Good lord that conclusion to the DD one
We've entered hyperbole territory.
Good lord that conclusion to the DD one
Not complaining about particular scores at all, but I'll never get IGN and especially Gameinformer systems.
Why not 8.8 or 9.0? What makes it worth exactly 7.75 and not 7.7 or 7.8? Do they just punch two possible scores in a random number generator and let it decide between them?
So it looks like biggest "-" are:
-Performance issues.
-"Empty" open-world.
-Side missions.
I haven't finished Gravity Rush 2, Horizon or Nioh post game yet. Mouse is hovering over the pre-order button. Brain, please be reasonable.
I already knew they would be good. The games been out in Japan, its a great success. It just would have been an amusing upstart if it became the highest rated PS4 game. It still might....meh who cares, the reviews are really good now. It's by FAR the best reviewed Taro game.
I love Nier 1 story but surprised about the praises this one is getting, considering it was ignored with the first game reviews and reviewers don't tend to like "anime" stories as much. Seems like it's going to be more Nier and less Drakengard.
I haven't finished Gravity Rush 2, Horizon or Nioh post game yet. Mouse is hovering over the pre-order button. Brain, please be reasonable.
Strange request, but, are any of these Nier reviews by people who didn't really like Platinum's previous work?
I'm not a huge fan of theirs, so, I'm curious if anyone else came from that angle.
Third one is weird since I thought the side missions were one of the strongest points. They all have great (often very depressing) story attached and none of them felt like a slot. Probably the biggest improvement over the original Nier.
Third one is weird since I thought the side missions were one of the strongest points. They all have great (often very depressing) story attached and none of them felt like a slog. Probably the biggest improvement over the original Nier.
Ito, Taro, FFXVI, let's go!
Strange request, but, are any of these Nier reviews by people who didn't really like Platinum's previous work?
I'm not a huge fan of theirs, so, I'm curious if anyone else came from that angle.
Nier 2 is surprisingly un-anime outside the fan service and one specific trope imho
http://www.cgmagonline.com/reviews/nier-automata-revew-oddball-masterpiece/ - 10
http://www.digitallydownloaded.net/2017/03/review-nier-automata-greatest-game-ever.html - 10
If this stays in the 90s, oh my goodness...
Nah, Taro actually writes stories and charactersSo, Taro on the path to become the new Miyazaki
Not complaining about particular scores at all, but I'll never get IGN and especially Gameinformer systems.
Why not 8.8 or 9.0? What makes it worth exactly 7.75 and not 7.7 or 7.8? Do they just punch two possible scores in a random number generator and let it decide between them?
Damn..Nah, Taro actually writes stories and characters
Maybe they are critisizing the actual design, rather the story.
I second this request. I'm interested in N:A for Yoko Taro's weirdness, but I never actually played a Platinum game and liked it.
Ito, Taro, FFXVI, let's go!
HOLD!
I wanna see Taro show the XV team who's boss.
2014?
lol
Nah, Taro actually writes stories and characters
But as I mentioned, the design is pretty good too. There weren't any side missions in the game where I felt like "I can't believe I have to do this crap," which there is so much of in the first Nier. It was all very reasonable.
I haven't finished Gravity Rush 2, Horizon or Nioh post game yet. Mouse is hovering over the pre-order button. Brain, please be reasonable.
This is 100% a sequel to Nier first. Platinum did a great job crafting everything but it's 100% Nier not Bayonetta or MGR
I'm not even close yet I have this preorder what's wrong with this year. Ah well Yoko deserves it keep nier aliveUgh, I haven't finished Horizon yet though...