Just to add a little more to the consistency discussion of the Keith ban, take a look at this elbow to the head on Hejda after he dropped to his knee. Torres had enough time to let up, wasn't committed to the hit before Hejda dropped but still went through with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wckGdkYJsCg
No ban for Torres. He was fined $2,500. It's funny to me that the league recognized the hit enough to fine Torres for it but not enough to do anything about it. Great message to send, especially to that shit head.
If Raffi Torres can get away with head hits don't be shocked to see star players get a little leniency. I think 6 or 7 would've been the sweet spot for the Keith ban in regards to how suspensions have been handled this year, but like a few others around here I think suspensions in general need to be longer.
The people talking about first round ban are unhinged. Yes it sucks that one of your top players is out of the lineup now but should player status be considered during bans? Of course not. Why should a guy get a longer ban because he took out a 1st liner rather than a 4th? Bigger contracts should not = bigger consideration for punishment. That's a good way to cause a fair amount of unrest within the NHLPA except for the '1%', so to speak. Make suspensions longer in general and that'll be an effective deterrent.