brucewaynegretzky
Member
Listen, I'm a fan of a team that's quite a bit more valuable thanks yours will likely ever be.
But when the finances are completely skewed in the direction of overpaying players... And the NHLPA wants a fucking raise? Sorry. But Econ 101 is to get finances in order. If NHL were paying their players what MLB is... The league would be profitable. If structured like MLB, it would be just as fucking boring.
There's no need for a mediator. They are there. Fehr is trying to stall to make it look like he's doing "everything" he can while he chokes any positivity out of negotiation. It's an attempt to get in the middle but he's just going to fuck over core economics like EVERY SINGLE PROPOSAL HE HAS EVER DONE
What this process needs is psychiatrists, not mediators. Anyone who supports fehr or the NHLPA, especially for very non relevant things like "the coyotes don't make money!" Needs to get their heads checked.
Last I checked, there aren't 18 teams named the Phoenix coyotes and last I checked... Their revenue pit is helping the rest of the league.
So 18 teams even after the gift of a lower salary floor due to teams not reaching revenue mins means what? That they should move? Or maybe there is a more sensible Econ structure which doesn't revolve around players having their balls lathered with wet $100 bills?
I hate the coyotes and other poor earning teams than you ever will. But I still maintain common sense when dealing with core issues. There are causes to these things that I am fully aware of that you constantly feign ignorance to.
That's not an acceptable disagreement.
This is just ridiculous. I've explained numerous times how if you structure revenue sharing as a percentage of profits of the most profitable teams redistributed to the least profitable (minus the teams that clearly are incapable of being profitable) you can EASILY cover the teams which are not consistently profitable, but have the ability to be in the black if managed well.
The bolded is not an economic argument. It's another example of how you argue economics to further goals with have nothing to do with actual economics, but rather the broken monopolistic structure of how the league already works. An ACTUAL economically rational approach would be every team can pay what they want, but that's just what we had before when Toronto spent a billion dollars a year. The solution is an ACTUAL middle ground where you don't artificially depress wages to the point where an impossibly non-competitive business (aka PHX) is profitable.