It would've gotten better if they just widened the road like people in the area wanted them to. But they opted for the toll roads instead, which not many are going to spring $10 each way for. Why? Because it's an absurd amount of money. And when it doesn't make the revenue they project it to, the people in the area are going to be fitting the bill for their corrupt bullshit.
The problem is that the speeders eventually catch up to the slow pokes and create bumper to bumper traffic even though it's not necessary. If the speeders are able to go ahead then you still get good separation. Speed is rarely the primary factor in an accident.?? Highway speeds are already ridiculous and above decent percentage chances of survival.
I see this is a thread where no one knows people who've died on the roads for no good reason.
Holy fuck thats stupid.
In Canada, atleast Ontario, theres a 10kmph buffer. I think Schoolzone is the only exception.
So does that mean we get to pull over all the cops on capital that do 60 between downtown and 440?
highway speed limits in this country are antiquated at best. This just reeks of "we need more income" rather than a public safety measure.
It would've gotten better if they just widened the road like people in the area wanted them to. But they opted for the toll roads instead, which not many are going to spring $10 each way for. Why? Because it's an absurd amount of money. And when it doesn't make the revenue they project it to, the people in the area are going to be fitting the bill for their corrupt bullshit.
highway speed limits in this country are antiquated at best. This just reeks of "we need more income" rather than a public safety measure.
Fuck that. These highway speed limits are bullshit anyways. 65mph on a highway in a modern car is ridiculous and an archaic idea of what a safe driving speed is.
Widening the roads doesn't do jack shit. It also makes the roads along the popular exits even worse, and then what, are you going to widen those too?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_demand
The only way at this point for every US city to maintain traffic flow would be to remove drivers from the road, which means alternative transportation. It doesn't sound like you're interested in solving the problem for the city as much as for yourself.Considering that the bill they passed to get these toll roads approved prevents these adjacent roads from being maintained/widened/changed, no, they can't. But that's against the NC State Constitution as is. But they didn't give a shit even though people raised holy hell about it because they knew what was going on. And if you've seen the exits in the area, you'd know that they already needed to be widened. But instead of doing that, they keep trying these moronic tricks to try and maintain traffic flow (Hint: Not working at all).
Yep. If they want this to be taken seriously they need to kick up the limit to the 85th percentile speed like every traffic engineer with sense already suggests.
No. The laws almost always have exceptions for emergency and public safety vehicles. Which the police fall under.
Yeah, same.Never heard of this so called "9 mph buffer zone". I was always told it was 5 mph but that an extra strict cop could still ticket you if they really wanted.
The only way at this point for every US city to maintain traffic flow would be to remove drivers from the road, which means alternative transportation. It doesn't sound like you're interested in solving the problem for the city as much as for yourself.
Yeah, same.
Considering that the bill they passed to get these toll roads approved prevents these adjacent roads from being maintained/widened/changed, no, they can't. But that's against the NC State Constitution as is. But they didn't give a shit even though people raised holy hell about it because they knew what was going on. And if you've seen the exits in the area, you'd know that they already needed to be widened. But instead of doing that, they keep trying these moronic tricks to try and maintain traffic flow (Hint: Not working at all).
Never heard of 9, but have heard of 5. I always do 4, just to be on the safe side.
Speeds limits always seemed weird to me. This may have changed since I left, but I remember a lot of freeways in the Chicago suburbs were marked at 55 MPH, yet from my experience traffic was routinely moving at 70-78. Technically you of course could get pulled over going 20 above the limit, but 55 seemed unreasonably slow for these big 4 lane freeways.
So, alternative transportation?It sounds to me like you have no interest in learning how the area in question is growing and how it can't handle any more traffic on the roads despite them continuing to expand.
What's the point of a limit of you have a buffer?
Yeah um no... it's the 85th percentile of speed. 85% of drivers go that speed or less.They're typically designed with the understanding that people will go a little over.
So they say "ok this road is safest at 60 MPH, so since people will go 10 over we'll put it at 50 and they can feel like they're getting away with something while still driving safely."
What's the point of a limit of you have a buffer?
Wyoming bumped their interstate speed limits to 80mph and they let everyone know that with that concession, they aren't fucking around with it. People so far are fine with that agreement.
And 40% attempt 10 mph under.Atlanta interstate drivers laugh at that 9mph buffer zone.
Wyoming bumped their interstate speed limits to 80mph and they let everyone know that with that concession, they aren't fucking around with it. People so far are fine with that agreement.
/end of threadSCCCAAARREEE TACTICS
So, alternative transportation?
Aren't you the one arguing for widening the road? Yet "can't handle any more traffic on the roads despite them continuing to expand."
My piece of garbage 1991 Cherokee that struggled to even hit highway speed limits (70-75 here) had it so I'm going to say it's safe to assume the vast majority have cruise control.