Mike Works
Member
I have so, so many Zubrus rookies cards...
Also, who did Montreal get for Linden? Did they trade him to Washington or Vancouver?
Also, who did Montreal get for Linden? Did they trade him to Washington or Vancouver?
To Caps: Trevor Linden, Dainius Zubrus and a second-round 2001 pickMike Works said:I have so, so many Zubrus rookies cards...
Also, who did Montreal get for Linden? Did they trade him to Washington or Vancouver?
Wow are the Leafs overpaying, how surprisingLeafs re-sign McCabe, Antropov
Canadian Press
8/5/2004
TORONTO (CP) - Defenceman Bryan McCabe has landed a $10-million deal with the Toronto Maple Leafs, who also have re-signed centre Nik Antropov.
McCabe, who was paid $3.5 million US last season, will get $4.5 million next season and $5.5 million the following season in the two-year deal signed two days before a scheduled salary arbitration hearing.
Antropov got a one-year deal worth $1.325 million after making $925,000 last season.
Malakhov said:Wow are the Leafs overpaying, how surprising![]()
How surprising from a leafs fan.DopeyFish said:McCabe is definately worth that price you damn cack-addicts
The arbitror is handing out very nice decisions so far, wow.Avalanche winger Hejduk awarded $5.7M
Canadian Press
8/5/2004
TORONTO (CP) - Star winger Milan Hejduk of the Colorado Avalanche has been awarded a one-year, $5.7-million US contract in NHL salary arbitration.
The 28-year-old Czech native had 75 points (35-40) in 82 games with the Avalanche last season while earning $3.2 million. He scored 50 goals in 2002-03 and won the Rocket Richard Trophy as the league's top goal-scorer.
Hejduk, Quebec's sixth pick, 87th overall, in the 1994 NHL entry draft, has 416 points (197-219) in 470 career games. He also has 61 points (28-33) in 90 career playoff games.
The Avs already have a few other big salaries to pay next season, including Rob Blake ($8.35 million), Joe Sakic ($8.74 million) and Adam Foote ($4.4 million). Centre Peter Forsberg, who earned $11 million last season, remains unsigned.
Malakhov said:How surprising from a leafs fan.
Hejduk's always been an unrated player in my books (hard to be overated when you're playing with Forsberg and Sakic).Malakhov said:The arbitror is handing out very nice decisions so far, wow.
Heh, maybe that has something to do with itMike Works said:Hejduk's always been an unrated player in my books (hard to be overated when you're playing with Forsberg and Sakic).
Though maybe I'm just saying that because he enjoys scoring 50 goals a game against the Canucks.
Lisa Lashes said:Many Leaf fans here in Toronto are always blinded by the blue and white and can rarely be objective. I am a Leaf fan too and that McCabe contract is a joke. Oh he's good offensively but very erratic in the defensive zone. The guy is always prone for a mistake in his own zone. See the last two years of playoffs as evidence of this.
DopeyFish said:neg. I speak the truth. McCabe does make mistakes just like any other. Nowhere near as blatant as Kaberle or Berg. McCabe really sucked last year, this year he was just dyn-o-mite!
As Heatley continues his workout regimen in Calgary, it's becoming more apparent to those close to him that the time has come for the 23-year-old superstar to get out of Atlanta. For his own mental health, Heatley simply can't remain in a city - and be successful - where a nightmarish event took place and where he's facing serious criminal charges as a result.
....
Yesterday, McAlpine [his agent] wouldn't comment on Heatley's NHL future, except to say that it was "a delicate time."
.....
For those fans who don't already know Dany Heatley, the World Cup will be his official coming-out party. This will be the event in which he takes the reins and becomes the Next Big Thing.
While he's at it, his agent will be grinding it out in the boardroom. There are not only the legal issues, but Heatley's future in the NHL. Will the future be in Atlanta or, perhaps, in a Canadian city?
Steady and reliable and solid as he is, Phillips is still a disappointment to me. He's not *quite* in his absolute prime as a defenseman yet, but unless his offense picks up a fair bit it's just not worth a 1st overall pick for a good-but-not-great, good skating, physical defender with just 'decent' offense.Senators re-sign Phillips, Schaeffer
TSN.ca Staff
8/6/2004
The Ottawa Senators re-signed defenceman Chris Phillips and forward Peter Schaeffer to multi-year deals on Friday, avoiding arbitration with the restricted free agents.
Phillips signed a three-year deal worth close to $8-million, while Scaefer's pact was for two seasons and $2.5-million.
Phillips, 26, recorded career-highs in goals (7) and points (23) and tied his career high in assists (16) through his 82 games in 2003-04. He was one of only two Senators (with Chris Neil) to play in all 82 regular season games.
In seven NHL seasons, Phillips has 31 goals, 88 assists and 286 penalty minutes in 467 career games. The Calgary native has also added four goals, seven assists and 42 penalty minutes in 58 career playoff games.
The Gretzky train rolls on.The Coyotes have signed free agent right wing Brett Hull, the NHL's active scoring leader, the team announced Friday. Terms of the two-year contract were not announced.
The 18-year NHL veteran currently ranks third on the NHL's all-time goal scoring list with 741 goals. Only Hall of Famers Wayne Gretzky (894) and Gordie Howe (801) have scored more goals than Hull. Hull has also scored 103 playoff goals, which ranks fourth on the NHL's all-time list, trailing only Gretzky, Mark Messier and Jari Kurri.
"Brett Hull is one of the most talented goal scorers in NHL history," Coyotes general manager Michael Barnett said. "He is a dynamic player who creates excitement every time he enters the offensive zone. He has contributed significantly to winning Stanley Cups in both Detroit and Dallas. We not only look forward to the experience and passion he will bring to his teammates here in Phoenix but also to the pure entertainment he will provide to our fans."
OOH BUSTED. I knew you'd buckle and post some day!Mainline said:I just read that article on Heatly as well, interesting. What I want to know is who is going to take the risk and sign Allison, if I was a GM I'd draw up an contract with a bunch of incentives for games played, goals, points etc. I think, if he's healty, Allison can come back and go back to scoring 80+ points a season with the right team.
calder said:Now THIS is interesting. Scott Taylor wrote a nice (if slightly overstated, but hey that's Taylor) piece on Heatley in the Free Press today. I don't think you can get it online if you're not a subscriber, and I'll be damned if I transcribe the whole thing because it's pretty routine for the most part, but there was one pretty new bit of info.
Article:
Article: hahahaha, I thought you said Healy, as in Glen Healy. I was so, so confused reading that.
Here's a question though. Say you could choose only one combo for your team (lets say the Leafs, since they'll buy anything), what would it be;
Naslund + Bertuzzi
Kovulchuk + Heatley
What would you choose (and why)?
Mike Works said:hahahaha, I thought you said Healy, as in Glen Healy. I was so, so confused reading that.
Here's a question though. Say you could choose only one combo for your team (lets say the Leafs, since they'll buy anything), what would it be;
Naslund + Bertuzzi
Kovulchuk + Heatley
What would you choose (and why)?
Penciling ourselves into the third round?calder said:But Taylor's article started this crazzee "what if" thing in my head where Heatley goes to a Canadian team. Canucks would be in the running, simply because with their roster they could add a player like Heatley and start pretty much penciling themselves into the third round of the playoffs.
Mike Works said:Penciling ourselves into the third round?
FUCKING CLOUTIERKLD;JFSsdkfjhsldjhfasjd
The Bookerman said:Cloutier was seriously the worst starting goalie in the NHL last year.
My gut reaction was to say that Heatley is better than Thornton right now, but then that made me realize how expectation plays such a huge part of it. I seriously thought Thornton would be better than he is by now - sure he's an elite talent and if he's healthy he'll be in the top 5 in scoring while bringing excellent size to the mix, but for a while I figured he'd be a dominant scorer in the league (like, pencil him in for the Art Ross at the beginning of every year) and that hasn't quite happened yet.Heatley - Promising prospect/leader, had a terrible incident, might go to jail, looked great in his reaction year (after the accident), good chance at being the next Thornton/Bertuzzi.
Cloutier was worse than Giguere, Weekes, Osgood, Dunham, and Kolzig how?The Bookerman said:Cloutier was seriously the worst starting goalie in the NHL last year.
Crazymoogle said:I offered to suit up but the NHLPA wouldn't hear of Cloutier going without an income. ;-)
I find the Mccabe talk funny because he was overpriced when we dropped him for, what was it, a 2nd round pick? I think Quinn just likes picking up Canucks garbage.
Good points on the player choice. Bert's got a lot of years left when he comes back, but Naslund is getting closer to becoming Mogilny - expendable.
Man, we need a goaltender...
Oilers sign Eric Brewer to one year deal
Penciling ourselves into the third round?
Does Heatley happen to play goal?
FUCKING CLOUTIERKLD;JFSsdkfjhsldjhfasjd
DopeyFish said:And yet McCabe .... is still better than any single Vancouver Canucks defenceman.
Yeah, but is their number 1 goalie still Boucher?Fight for Freeform said:The Coyotes are looking great IMO.
1) All it would've taken was one goal. Game 7 went to overtime.I'm totally 180ing you here, but I think Cloutier played well. I also think that Hedberg was capable. I would place blame on the offense for not being able to break Calgary's defense. My theory is to use the speed of Rucinsky and Sanderson to get it deep inside, and use their skills around the robot Calgary D to create space and chances. Remember it was a close series...just a couple of more goals from Vancouver's offense would have won them the series IMHO. I could be wrong...but I've seen so many Flames games (more importantly many Flames losses) that I'm convinced that this is one way to beat them consistantly.
DopeyFish said:And yet McCabe .... is still better than any single Vancouver Canucks defenceman.
Hi, you must be new here, welcome to Gaming AgeLisa Lashes said:You are a moron if you'd take McCabe over Ohlund or Jovo. And I am Leaf fan too. Homers like you simply disgust me. Take off the blue and white goggles for once in your fucking life.
Man, you keep getting worst as time goes on.DopeyFish said:And yet McCabe .... is still better than any single Vancouver Canucks defenceman.
Lisa Lashes said:You are a moron if you'd take McCabe over Ohlund or Jovo. And I am Leaf fan too. Homers like you simply disgust me. Take off the blue and white goggles for once in your fucking life.
How do you figure? There were at least a dozen starting goalies (41+ games) with worse numbers than him. He also plays on one of the most offensively-minded teams in the NHL and even had a strong playoff series before he got injured.The Bookerman said:Cloutier was seriously the worst starting goalie in the NHL last year.
Jovo actually plays terrific defense, despite being considered more of an offensive defenseman.Mike Works said:I mean, you could maybe make a case for McCabe over Jovo, thanks to Eddy getting injured this season, but aside from that, you need to lay of the pipe buddy.
Alucard said:One of these days they're going to run fresh out of draft picks
Lisa Lashes said:That day is already here and good solid post from Spike. Nice to see that there are some realist Leaf fans out there but they are still outweighed heavily by the delusional ones. It's the delusional ones that keep the Leafs in business because they are too dumb or naive to look beyond the Maple Leaf crest and see the real or should I say bigger picture.
Alucard said:YAAAAAAAAY FOR MONEY! As long as the stands are being filled, I doubt the management cares too much. I have a lot of friends who are Leafs fans and even they're getting a little frustrated. It's as if Toronto management is committed to never winning a Stanley Cup again. How do you pay a guy like Antropov a million? It makes no sense.
I do hope there will be hockey this season so I can make a trip or two to the ACC to watch the Pens and Leafs.![]()
Improving the NHL isn't a tough chore
The real problem in hockey is a lack of quality scoring chances, NHL goalie MARTIN BRODEUR says
By MARTIN BRODEUR
Friday, August 6, 2004 - Page S1
New Jersey Devils goaltender Martin Brodeur is a member of the NHL's blue-ribbon panel on rules and a member of the team that will represent Canada at the World Cup of Hockey this month. His columns will continue during the World Cup.
I'm impressed by the steps the National Hockey League is taking to make sure everyone associated with the game gets a say in how to improve it.
Hearing from players, coaches and management, as well as those from the American Hockey League and junior levels, is the best way to ensure that the integrity of the sport is protected while the product is enhanced.
It's my feeling that despite the need for some changes to the NHL game, we're not that far away from having a sport that suits everyone's interests.
While much has been made of the decrease in scoring during recent seasons, the real problem in hockey is the lack of good scoring chances. On an average night playing goal for the New Jersey Devils, I face roughly 10 to 12 quality scoring chances over 60 minutes. If the NHL can find a way to ensure most teams are getting 15 to 20 good opportunities a night, it will have come a long way in addressing its problem.
Making that happen doesn't require an overhaul of the game, only some minor adjustments.
In the past 20 years, players have become bigger, stronger and better, which has resulted in less room for skating and making plays. With less open ice in which to manoeuvre, players have to fight much harder than they once did just to get a decent chance on goal.
Consider that a 30-team NHL means few teams can put superstars alongside superstars and it only figures that defensive hockey has gained an advantage.
Creating more chances, I believe, comes down to creating more skating and flow. The more room players have to skate, the more they will be able to stay in the play and use their skills to create chances.
Since increasing the size of the ice is impractical in most arenas, the NHL should start by looking at ways to create more space in the zones, through moving the bluelines or widening them.
Pushing the net closer to the end boards is another idea worth undertaking.
If we become more of a skating league, the talent is already there to give fans the excitement they crave.
While there is nothing wrong with a good hit in hockey, there are several things we could do to allow offensive players more freedom on the ice. Put an end to players being hit and pinned behind the play after they have dished off a pass. Permitting such late hits only takes good players out of the play and reduces the flow.
Another way to improve flow is to strictly enforce interference on players skating without the puck. Allowing players to move freely into the offensive zone for passes will lead to more skating and more scoring chances.
Keeping the star players fresh and ready to compete at the highest level also can improve the product. While the hurry-up faceoff rule may be great for fans watching in arenas, it takes a toll on top-line players, who are trying to catch their breath between whistles. The result is that many top players are forced to spend more time on the bench or play tired.
That isn't what fans want.
Another way to ease the players' fatigue would be to change the NHL schedule.
I'd love to see an end to interconference games. Aside from the obvious benefits of reducing travel for players and cutting costs for teams, our fans would get to see more of the New York Rangers, Boston Bruins, Toronto Maple Leafs and other teams with whom we have developed good rivalries.Shortening training camps and starting the regular season in September is another way to reduce the grind of the schedule. That would allow more off days while eliminating the need for back-to-back games.
Even though much of the debate about what ails hockey has focused on goaltenders, I believe this is missing the point. Before the league thinks about reducing equipment size or preventing goalies from playing the puck along the boards, it needs to listen to what the men who stand in front of pucks for a living have to say. For most of us, it's all about safety. Players are shooting harder today, and the commonly used butterfly style means knees can be exposed if goalies aren't able to use the pads of their choice.
The minor adjustments needed in today's NHL could all be easily implemented without upsetting the sport. There is no need to change the dynamics of hockey or the skills needed to succeed in this great game. I believe the solutions are all close at hand.
The Globe and Mail will make a donation to the Montreal Children's Hospital on behalf of Martin Brodeur.