:lolbeerbelly said:Yay. Hockey is back
If the start of the season is announced tomorrow, I'll watch the season with one of the biggest interest I've had in the past few years 'cept the habs playoff runs.
20 games season? Hell fking yeah, EVERY games count. 82 games sucks so much and I'm the first who wants the season to be shortnened.
Pfft, he ends up chickening out, Bertuzzi will just have to make him retire. He got Macinnis. He got Jackman.
Goodenow to Bettman:
Dear Gary,
Yesterday afternoon, Bill Daly presented us with an offer from the League that, for the first time, was not linked to League-wide revenues. We appreciated your willingness to adjust your position and we worked to respond in kind. By evening, we had fashioned and reached out to you with an offer from the PA that included, for the first time, a team maximum cap. This offer built upon the 24% rollback and other changes in favour of clubs, which were presented by the Players on December 9, 2004.
As you know, and as Ted told Bill, our offer of a team cap represented a radical step for the PA. We took this step because we too believe that our sport will be damaged greatly by the cancellation of this season and the continuation of the lockout through next season.
We wish that the NHL had offered a no linkage proposal before yesterday so that negotiations in that arena could have commenced sooner. However, we recognize that they did not and we agree that time is short.
In that spirit, and in a final attempt to reach an agreement, we are adjusting our offer of yesterday in two respects. First, we are reducing the maximum individual team cap to $49 million in salary, which does not include the $2.2 million per team in benefits due.
Second, we will adjust our exception provision so that it is available to teams only twice during the six year term and for up to only 10% over the limit of $49 million (to $53.9 million), at the tax rate of 150%. The exception provision is important so that a successful team does not have to arbitrarily dismantle its roster after it has achieved particular success or is in a unique phase of its player roster cycle.
I have attached a short summary of the main deal points discussed by Bill and Ted yesterday, as modified above.
I can be reached at the usual phone numbers.
Regards,
Robert W. Goodenow
Executive Director & General Counsel
NEW CBA DEAL POINTS
1. Term - 6 full seasons (through 9-15-11).
2. CBA System Incorporation of NHLPA December 9, 2004 proposal into the recently expired CBA, with indexing of financial provisions (per diems, etc.) at 2% per year, with the following additional changes requested by the NHL yesterday:
(a) Increased salary arbitration rights for Clubs -- to be agreed upon. Salary arbitration available after Player leaves Entry Level System.
(b) Cap on Exhibit 5 Individual B Performance Bonuses -- to be agreed upon.
© Replace NHLPA Revenue Sharing Plan with NHL Revenue Sharing Plan to share at least $88M in each year of the Agreement. Clubs may credit any payroll taxes paid against their revenue sharing contribution.
3. Team Payroll Limit - $49M in salary and bonuses
4. Minimum Team Payroll - $25M (each team can fall no more than 10% below only twice during term).
5. Minimum Player Salary - $300K (as per NHL Proposal)
6. Payroll Taxes - $40M - $43M (25%)
$43M - $46M (50%)
$46M - $49M (75%)
$49M - $53.9M (150%) only twice per team during 6 year term
7. Indexing of Tax Rates and Payroll Minimums & Maximums All dollar amounts would be in place for 2004-05 (pro-rated) and 2005-06. Dollar levels for tax rates, payroll minimums & maximums for subsequent years either constant or increased by % change in greater of either hockey related revenues or only the gate receipts and broadcasting segments of hockey related revenues from the 2005-06 base year.
8. 2005 Playoffs 55% of playoff revenues to be paid to Players for the 2005 playoffs.
It was 52.SystemShark said:PA's original offer was 46 million. To go up to 49 is a slap in the face to the NHL. I don't see anything getting worked out now.
BigJonsson said:lol
so if they could just set it at 45-46 we could have hockey?!
A few million really doesn't justify cancelling the season
1) Moore isn't a St Louis Blues defensemanSystemShark said:You forgot Moore. Am I right?!
Mrbob said:Do hockey fans really want a 28 game season followed by the playoffs?
It just seems so limiting.
Can you really crown a team a true champ after playing only 28 regular season games?
calder said:The best, and for me pretty much only, reason to want a season now is that if they don't settle now we'll have a shortened season next year too.
My dream scenario is they cancel this season but agree to work out the CBA over the next few weeks and then spend the whole summer coming up with rule changes.
Why not? Football only has 16 regular season games. I think it will actally be better... now every games means something. They should shorten the regular season to 50 games or something.Mrbob said:Do hockey fans really want a 28 game season followed by the playoffs?
It just seems so limiting.
Can you really crown a team a true champ after playing only 28 regular season games?
dem said:Funny thing how Gary decided to take that retarded 24% rollback that the pa offered.. and have it in the rest of the proposals.
Genius.
Goodenow got smacked around with that :lol
theo said:wonder if the league will cut ticket prices. i would recommend they do so if they want any semblance of a crowd at their games.
tralfazz said:I have attached a short summary of the main deal points discussed by Bill and Ted yesterday, as modified above.
This explains alot.
Anyone else hoping, secretly, that they don't get a deal done?
Wah-wah, my team can't pay me more than 3 million a season, I'm quitting. FUCK YOU, PLAYERS.
Dear Gary,
This is in reply to your most recent letter.
1. Your claim that the Clubs ''cannot afford'' our proposal is based on your hypothetical fear of what would happen if every team spent to the $49 million level the Players have proposed. The notion that ''every Club'' will spend at the $49 million level is contradicted by years of actual payroll experience under the old CBA system and by Exhibit 12 of your December 14 document (attached for your recollection), in which you projected 24 teams well below the $49 million level after the rollback. Further, this experience is based on an environment without revenue sharing, taxes on team payrolls and the numerous new system restrictions.
2. Based on your own calculations from Exhibit 12, over 21 Clubs are spending significantly less than your team payroll limit number of $42.5 million. I am at a loss to understand how you suggest your offer earlier today represents a $75 million dollar increase when it only impacts the spending of nine teams!
You will receive nothing further from us.
Regards,
NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE
PLAYERS ASSOCIATION
Robert W. Goodenow
Executive Director & General Counsel
Porthos said:Why not? Football only has 16 regular season games. I think it will actally be better... now every games means something. They should shorten the regular season to 50 games or something.
calder said:Ok, here goes, my dream outcome:
::calder's dream sequence::
EDIT: oh, my wife and I were at the mall yesterday and she rememebered I had been looking for a new cap so we stopped by a sports memorabilia kiosk and she bought me this for Valentine's day.
Thank god they had an XL to fit my giant melon.
Startling!Dear calder,
This is in reply to your most recent letter.
1. STFU
2. STFU!!!!!!!!!!
You will receive nothing further from us.
Regards,
NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE
PLAYERS ASSOCIATION
Robert W. Goodenow
Executive Director & General Counsel
calder said:Nope, not a RiverCity Sports (that's just where I got the image). It was that sports store in the walkway between The Bay and Portage Place. The guy has a ton of great Jets shirts and a fairly good selection of hats and stuff.
The guy who runs it is a bit chatty (probably lonely working by himself ) and he was saying how the sale of Jets stuff has just exploded the last few years. People were bitter and burnt out for a while, but in his little kiosk he said he sold like 10-20 Jets' tshirts and caps on Valentines day and was selling more every day the few weeks leading up to christmas.
Mikey 2x4 said:Then again, the NFL has 14. Hm...
Gregory said::lol WHAT?
The NFL only plays 14 games per season? Seriously? I lost all of the, admittedly low, respect I had for this sport and it`s players right here and now. I thought they played 80+ games like the others. 14? How the hell?
Sportsnet has learned the league will come off their hard stance of $42.5 million but will not accept the union's latest offer of $49 million.
Pronger pushing for a cap deal? Har har, that's some funny shit there if true.While the possibility of a deal was far from certain, the NHLPA's decision to accept a salary cap left a number of players red-faced and wondering why the union would decide to bend over backward at the 11th hour.
"I think we gave up too much," Senators goaltender Dominik Hasek told The Score yesterday.
And Hasek wasn't the only one feeling that way. Sources say the NHLPA's private website -- The Source -- was flooded with messages from union members who were frustrated by the union's offer to accept a $52-million cap.
"I am thoroughly embarrassed with the union," said one veteran player. "We've been preaching for five months that we're not going to accept a cap and then we have the rug pulled out from under us at the end.
"How the hell do you think I feel? What did we go through all this for? We come out and propose a hard cap at the end. That was something we said we would never accept. I just can't believe it."
Sources also say many players are upset with an initiative by Chris Pronger, Jarome Iginla, Jeremy Roenick and Robert Esche to push the union to accept a cap.
The word around the league is two players -- possibly Pronger and Esche -- placed calls to NHL VP Bill Daly on the weekend directly to see what it would take to get a deal done, which further irritated NHLPA members.
Now that the NHLPA has collapsed on the issue of a hard salary cap -- although it wasn't willing to accept one with a link to revenue -- there's some sense there are players who were nervous about what the future held if the season was cancelled.
According to Roenick, the group was trying to gauge whether players would accept a hard cap. And while Roenick and friends didn't write the actual proposal that was made Monday, they played a role -- another thing that irked NHLPA brethren, many of whom ripped into them on the union's website.
"We probably could've gotten this thing done in the summertime," Chicago forward Matthew Barnaby told reporters yesterday near Buffalo. "Am I mad, no? I want to get back to work. But at the same time, I'm just a little disappointed that it went this far to play poker and to have someone call your bluff."
There's word some players may have insinuated they would make a move to get Goodenow removed from his post if something wasn't done by the union to avoid Bettman's plan of bringing in replacement players.
"We've been saying all along, 'No cap, No cap,' and that's part of negotiations," Senators defenceman Wade Redden said from Edmonton. "It just seems to me that we've been giving and giving and it's got to stop some place.
REDDEN 'SURPRISED'
"I just hope that this gets a deal done. We've been the ones willing to negotiate throughout this whole thing because we just want to play the game. It's pretty obvious how important it is we feel about playing. It was just surprising to hear everything changed (about accepting a cap) ... that's for sure."