Coldnoodle
Member
9pm? Shit is so weird and obscure with these negotiations and meetings.
Sleepover.
9pm? Shit is so weird and obscure with these negotiations and meetings.
Could it be anyone but Cake Boss?I can't wait to see which team hoper gets to be Piggy and has a huge rock dropped on their head.
I love how the Hope/Nope divide has gone on long enough that it's starting to take on tribalistic elements. The standard hostility and generalizations. Soon we'll be at each other with rocks and spears.
9pm now...this damn thing was originally set for 5pm wasn't it?
No room for compassion in this war party, dr. jones. Kill or be killed.Could it be anyone but Cake Boss?
Better hope team hope isn't smart enough to figure out bigger boards/nails.....oh who am I kidding, of course they aren't.I plan on using a board with a nail in it.
No room for compassion in this war party, dr. jones. Kill or be killed.
Better hope team hope isn't smart enough to figure out bigger boards/nails.....oh who am I kidding, of course they aren't.
When Harry Met Sally?lol, I knew you would get that reference.
Here come the leaks, revenue sharing seems to be done, they have issues on pensions.
If that's true then shouldn't this thing be pretty close to being done? Unless revenue isn't this HRR we all keep hearing about.
Taylor Hall said:RT @darrenturcotte8: It is pretty obvious. The shorter the season the more owners make. 1/2 salaries plus all benefits of playoff money for 48 game season
The Salary cap in 2013-2014(NHL wants a $60M cap, NHLPA wants $67M) and escrow are the biggest issues from my understanding.
The players want a cap on escrow(league revenues will drop due to the lockout and they don't want to be on the hook for it).
I suggest we exploit Team Hope's naivety and tendency to repeat the same mistake over and over again.
is it in yet
Revenue sharing and 10 year CBA with conditions agreed to by both sides
So... Pension, contracting, escrow appear to be the MAJOR issues left
Pension is easy
Don't see NHL budging on the other two (Especially escrow)
They'll get SOMETHING on contracting, though I expect the numbers to be tweaked on length and fluctuation. Escrow will be killer. I wouldn't be surprised to see Fehr cave there in exchange for contracting restriction changes.
Don't forget the 2013/14 cap, still a big issue
Contracting is very important because of insurance
I think the max the NHL can do is 7 years (they are at 6 years / 7 years for drafted team currently)
Insurance is important to players too as if someone goes on LTIR, they're paid with insurance and it frees up the cap space for another player (with up to equal value)
It's essentially adding money outside of the system
Why can't they go past 7 years? And when did they move to 6/7? Last I remember was 5/7 I thought.
At this point why not just go 7 across the board and drop the damn variance limits? If the contract is capped at 7 years the variance doesn't seem particularly important.
Because insurance companies don't want to insure contracts greater than 7 years
No insurance means when a player gets injured, team eats the cost... Depending on the team and contract value, they might not be able to afford other contracts in their place
I understand what you're saying, what I don't understand is where they got the 7 year figure from. It's obviously not arbitrary. Are they NOT getting insurance now? Did insurers just come to them and say "We won't insure contracts longer than 7 years anymore?"
This is without Galchenyuk and Muprhy funnily enough. Although London is missing Harrington.London Knights lost tonight to the Sarnia Sting. Bringing their 24 game winning streak to a close.
OK, so they're not covering everyone, and already eating some costs. The 7 year contract term requirement is rather arbitrary as a "non-negotiable" then. It's not like its the difference between total coverage and no coverage. I understand why they'd set that as their benchmark, but it hardly seems like a "necessary" term for them considering what they get by capping at 7 years.
From everyone's favorite insider.
Kypreos reports that both sides had internal meetings on adding four more teams to the playoffs but it hasn't been brought up in negotiations.
Hope for the Leafs??
From everyone's favorite insider.
Kypreos reports that both sides had internal meetings on adding four more teams to the playoffs but it hasn't been brought up in negotiations.
Hope for the Leafs??