• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NHL Offseason mid Aug: World Cup, signings, HC Davos to whup ass, etc

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have so, so many Zubrus rookies cards...

Also, who did Montreal get for Linden? Did they trade him to Washington or Vancouver?
 

Malakhov

Banned
Mike Works said:
I have so, so many Zubrus rookies cards...

Also, who did Montreal get for Linden? Did they trade him to Washington or Vancouver?
To Caps: Trevor Linden, Dainius Zubrus and a second-round 2001 pick
To Montreal: Richard Zednik, Jan Bulis, first-round 2001 draft pick (Alexander Perezhogin)

We almost traded Linden to Vancouver for you know you? Big bert, but Houle was stupid enough to refuse.
 

Malakhov

Banned
Leafs re-sign McCabe, Antropov
Canadian Press
8/5/2004

TORONTO (CP) - Defenceman Bryan McCabe has landed a $10-million deal with the Toronto Maple Leafs, who also have re-signed centre Nik Antropov.

McCabe, who was paid $3.5 million US last season, will get $4.5 million next season and $5.5 million the following season in the two-year deal signed two days before a scheduled salary arbitration hearing.

Antropov got a one-year deal worth $1.325 million after making $925,000 last season.
Wow are the Leafs overpaying, how surprising ;)

Hatcher is worth 6 millions a season (under the old CBA), Gonchar just signed for 5.5 millions, Redden, Jovonoski and Chara won't even make 5.5 millions in 2005-06. I fail to see how McCabe should get 5 millions, sheesh.
 

Malakhov

Banned
Flames sign FA Jason Wiemer

Hurricanes sign Matt Cullen

Blues re-sign Cajanek

Fedotenko awarded 1.5 millions
 

Greekboy

Banned
Malakhov said:
Wow are the Leafs overpaying, how surprising ;)

Leafs are ridiculous. Nice retirement contracts handed out to Eddie, Roberts and Niuwendyk too.

"If you overprice your tickets, they will come".

Dumbest fans in the league by far.
 

Malakhov

Banned
The McCabe numbers were wrong:

YEAR 1: $4,450,000
YEAR 2: $4,500,000

Still, 9 millions for 2 years is way too much for him.
 

Malakhov

Banned
Avalanche winger Hejduk awarded $5.7M
Canadian Press
8/5/2004

TORONTO (CP) - Star winger Milan Hejduk of the Colorado Avalanche has been awarded a one-year, $5.7-million US contract in NHL salary arbitration.

The 28-year-old Czech native had 75 points (35-40) in 82 games with the Avalanche last season while earning $3.2 million. He scored 50 goals in 2002-03 and won the Rocket Richard Trophy as the league's top goal-scorer.

Hejduk, Quebec's sixth pick, 87th overall, in the 1994 NHL entry draft, has 416 points (197-219) in 470 career games. He also has 61 points (28-33) in 90 career playoff games.

The Avs already have a few other big salaries to pay next season, including Rob Blake ($8.35 million), Joe Sakic ($8.74 million) and Adam Foote ($4.4 million). Centre Peter Forsberg, who earned $11 million last season, remains unsigned.
The arbitror is handing out very nice decisions so far, wow.
 

Greekboy

Banned
Malakhov said:
How surprising from a leafs fan.

Many Leaf fans here in Toronto are always blinded by the blue and white and can rarely be objective. I am a Leaf fan too and that McCabe contract is a joke. Oh he's good offensively but very erratic in the defensive zone. The guy is always prone for a mistake in his own zone. See the last two years of playoffs as evidence of this.
 
Malakhov said:
The arbitror is handing out very nice decisions so far, wow.
Hejduk's always been an unrated player in my books (hard to be overated when you're playing with Forsberg and Sakic).

Though maybe I'm just saying that because he enjoys scoring 50 goals a game against the Canucks.
 

Malakhov

Banned
Mike Works said:
Hejduk's always been an unrated player in my books (hard to be overated when you're playing with Forsberg and Sakic).

Though maybe I'm just saying that because he enjoys scoring 50 goals a game against the Canucks.
Heh, maybe that has something to do with it ;)

Seriously, I do consider Hejduk one of the best pure scorer in the league these days. He's been a threat since he entered the league, the only year that he was off was the year that he was playing with an injury that finally took him out.
 

DopeyFish

Not bitter, just unsweetened
Lisa Lashes said:
Many Leaf fans here in Toronto are always blinded by the blue and white and can rarely be objective. I am a Leaf fan too and that McCabe contract is a joke. Oh he's good offensively but very erratic in the defensive zone. The guy is always prone for a mistake in his own zone. See the last two years of playoffs as evidence of this.

neg. I speak the truth. McCabe does make mistakes just like any other. Nowhere near as blatant as Kaberle or Berg. McCabe really sucked last year, this year he was just dyn-o-mite!
 

Greekboy

Banned
DopeyFish said:
neg. I speak the truth. McCabe does make mistakes just like any other. Nowhere near as blatant as Kaberle or Berg. McCabe really sucked last year, this year he was just dyn-o-mite!

Proves my point. Why dish out that contract to such an inconsistent player? Only the Leafs.
 

calder

Member
Now THIS is interesting. Scott Taylor wrote a nice (if slightly overstated, but hey that's Taylor) piece on Heatley in the Free Press today. I don't think you can get it online if you're not a subscriber, and I'll be damned if I transcribe the whole thing because it's pretty routine for the most part, but there was one pretty new bit of info.


As Heatley continues his workout regimen in Calgary, it's becoming more apparent to those close to him that the time has come for the 23-year-old superstar to get out of Atlanta. For his own mental health, Heatley simply can't remain in a city - and be successful - where a nightmarish event took place and where he's facing serious criminal charges as a result.

....

Yesterday, McAlpine [his agent] wouldn't comment on Heatley's NHL future, except to say that it was "a delicate time."

.....

For those fans who don't already know Dany Heatley, the World Cup will be his official coming-out party. This will be the event in which he takes the reins and becomes the Next Big Thing.

While he's at it, his agent will be grinding it out in the boardroom. There are not only the legal issues, but Heatley's future in the NHL. Will the future be in Atlanta or, perhaps, in a Canadian city?

None of this speculation about Heatley leaving Atlanta is totally new, but I think it's the first time a reporter has spoken to ppl around Heatley and then reported the possibility of him moving sooner rather than later out of Atlanta as baldly. The whole article is about how Dany is training every day already, in the best shape of his life, and so on. All the quotes are from his agent Stacey McAlpine (from Toronto, btw. start dreaming Leaf fans!) but Taylor mentions discussions with other ppl who know Heatley in Calgary or watch him closely, which is why I think the speculation about Heatley turning down the Thrashers qualifying contract maybe as a prelude to getting the hell out is a bit more compelling now.

There was also so goofy comparisons where Taylor mentions that Heatley scored more points last year in 31 games than "alleged NHL offensive stars" like Comrie, Primeau, Oates (?), Junueau (?!?) and Marcus Nilson and Ville Niemenen (!?!?!?!?!wtf!?!) but it wouldn't be a Scott Taylor column without the "holy shit is THAT example/analogy/logic mind-bending and reaching!" section. Taylor also goes on and on about how Heater was the best player in the world in May, but I think Iggy or Brad Richards might have an argument.
 

calder

Member
Oh yeah.

Senators re-sign Phillips, Schaeffer

TSN.ca Staff

8/6/2004

The Ottawa Senators re-signed defenceman Chris Phillips and forward Peter Schaeffer to multi-year deals on Friday, avoiding arbitration with the restricted free agents.

Phillips signed a three-year deal worth close to $8-million, while Scaefer's pact was for two seasons and $2.5-million.

Phillips, 26, recorded career-highs in goals (7) and points (23) and tied his career high in assists (16) through his 82 games in 2003-04. He was one of only two Senators (with Chris Neil) to play in all 82 regular season games.

In seven NHL seasons, Phillips has 31 goals, 88 assists and 286 penalty minutes in 467 career games. The Calgary native has also added four goals, seven assists and 42 penalty minutes in 58 career playoff games.
Steady and reliable and solid as he is, Phillips is still a disappointment to me. He's not *quite* in his absolute prime as a defenseman yet, but unless his offense picks up a fair bit it's just not worth a 1st overall pick for a good-but-not-great, good skating, physical defender with just 'decent' offense.
 

bishoptl

Banstick Emeritus
http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/news/story?id=1853599

The Coyotes have signed free agent right wing Brett Hull, the NHL's active scoring leader, the team announced Friday. Terms of the two-year contract were not announced.

The 18-year NHL veteran currently ranks third on the NHL's all-time goal scoring list with 741 goals. Only Hall of Famers Wayne Gretzky (894) and Gordie Howe (801) have scored more goals than Hull. Hull has also scored 103 playoff goals, which ranks fourth on the NHL's all-time list, trailing only Gretzky, Mark Messier and Jari Kurri.

"Brett Hull is one of the most talented goal scorers in NHL history," Coyotes general manager Michael Barnett said. "He is a dynamic player who creates excitement every time he enters the offensive zone. He has contributed significantly to winning Stanley Cups in both Detroit and Dallas. We not only look forward to the experience and passion he will bring to his teammates here in Phoenix but also to the pure entertainment he will provide to our fans."
The Gretzky train rolls on.
 

Mainline

Member
I just read that article on Heatly as well, interesting. What I want to know is who is going to take the risk and sign Allison, if I was a GM I'd draw up an contract with a bunch of incentives for games played, goals, points etc. I think, if he's healty, Allison can come back and go back to scoring 80+ points a season with the right team.
 

calder

Member
Mainline said:
I just read that article on Heatly as well, interesting. What I want to know is who is going to take the risk and sign Allison, if I was a GM I'd draw up an contract with a bunch of incentives for games played, goals, points etc. I think, if he's healty, Allison can come back and go back to scoring 80+ points a season with the right team.
OOH BUSTED. I knew you'd buckle and post some day!


And I dunno about Allison, he was always so slow, add his age and injury proneness and I'm not sure he can contribute much even if he's healthy. But then I never quite believed he really was that good offensively and then bam he goes and gets 95 pts one year. Even in his injured years he got more than a PPG.

Holy shit, he's not old he's fucking younger than me. I thought he was in his mid 30's... damn. :\ I'm ready for that Logan's Run thing now, I give up.
 
calder said:
Now THIS is interesting. Scott Taylor wrote a nice (if slightly overstated, but hey that's Taylor) piece on Heatley in the Free Press today. I don't think you can get it online if you're not a subscriber, and I'll be damned if I transcribe the whole thing because it's pretty routine for the most part, but there was one pretty new bit of info.

[article]
hahahaha, I thought you said Healy, as in Glen Healy. I was so, so confused reading that.

Here's a question though. Say you could choose only one combo for your team (lets say the Leafs, since they'll buy anything), what would it be;

Naslund + Bertuzzi

Kovulchuk + Heatley

What would you choose (and why)?
 

calder

Member
Mike Works said:
hahahaha, I thought you said Healy, as in Glen Healy. I was so, so confused reading that.

Here's a question though. Say you could choose only one combo for your team (lets say the Leafs, since they'll buy anything), what would it be;

Naslund + Bertuzzi

Kovulchuk + Heatley

What would you choose (and why)?

If I was the Leafs, Nazzy+Bert because their window is so damn short with the age of their roster.

If I was any other team, Heatley and Kovalchuk. Just because they're younger (and cheaper, for a while) - they haven't even reached their peak yet and I'd say right now they are barely a half-step behind Nazzy/Bert as far as talent and effectiveness go right now.

But Taylor's article started this crazzee "what if" thing in my head where Heatley goes to a Canadian team. Canucks would be in the running, simply because with their roster they could add a player like Heatley and start pretty much penciling themselves into the third round of the playoffs. He's still got a lot of close ties to Calgary and he's insanely popular there. The Leafs can sure afford him (and if he expressed any interest in the Leafs the media and fans would pretty much force him to go after Heatley like mad, and I'd agree with them). The Oilers are a long shot because they don't have the hometown ties or unlimited budget but you can't rule them out. The Habs could afford him I guess, but how much they'd want him I have no idea.
 

Malakhov

Banned
The Habs had tried to put their hands on Kovalchuk and had offered a really good deal for him but Atlanta refused at the last minute, maybe they'd make another package deal like that for Heatley, I don't know.
 
calder said:
But Taylor's article started this crazzee "what if" thing in my head where Heatley goes to a Canadian team. Canucks would be in the running, simply because with their roster they could add a player like Heatley and start pretty much penciling themselves into the third round of the playoffs.
Penciling ourselves into the third round?

Does Heatley happen to play goal?

FUCKING CLOUTIERKLD;JFSsdkfjhsldjhfasjd

(I actually like Cloutier, I'm just in a hockey-self depreciating mood at the moment)

As for the question I myself proposed, it's a tough choice..

Naslund - Proven pure scorer, has slightly improved his backcheck (thank you Morrison), but may be off to Sweden soon. Assumption that he'll stay in NHL should he get traded for at least 3 years.

Bertuzzi - One of the most powerful if not the most powerful player in the game, proven goal scorer, can single-handedly change a game.. for good or bad. Has a short temper, game might be changed emotionally after Moore incident.

Heatley - Promising prospect/leader, had a terrible incident, might go to jail, looked great in his reaction year (after the accident), good chance at being the next Thornton/Bertuzzi.

Kovulchuk - Pure scorer like Naslund, only younger. Only question is whether or not he can keep it up (a question which plagues all young snipers in their early years). Outlook good.

It's tough to call, but I'd go with Heatley/Kovulchuk for most teams, purely because of Naslund going off to Sweden in the near future, I think, plus Bertuzzi's future. I don't doubt his capabilities as a player, but this whole off ice stuff can really fuck with a guy. I dunno, it's a tough call. If it were the Canucks, I'd want to keep Bertuzzi/Naslund for sure, but for most other teams, I'd take the younger combo.
 

Malakhov

Banned
And you have to take into consideration that in all of these players, their NHL future aren't safe at all 'cept one player and that's Kovalchuk.

I myself would go with Heatley and Kovalchuk even though Bertuzzi is my favorite player.
 
Mike Works said:
Penciling ourselves into the third round?
FUCKING CLOUTIERKLD;JFSsdkfjhsldjhfasjd

I offered to suit up but the NHLPA wouldn't hear of Cloutier going without an income. ;-)

I find the Mccabe talk funny because he was overpriced when we dropped him for, what was it, a 2nd round pick? I think Quinn just likes picking up Canucks garbage.

Good points on the player choice. Bert's got a lot of years left when he comes back, but Naslund is getting closer to becoming Mogilny - expendable.

Man, we need a goaltender...
 

Mainline

Member
Ofcourse I am posting calder, I was just waiting for you to make a hockey related topic, we both know I am very opinionated about hockey. So who else has tickets for the World Cup? :)
 

calder

Member
The Bookerman said:
Cloutier was seriously the worst starting goalie in the NHL last year.

Technically, Roman Turek was a starter for a while. ;)


Heatley - Promising prospect/leader, had a terrible incident, might go to jail, looked great in his reaction year (after the accident), good chance at being the next Thornton/Bertuzzi.
My gut reaction was to say that Heatley is better than Thornton right now, but then that made me realize how expectation plays such a huge part of it. I seriously thought Thornton would be better than he is by now - sure he's an elite talent and if he's healthy he'll be in the top 5 in scoring while bringing excellent size to the mix, but for a while I figured he'd be a dominant scorer in the league (like, pencil him in for the Art Ross at the beginning of every year) and that hasn't quite happened yet.

It's risky but I still think Heatley is going to be noticeably better than Thornton this year, or at most the year after. Not that Thornton isn't great, although he had an off year, but in my mind at least by not continuing the big improvements he had the previous couple of years I've tempered my expectations.
 

calder

Member
Hah, that reminds me that I bet my brother $10 that Giguere would have a "bounce back" season. I don't even really think he will, but we couldn't agree on what stats it would take to qualify as bounce-back. I tried to say that if the Ducks make the playoffs and he's the starter it counts, but my brother kept insisting he had to match his regular season numbers from 2 years ago.

It was one of those bets that, after you make it, you realize you have no freaking idea how it'll end up. I would have tossed a coin because in my mind Giggy could either win the Vezina this year or he could end up the second most overpaid backup in league history.
 

DopeyFish

Not bitter, just unsweetened
Crazymoogle said:
I offered to suit up but the NHLPA wouldn't hear of Cloutier going without an income. ;-)

I find the Mccabe talk funny because he was overpriced when we dropped him for, what was it, a 2nd round pick? I think Quinn just likes picking up Canucks garbage.

Good points on the player choice. Bert's got a lot of years left when he comes back, but Naslund is getting closer to becoming Mogilny - expendable.

Man, we need a goaltender...

And yet McCabe .... is still better than any single Vancouver Canucks defenceman.
 

FightyF

Banned
The Coyotes are looking great IMO.

Hull is an odd pick...but he's very useful if you know how to use him (PPs). But the rest of the team is a bit quick...which is why I think it's odd.

Oilers sign Eric Brewer to one year deal

Yeah well I honestly think that Brewer had every right to go for arbitration. On the other hand, it just seems so negative and almost like a diss to the fans of this small market team. I'm sure Brewer doesn't want that, or any negative stigma associated with him.

I wonder what's up with Nedved...a lot of news, views...but nothing concrete.

Penciling ourselves into the third round?

Does Heatley happen to play goal?

FUCKING CLOUTIERKLD;JFSsdkfjhsldjhfasjd

I'm totally 180ing you here, but I think Cloutier played well. I also think that Hedberg was capable. I would place blame on the offense for not being able to break Calgary's defense. My theory is to use the speed of Rucinsky and Sanderson to get it deep inside, and use their skills around the robot Calgary D to create space and chances. Remember it was a close series...just a couple of more goals from Vancouver's offense would have won them the series IMHO. I could be wrong...but I've seen so many Flames games (more importantly many Flames losses) that I'm convinced that this is one way to beat them consistantly.

Anyways, this why I think Heately would be an essential for playoff success.
 
DopeyFish said:
And yet McCabe .... is still better than any single Vancouver Canucks defenceman.
hahaha.jpg


The only team I can think of that would value McCabe over Ohlund would be St Louis, considering they already have a big man. Ohlund is so much more valuable than McCabe, it's not even funny.

And then when you look at McCabe's numbers on the Leafs;

2003-04 Toronto NHL 75 16 37 53
2002-03 Toronto NHL 75 6 18 24
2001-02 Toronto NHL 82 17 26 43
2000-01 Toronto NHL 82 5 24 29

versus Jovo's on the Canucks;

2003-04 Vancouver NHL 56 7 16 23
2002-03 Vancouver NHL 67 6 40 46
2001-02 Vancouver NHL 82 17 31 48
2000-01 Vancouver NHL 79 12 35 47

I mean, you could maybe make a case for McCabe over Jovo, thanks to Eddy getting injured this season, but aside from that, you need to lay of the pipe buddy.

Fight for Freeform said:
The Coyotes are looking great IMO.
Yeah, but is their number 1 goalie still Boucher?

I'm totally 180ing you here, but I think Cloutier played well. I also think that Hedberg was capable. I would place blame on the offense for not being able to break Calgary's defense. My theory is to use the speed of Rucinsky and Sanderson to get it deep inside, and use their skills around the robot Calgary D to create space and chances. Remember it was a close series...just a couple of more goals from Vancouver's offense would have won them the series IMHO. I could be wrong...but I've seen so many Flames games (more importantly many Flames losses) that I'm convinced that this is one way to beat them consistantly.
1) All it would've taken was one goal. Game 7 went to overtime.

2) Sanderson was one of our best players in the stretch, and looked good in the playoffs too. Aside from a few key plays from Rucinsky, Sanderson was definitely the better signing, and I really wished he stayed with the team, because he fit in so, so well.

3) It wasn't Cloutier's fault at all, in fact I'd be hard pressed to fault anyone in particular (can't even fault Bertuzzi, because the re-formation of the team after he was gone worked out excellently). Both Calgary and Vancouver played very well- Calgary past their expectations obviously- Game 6 went to triple-OT (that was a classic), Game 7 went to OT... it was an awesome series, easily the best of the playoffs in my biased mind.
 

Greekboy

Banned
DopeyFish said:
And yet McCabe .... is still better than any single Vancouver Canucks defenceman.


You are a moron if you'd take McCabe over Ohlund or Jovo. And I am Leaf fan too. Homers like you simply disgust me. Take off the blue and white goggles for once in your fucking life.
 
Lisa Lashes said:
You are a moron if you'd take McCabe over Ohlund or Jovo. And I am Leaf fan too. Homers like you simply disgust me. Take off the blue and white goggles for once in your fucking life.
Hi, you must be new here, welcome to Gaming Age
 

Alucard

Banned
Paying McCabe that much money is a freaking joke. Nevermind that the Leafs have also now made ANTROPOV a millionaire. The NHL is almost getting as ridiculous as baseball at this rate. I still think that no player should be making more than 5 million a season...and when I say that I'm talking about the top tier guys like Iginla, Forsberg, etc.

The Leafs will likely be a flop (again) in the coming season. They make the same moves every year and never really take the time to let players develop. They go with "experience" over potential. One of these days they're going to run fresh out of draft picks and then they'll be as bad as they were in the early 90s.
 

Spike

Member
Lisa Lashes said:
You are a moron if you'd take McCabe over Ohlund or Jovo. And I am Leaf fan too. Homers like you simply disgust me. Take off the blue and white goggles for once in your fucking life.

IAWTP.

I've been a Leafs fan since the 70's. I've stuck with them through both the good and bad, but I won't be cheering them any longer. They've stuck with the same core team through the past 2-3 years, and they keep getting beaten. Yet, instead of acquiring new blood and trying to go the distance, they resign the same team. I have resigned myself to the fact that they will not win the cup.

I'm going to give the Leaf fanboys, like Dopey, a little secret. Steve Stavros, the former Leafs owner, is a relation to me. In fact, he comes to my restaurant every Sunday morning. According to him, the only prerequisite for the Leafs is to do well enough that they bring in the crowds to make the owners money. That is all. A championship would be well-received, but not necessary in the eyes of the owners. Fact. Now, John Ferguson Jr. might have different aspirations, but by the signings over the summer, it looks like the upper management has had its say in these matters, and all I see is a repeat of the past few years.

So, now I need to cheer on a new team. Do I cheer on my fave player, Joe Sakic and the Avalanche, or another team? Hmm, decisions, decisions.
 

Socreges

Banned
The Bookerman said:
Cloutier was seriously the worst starting goalie in the NHL last year.
How do you figure? There were at least a dozen starting goalies (41+ games) with worse numbers than him. He also plays on one of the most offensively-minded teams in the NHL and even had a strong playoff series before he got injured.
Mike Works said:
I mean, you could maybe make a case for McCabe over Jovo, thanks to Eddy getting injured this season, but aside from that, you need to lay of the pipe buddy.
Jovo actually plays terrific defense, despite being considered more of an offensive defenseman.
 

calder

Member
The NHL Network is showing Flames/Canucks '89 highlights. It's game 7, in OT if anyone wants to see how it ends. ;)

Haha, Neal just focused on how shitty Joel Otto is doing this series.


EDIT: wow whoever 26 was for the Canucks he was robbed point blank all alone in the slot! Bob Cole of course tried to make it sound like the greatest save in history (it was a nice toe save) but the guy had about 65% of the net wide open and just hit Vernon in the foot.

You can see how drastically the game has changed in like 15 years. The players seem slower (part of that is it being OT in game 7) but there's so much more freedom out there. You see all three attacking forwards on the boards near the hash marks fighting for the puck, defencemen swapping points, the centers are all over the damn place. Add the fact the goalies look *half* the size of goalies today and it's constant excitment.

OH SHIT SMYL HITS THE POST. This was a great, great hockey game. OMG Mullen all alone in front goes to the backhand as he's falling, McLean out of position, how the hell did that not go in. This game is as good as any in this years playoffs, even though it would have ended a half dozen times already if guys back then could raise the fricking puck 16 inches off the ice. ;)
 

Greekboy

Banned
Alucard said:
One of these days they're going to run fresh out of draft picks

That day is already here and good solid post from Spike. Nice to see that there are some realist Leaf fans out there but they are still outweighed heavily by the delusional ones. It's the delusional ones that keep the Leafs in business because they are too dumb or naive to look beyond the Maple Leaf crest and see the real or should I say bigger picture.
 

Alucard

Banned
Lisa Lashes said:
That day is already here and good solid post from Spike. Nice to see that there are some realist Leaf fans out there but they are still outweighed heavily by the delusional ones. It's the delusional ones that keep the Leafs in business because they are too dumb or naive to look beyond the Maple Leaf crest and see the real or should I say bigger picture.

YAAAAAAAAY FOR MONEY! As long as the stands are being filled, I doubt the management cares too much. I have a lot of friends who are Leafs fans and even they're getting a little frustrated. It's as if Toronto management is committed to never winning a Stanley Cup again. How do you pay a guy like Antropov a million? It makes no sense.

I do hope there will be hockey this season so I can make a trip or two to the ACC to watch the Pens and Leafs. :)
 

Greekboy

Banned
Alucard said:
YAAAAAAAAY FOR MONEY! As long as the stands are being filled, I doubt the management cares too much. I have a lot of friends who are Leafs fans and even they're getting a little frustrated. It's as if Toronto management is committed to never winning a Stanley Cup again. How do you pay a guy like Antropov a million? It makes no sense.

I do hope there will be hockey this season so I can make a trip or two to the ACC to watch the Pens and Leafs. :)

Well there is a theory going around saying that Leafs management is afraid to win the Cup because they love how the fans are currently coming in droves in anticipation of ending the 37 year drought. Tease them, tease them but never give in. I doubt it but an interesting theory nonetheless. I was so embarrassed as a Leaf fan when fans were driving around downtown and waving flags after beating the Flyers in a game during the playoffs last year.

Is that how sad we are now?
 
The only other thing I'll say about Mccabe is that he had his chance with the Canucks, and in the end management decided Jovo and Ohlund were worth more. Same goes with Aucoin - great guy with a shot that seems to get better with age - but 4+ million? Huh?
 

Malakhov

Banned
Brodeur's take on improving the NHL:

Improving the NHL isn't a tough chore
The real problem in hockey is a lack of quality scoring chances, NHL goalie MARTIN BRODEUR says


By MARTIN BRODEUR
Friday, August 6, 2004 - Page S1

New Jersey Devils goaltender Martin Brodeur is a member of the NHL's blue-ribbon panel on rules and a member of the team that will represent Canada at the World Cup of Hockey this month. His columns will continue during the World Cup.

I'm impressed by the steps the National Hockey League is taking to make sure everyone associated with the game gets a say in how to improve it.

Hearing from players, coaches and management, as well as those from the American Hockey League and junior levels, is the best way to ensure that the integrity of the sport is protected while the product is enhanced.

It's my feeling that despite the need for some changes to the NHL game, we're not that far away from having a sport that suits everyone's interests.

While much has been made of the decrease in scoring during recent seasons, the real problem in hockey is the lack of good scoring chances. On an average night playing goal for the New Jersey Devils, I face roughly 10 to 12 quality scoring chances over 60 minutes. If the NHL can find a way to ensure most teams are getting 15 to 20 good opportunities a night, it will have come a long way in addressing its problem.

Making that happen doesn't require an overhaul of the game, only some minor adjustments.

In the past 20 years, players have become bigger, stronger and better, which has resulted in less room for skating and making plays. With less open ice in which to manoeuvre, players have to fight much harder than they once did just to get a decent chance on goal.

Consider that a 30-team NHL means few teams can put superstars alongside superstars and it only figures that defensive hockey has gained an advantage.

Creating more chances, I believe, comes down to creating more skating and flow. The more room players have to skate, the more they will be able to stay in the play and use their skills to create chances.

Since increasing the size of the ice is impractical in most arenas, the NHL should start by looking at ways to create more space in the zones, through moving the bluelines or widening them.

Pushing the net closer to the end boards is another idea worth undertaking.

If we become more of a skating league, the talent is already there to give fans the excitement they crave.

While there is nothing wrong with a good hit in hockey, there are several things we could do to allow offensive players more freedom on the ice. Put an end to players being hit and pinned behind the play after they have dished off a pass. Permitting such late hits only takes good players out of the play and reduces the flow.

Another way to improve flow is to strictly enforce interference on players skating without the puck. Allowing players to move freely into the offensive zone for passes will lead to more skating and more scoring chances.

Keeping the star players fresh and ready to compete at the highest level also can improve the product. While the hurry-up faceoff rule may be great for fans watching in arenas, it takes a toll on top-line players, who are trying to catch their breath between whistles. The result is that many top players are forced to spend more time on the bench or play tired.

That isn't what fans want.

Another way to ease the players' fatigue would be to change the NHL schedule.

I'd love to see an end to interconference games. Aside from the obvious benefits of reducing travel for players and cutting costs for teams, our fans would get to see more of the New York Rangers, Boston Bruins, Toronto Maple Leafs and other teams with whom we have developed good rivalries.Shortening training camps and starting the regular season in September is another way to reduce the grind of the schedule. That would allow more off days while eliminating the need for back-to-back games.

Even though much of the debate about what ails hockey has focused on goaltenders, I believe this is missing the point. Before the league thinks about reducing equipment size or preventing goalies from playing the puck along the boards, it needs to listen to what the men who stand in front of pucks for a living have to say. For most of us, it's all about safety. Players are shooting harder today, and the commonly used butterfly style means knees can be exposed if goalies aren't able to use the pads of their choice.

The minor adjustments needed in today's NHL could all be easily implemented without upsetting the sport. There is no need to change the dynamics of hockey or the skills needed to succeed in this great game. I believe the solutions are all close at hand.

The Globe and Mail will make a donation to the Montreal Children's Hospital on behalf of Martin Brodeur.

Pretty good, though I'd like to hear about this from a player's view, maybe from a forward and a defensement just to see a different perspective.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom