The hyperbole in this thread is amazing. This is a very minor loss if you look at Nintendo's yearly income history and its magnitude, and yet the sky is falling. No one's arguing they're doing well, but they're not doing terribly either, just poorly.
Newsflash: The sky at Nintendo is falling. This will be 3 consecutive years of operating losses, and shareholders are losing a tremendous amount of value in the form of lost dividends and a share price that has tumbled significantly since 2007 and will only fall farther based on these projections. They will only take so much before revolting. Nintendo itself might never go bankrupt, although I think you do not fully grasp how fast they can burn through their cash, it's not only via profit and loss that those funds evaporate, there is also internal reinvestment. But Nintendo will not exist as we know them without a significant turnaround.
I think that'd be too confusing, honestly. I think they can still release another console, just make low price a priority. I'm talking $200 at launch kinda like what you said.i suggested this in the media create thread, but i wonder if nintendo could have two handheld lines. one would essentially by a hybrid and hook up to the tv. essentially a gamepad you can take with you. somehow get it out for $200 (wii u level graphics, more tablet-y).
the other one would be an inexpensive one. it'd be smaller and have games that require much smaller teams. a $100 device with $20 games at retail and a $200 device with $50 games at retail. the two would interact with each other somehow and both be out by the end of 2016.
i think they're right to aim for the family market, but software prices are awful. they could bring the game boy name back for the smaller one too, since it doesn't have the confusion (and maybe disinterest) that ds does.
also, the virtual console should be an actual thing that's supported by an decently sized internal team, working on and releasing roms on a steady schedule.
How does Iwata exactly care about games?
I guess he could still develop games for the company.Any chance of Iwata staying on in a non CEO role? Or is this debacle a gone and erased from history kinda deal?
So they haven't even SOLD/SHIPPED 2.8m Wii-Us? O_O!
What is the Wii U's WW LTD?
Any chance of Iwata staying on in a non CEO role? Or is this debacle a gone and erased from history kinda deal?
The hyperbole in this thread is amazing. This is a very minor loss if you look at Nintendo's yearly income history and its magnitude, and yet the sky is falling. No one's arguing they're doing well, but they're not doing terribly either, just poorly.
Wow, your better than that. Very selfish of usIn all honesty, this just makes me more hyped for the surely-coming Nintendo Direct for January.
RRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWRRRRRRRRRR BBBPPPTTTTSCHHHHHGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Unsurprising in the slightest, and investors wont be happy. Not sure how they're going to respond. Wait for Mario Kart/Smash wont cut it, but this is Nintendo.
The Wii U's fate was sealed at e3 2013 when it was revealed that Kingdom Hearts 3 and Final Fantasy XV would be skipping Wii U in favor of the PS4 and even the Xbox One. How do you secure Kingdom Hearts 3D for your handheld, but not KH3, which was arguably the most hyped up game reveal since Zelda Twilight Princess. If I was Iwata, I would be trying to fund down ports of those key titles which are definitely going to be commercial darlings. You don't need all 3rd Party support, Nintendo. Just the ones that matter most. But, again, it's too late.
My Wii U will be used for Smash Bros, Mario Kart, and whatever other quirky games they deliver, until the next gen. But I feel like Sony has already won my time and attention.
Any chance of Iwata staying on in a non CEO role? Or is this debacle a gone and erased from history kinda deal?
Can't survive strictly with first party games. GameCube all over again.
Time for new hardware. Drop the Wii U already. Drop the 'Wii' all together. It's time for a new product that is neither Wii nor DS.
The hyperbole in this thread is amazing. This is a very minor loss if you look at Nintendo's yearly income history and its magnitude, and yet the sky is falling. No one's arguing they're doing well, but they're not doing terribly either, just poorly.
What is the Wii U's WW LTD?
I don't see any way out of this mess for Nintendo other than finding a partner. The most obvious one, and the only one that would send their stock skyrocketing, is Apple. But I have a hard time imagining that partnership not being terrible, both from a game quality and long-term profit standpoint.
The best possible partner would be Sony. Drop the Wii U and make PS4 games. Sony drops the Vita and leaves portables for Nintendo. Not a 3rd-party relationship, a partnership. Would be amazing. Unfortunately, they'd both probably rather die.
Outside of that...Amazon? Microsoft? I don't know, but they either need a co-branded machine or an exclusive software partnership. Going mobile will kill them faster than sticking to their guns, and going 3rd party will begin a long slide into irrelevance.
The hyperbole in this thread is amazing. This is a very minor loss if you look at Nintendo's yearly income history and its magnitude, and yet the sky is falling. No one's arguing they're doing well, but they're not doing terribly either, just poorly.
Of course, Nintendo would never do something so smart and forward-looking. Instead we'll get another year of Iwata's excuses and their next console will have smell-o-vision and no account system.
The hyperbole in this thread is amazing. This is a very minor loss if you look at Nintendo's yearly income history and its magnitude, and yet the sky is falling. No one's arguing they're doing well, but they're not doing terribly either, just poorly.
Yeah. I don't know how public companies work in Japan compared to the US, but could a hedge fund take a stake in Nintendo and try and cause or change in management?
ie. Dan Loeb and Yahoo and hiring Marissa Mayer and keeping his people on the board? Or him trying to get Sony to break up?
Is it possible? Sony is a Japanese company but it also trades on the NYSE. Nintendo doesn't trade on the NYSE so the regulations I believe would be different.
losses can be carried forward to a future year and used to lower the tax paid. So when nintendo was expecting a profit they planned to use these tax assets, which now won't be happening as they are going to be unprofitable.ELI5 "deferred tax assets" ? They were planning on paying back some of last year "taxes" with this year "profits"? But since this year is bad, they can't use that cushion to soften last year bad performance?
Ugh, accounting.
Back to the drawing board. Hopefully they're already there.I wonder where they will go from here.
At this point, I'm even more hyped for the Investor Meeting. Good thing they faced reality, though (even if I feel 3DS could end up a little higher than that, around 14 millions, but we'll see).
Damn at those profit forecasts. Daaaamn.
PS3 lost, what, over $5 billion?
Time to go region-free so people can import shit.
That's the worst part about this, it's been obvious for like two years or so now that Iwata needed to go...Why does it have to take so long?Is anybody really surprised? Honest question.
Iwata has been saying "let's wait it out. One game can change everything" all year. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the sales of the Wii U (and Wii U software) have been in the toilet. since. launch.
This should come as a surprise to absolutely nobody.
Nintendo needs a major shake-up at this point. They needed one ages ago, but now the writing is on the wall. There is no recovery to be had by staying the course. It's time for heads to roll.
I think the main issue is what exactly are they going to do to turn things around. With both consoles revised down and the big guns for the 3DS already released, what now?The hyperbole in this thread is amazing. This is a very minor loss if you look at Nintendo's yearly income history and its magnitude, and yet the sky is falling. No one's arguing they're doing well, but they're not doing terribly either, just poorly.
In all honesty, this just makes me more hyped for the surely-coming Nintendo Direct for January.
This is all just a feint so that investors will be pleased and amazed once the Wii U actually does sell 9 million by the end of the FY.
Iwata is playing four dimensional chess here.
Remember, these new guidances have the previous LTD built in.
So Wii U went from:
9 million prediction + 3.45 million LTD = 12.45 million LTD as of March 31st, 2014
to:
2.8 million prediction + 3.45 million LTD = 6.25 million LTD as of March 31st, 2014
"We understand you concerns and ask you to wait just a little longer. We will be be releasing hit titles such as Super Smash Bros. for Wii U, Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze, and Mario Kart 8. We will continue to release further big first party titles later in the year. 2014 will mark the year of the Wii U. Have faith and please understand."RRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWRRRRRRRRRR BBBPPPTTTTSCHHHHHGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Unsurprising in the slightest, and investors wont be happy. Not sure how they're going to respond. Wait for Mario Kart/Smash wont cut it, but this is Nintendo.
Why are people expecting a big direct thing month? Its not like they're going to start developing a ton of Wii U games in response to this news and anything expecting to be released after Zelda is probably going to be held off until their next console. I could see a normal 3DS direct but nothing special.