NO Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 on Switch 2 at launch!

E3nkgkqCHTUu0UbP.jpeg

she deserves an apology
 
Cdpr made a cp2077 port in a few weeks.

Stuff like this should be fined with like 20% of yearly revenue.
Yeah I have no idea when Acti received their DK and with the wording no BO7 on Switch 2 at launch wonder how far behind it will be

Even if its a pure shit port I would think Acti would love that Switch 2 revenue
 
Cdpr made a cp2077 port in a few weeks.

Stuff like this should be fined with like 20% of yearly revenue.
They didn't port cp2077 in a few weeks; the build they showed off back in June was a few weeks old which is where all that confusion came from.

I think I read that someone from CDPR had said they were working on the NS2 port since last year.
 
I don't know. I was not expecting COD this year honestly. Or not the same COD as ps5/Xbox. That seemed unlikely. Maybe MS didn't get the dev kits as quickly as we all assumed.

We will see if NS2 gets an older port that could have been worked on for a bit. Like Modern Warfare or some other version.

I also wonder if MS/Nintendo struck a deal for certain "OTHER Games" in an annual substitute for COD. For example…if the big November game is a scaled down version of Halo MCC. Personally, i consider that a substitute for COD.
 
There is such an easy fix to this, it baffles me. Nintendo, who needs very minimal third-party games to begin with, doesn't do it.

When it comes to these big games(COD/GTA/BF)if they don't hit day and date, the publisher, loses their license, to publish on Nintendo platforms, or some other kind of punitive measure.

No COD? No minecraft.

NO BF6? No Sims.

The platform is absolutely massive, and regardless of what people here think, all these companies sell a ton of software on Nintendo platforms.

When you got leverage, use it.
 
Last edited:
There is such an easy fix to this, it baffles me. Nintendo, who needs very minimal third-party games to begin with, doesn't do it.

When it comes to these big games(COD/GTA/BF)if they don't hit day and date, the publisher, loses their license, to publish on Nintendo platforms, or some other kind of punitive measure.

No COD? No minecraft.

NO BF6? No Sims.

The platform is absolutely massive, and regardless of what people here think, all these companies sell a ton of software on Nintendo platforms.

When you got leverage, use it.
I agree with this except for BF6. Which i find unlikely. No COD, No Sims, and especially Minecraft. (I know mojang takes it time with ports to new consoles, but i am surprised Mojang didn't have a dev kit).

Edit: maybe there is an older COD coming, or maybe this new COD is just running behind because of dev kits.

Again though, if we got Halo trilogy instead. I would consider that a good alternative for 2025.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if it could be related to a space problem, you would need to buy an sd express of at least 512 which is around 100 bucks just to be able to install the game.
 
E3nkgkqCHTUu0UbP.jpeg

she deserves an apology

…Because COD was a mainstay staple on Nintendo platforms before MS bought Activision?

Dummy Feeling Dumb GIF



There is such an easy fix to this, it baffles me. Nintendo, who needs very minimal third-party games to begin with, doesn't do it.

When it comes to these big games(COD/GTA/BF)if they don't hit day and date, the publisher, loses their license, to publish on Nintendo platforms, or some other kind of punitive measure.

No COD? No minecraft.

NO BF6? No Sims.

The platform is absolutely massive, and regardless of what people here think, all these companies sell a ton of software on Nintendo platforms.

When you got leverage, use it.

That's one surefire way to lose billions in revenue.
Some of you people crack me up.
 
Blame Nintendo for releasing yet another subpar console with two-gen old tech after this commitment was made.

Let's not pretend Microsoft gave a shit what the next Switch would be. They were handing out deals left and right. Whatever it took to convince regulators to let the deal go through. It was all typical Microsoft bullshit.
 
Last edited:
It's odd because Blops 7 is still getting a PS4/Xbox One version. So if anything this game should be easy to get running relative to future titles. I mean if anything it will get harder after this.

Makes me wonder if Microsoft is rethinking what supporting Switch 2 for 10 years actually means. Maybe that just port Warzone and support that for 10 years? Porting older cods instead? Cloud version?
Supposedly Nintendo is mandating things like DLSS , and apparently you have to implement Nvidia's proprietary software through the NVN2 api; so, there is no "port to switch" button.
 
Last edited:
Let's not pretend Microsoft gave a shit what the next Switch would be. They were handing out deals left and right. Whatever it took to convince regulators to let the deal go through. It was all typical Microsoft bullshit.

Weird comment. Switch 2 represents another platform to sell a decent amount of copies of their games, including COD. There's a legal commitment in place, and COD is fully multiplatform.

I fully expect a port of BLOPS7 post launch.

Nobody plays COD titles on the Switch so there wouldnt be any revenue.

because there were no COD games released on the Switch.
 
Last edited:
Weird comment. Switch 2 represents another platform to sell a decent amount of copies of their games, including COD. There's a legal commitment in place, and COD is fully multiplatform.

I fully expect a port of BLOPS7 post launch.

Nothing weird about it. Microsoft pledged COD on Nintendo "the same day as Xbox" and now they are not doing what they pledged.
 
Nothing weird about it. Microsoft pledged COD on Nintendo "the same day as Xbox" and now they are not doing what they pledged.

It's a new console, launching with limited devkits delivered not that long before launch. Nintendo themselves know when they delivered their kits to third party studios.

The fact that the likes of Square Enix didn't didn't have a single AAA RPG available for the Switch 2's launch should tell you how rocky the initial process has been.

I'd expect most 3rd parties to be day and date from next year.
 
It's a new console, launching with limited devkits delivered not that long before launch. Nintendo themselves know when they delivered their kits to third party studios.

The fact that the likes of Square Enix didn't didn't have a single AAA RPG available for the Switch 2's launch should tell you how rocky the initial process has been.

I'd expect most 3rd parties to be day and date from next year.

The likes of Square Enix didn't parade around a 10 year deal. Microsoft did.
 
Dat unprecedented commitment and binding partnership tho, crud news for our fellow ultimate gafer GigaBowser :P
Good Sir, plz, give us current gen Duty port :goog_crying:
Maybe u get lastgen late port if lucky, nintendo peasant :goog_biggrin:
donald-duck-please.gif

This shit is why I come to neogaf lmaooo. I busted out laughing reading this and have chuckled for the last couple of minutes lol.
 
Top Bottom