scare in the quarter finals.
At least my loyalties won't be divided between my Captain and my country now.
Probably not, but when Switzerland can take Team Canada's A team to a shootout, it's really not that far-fetched.That... would actually never happen lol. There's half a really solid team left over, but let's not go crazy.
The whole "canada could field two teams that would challenge for gold" was always an exaggeration imo. Canada can field one great team and then have a pretty solid B team that could hypothetically, with a bit of luck, give Finland a scare in the quarter finals.
Probably not, but when Switzerland can take Team Canada's A team to a shootout, it's really not that far-fetched.
if they tried to make 2 even teams, Both would be favouritesThat... would actually never happen lol. There's half a really solid team left over, but let's not go crazy.
The whole "canada could field two teams that would challenge for gold" was always an exaggeration imo. Canada can field one great team and then have a pretty solid B team that could hypothetically, with a bit of luck, give Finland a scare in the quarter finals.
Nah, i would say that centers and D are their deepest positions.Canada could ice the two best groups of forwards. Goalies and defense is a different story.