North Korea begs for food.

Status
Not open for further replies.
vas_a_morir said:
If you don't mind, could you please elaborate on your snide remark?

You got the luck of the draw when it comes to the country you were born in? Do I have to spell out how stupid your post was about the North Korean people and the situation they are in?
 
Kyoufu said:
How is North Korea so bad when you look down below you and see a striving South Korea?

The people in the south actually know what they're doing. The people living in NK are convinced that they've got the best government. They think that what they've got now is as good as it gets.
 
Ether_Snake said:
If they reformed and stopped investing in their military like idiots, there would be no food problem.

Anyway, if we don't give them food, there will be a revolution, and the regime will be eliminated and the Koreas reunited. So there's your answer.

For shortages always = revolution. Always.


Just like last time there was a famine in NK?

people don't seem to realize that NK does not fall under any usual human patterns. The people aren't going to *just* rise up or *just* fight back or *just* think for themselves. It's different when you don't have any forum to do it whatsoever, when your government will kill you for starting any rebellion whatsoever, when they'll easily get away with covering it up, and when nobody else will follow you out of fear of the government or better yet--rat you out and get you disciplined or killed for even thinking about rebelling.

These rebelling middle eastern countries had it bad, but NK goes beyond complex when you start talking about revolution. Large portions of the population would have to be deprogrammed (and nursed back to health) before revolution could even be on the table...
 
lightless_shado said:
The people in the south actually know what they're doing. The people living in NK are convinced that they've got the best government. They think that what they've got now is as good as it gets.

They've been programmed to accept that they have the best government ever and no one knows better than the glorious leader Kim Jong Il. Even doubt this and say goodbye to your life and that of your family.
 
BertramCooper said:
I don't see the North Korean people fighting back until the information barrier that envelops the country begins to crumble.

They know nothing but suffering and think the rest of the world is worse off than they are. Until they wake up, it's not going to change.

Some of the world's financial leaders need to, independently of any Government or state, organize, and arrange to have giant balloons with pamphlets of how awesome the world is and how shitty NK's situation is, and have them fly over Pyongyang and pop, raining down info on them.

Like Philanthropy. Where's Solid Snake when you need him.
 
Meus Renaissance said:
Honestly at this rate I'm going to have to get on anti-depressants. If something as simple as food is being politicised/debated, there is no hope for this world

People feel safe saying dickish things behind the relative safety of computer anonymity. I don't think of myself as a violent person but if someone suggested starving people to my face they might get punched.
 
Meus Renaissance said:
So a country should be left to starve because their government is stubborn and irrational? Where do you people even come from. To my left, people are being attacked for being different. To my right people are being killed for nothing. And here I read things like this?

XMonkey, I'll pay for your first session if you meet a psychiatrist. I have hardly anything in my account but I'm willing to help out.


There is no way we would know if the food gets to them.
 
I'm not going to gloat over the fact that poor people are starving, but the North's government needs to stop their juche agriculture policy and realise that to solve the food situation they need to open up and trade with the rest of the world. The North is rich in minerals and resources and heavy industry is one of the few areas where the North's economy actually works so if they could get to a point where they can trade with other nations (which won't happen as long as the US does everything it can to stifle it, just like Cuba) effectively it would solve their food problems.
 
The question isn't:

How do you leave a starving nation to a mad hat dictator?

Because we are already doing that.

The question is:

Do you leave a starving nation starving?
 
vas_a_morir said:
Say, I wonder how South Korea is doing under the occupation of Imperialist American murderers:

SNSD+GEE+at+Dusan.jpg


Oh. I see.

Better to eat grass than listen to that shit!

No seriously, I want to know why he is just asking for food this time, instead of using military threats to gain leverage? Why the change of tactics?

If anyone is interested in the day to day goings on in the DPRK, check out this blog Good Friends USA. It's savage some of the things you'll read, but really interesting.
 
scotcheggz said:
Better to eat grass than listen to that shit!

No seriously, I want to know why he is just asking for food this time, instead of using military threats to gain leverage? Why the change of tactics?.

Maybe his offensive missile system isn't going as planned. Gettin' desperate.
 
Zinga said:
they need to open up and trade with the rest of the world.

I admit I don't know much about NK, but isn't it the other way around in the form of embargoes to stop them from building up their nuclear programs?
 
CaptYamato said:
There is no way we would know if the food gets to them.

North Korean: What happened to the food?
CaptYamato: Well, we didn't know whether or not it would get to you. So we decided to not bother anyway.

oKmRD.gif
 
Count Dookkake said:
We should only respond if Kim Jong Il gets on his knees, places his head on the ground and begs.

That would be delicious.

Someone should hire Lifetouch to take the picture and distribute it the world over. I would gladly wear it as my desktop image.
 
From The Dust said:
lulz. but seriously, part of me says we should due to morals, but part of me says the government is just going to hoarde it all. decisions.
The second part negates the first part. How is it moral to help NK authoriries hoarde it to themselves?
 
vas_a_morir said:
Say, I wonder how South Korea is doing under the occupation of Imperialist American murderers:

SNSD+GEE+at+Dusan.jpg


Oh. I see.


North Korea wouldn't like them because they have two America spies in the group.
 
Meus Renaissance said:
Honestly at this rate I'm going to have to get on anti-depressants. If something as simple as food is being politicised/debated, there is no hope for this world

So how many pounds of food have you donated to GLORIOUS LEADER and his subjects?

You seem so personally invested in this and unwilling (unable?) to understand why people hold a view that opposes yours.
 
xbhaskarx said:
Like the people did in the 90s?

"In the early and mid-1990s, an estimated 1 million died in a famine."

Oh wait they didn't overthrow the government, they just starved to death.
What do you suggest we do, give them food? It doesn't even reach the people who need them and only serves to strengthen the regime further.
 
Devolution said:
You got the luck of the draw when it comes to the country you were born in? Do I have to spell out how stupid your post was about the North Korean people and the situation they are in?

I simply feel you have misunderstood me, especially since you are acting so hostile, condescending, and pretentious, while my intended meaning should have evoked no such reaction. I've read several books on the subject of Korean-style Communism, as well as seen every documentary imaginable, including two last week. (One about gymnasts in Korea and the other about an American defector) I am well aware of the "brainwashing" people have endured in that country, although I was not born there. Here is what I wanted to convey:

1. Kim Jong Il must make concessions regarding transparency of food distribution in order to gain assistance from outside nations, particularly, the United States.

2. Because of this, if Koreans should die because of refusal of aid, Kim Jong Il's own actions could be interpreted as the cause.

3. This is a natural consequence of a one-party system being supported blindly by the people.

4. Even so, I acknowledge that due to overwhelming brainwashing, they had little choice in the matter, and thus do not deserve it.

I hope it clears things up for you. I lived in East Asia for a brief period, and called many South Korean servicemen my friends. We discussed the matter extensively, and through these conversations, I feel I have a better understanding than most Westerners.

However, if in fact you still believe my opinion reeks of privileged ignorance, I would like for you to elaborate further so that I could understand the situation better.
 
vas_a_morir said:
I simply feel you have misunderstood me, especially since you are acting so hostile, condescending, and pretentious, while my intended meaning should have evoked no such reaction. I've read several books on the subject of Korean-style Communism, as well as seen every documentary imaginable, including two last week. (One about gymnasts in Korea and the other about an American defector) I am well aware of the "brainwashing" people have endured in that country, although I was not born there. Here is what I wanted to convey:

1. Kim Jong Il must make concessions regarding transparency of food distribution in order to gain assistance from outside nations, particularly, the United States.

2. Because of this, if Koreans should die because of refusal of aid, Kim Jong Il's own actions could be interpreted as the cause.

3. This is a natural consequence of a one-party system being supported blindly by the people.

4. Even so, I acknowledge that due to overwhelming brainwashing, they had little choice in the matter, and thus do not deserve it.

I hope it clears things up for you. I lived in East Asia for a brief period, and called many South Korean servicemen my friend. We discussed the matter extensively, and through these conversations, I feel I have a better understanding than most Westerners.

However, if in fact you still believe my opinion reeks of privileged ignorance, I would like for you to elaborate further so that I could understand the situation better.

That is kind of my issue here and how you keep stating it.
 
Meus Renaissance said:
North Korean: What happened to the food?
CaptYamato: Well, we didn't know whether or not it would get to you. So we decided to not bother anyway.

They're not starving because of bad breaks and because Great Leader Kim is doing his best but it's not working out. They're starving because of the way he runs the country and distributes food.

The opinion that the food will likely not get to the people who need it most is a valid one. You can sit here and accuse people of being morally bankrupt or sick, but it's likely that the people you think won't starve if other countries aid will starve anyway.

We're only reinforcing Kim's craziness and abuse if there are no strings attached to giving aid.
 
Devolution said:
That is kind of my issue here and how you keep stating it.

I'm afraid I do not understand the meaning of this sentence.

EDIT: Nevermind, I see the bolded part.

If you are offended by that statement, I am still convinced you have misinterpreted my rhetoric a bit.

I imagine we both can agree that the government in North Korea receives what is apparently described as unanimous support, and thus that should not be an area of contention. Thus, I imagine you are upset by my adverb, "blindly" which may have a negative connotation. However, I assure you, I simply used it to describe the cricumstances surrounding the people as I understand them, rather than judgments on the people themselves. "Blindly" simply alludes to the lack of available information that one could use to form more varied opinions regarding government, society, and so on. Furthermore, in religious rhetoric, the term "blind" is used in various ways. Sometimes "blind" is used to describe someone who cannot see the truth around them. I believe this could be used that way regarding North Koreans. However, "blind faith" is used meaning complete trust without distraction. If you ask a Christian "Do you blindly follow Jesus Christ," the most likely would quickly chime in "yes, without question." From the accounts I've read and heard from both North Koreans and refugees, this would appear to be the mindset of North Koreans. In fact, you called them "Brainwashed," so I imagine you agree with me on that point. However, as I have never lived in North Korea, one could say that any attempt at evaluating the situation could be argued as "reeking of privileged ignorance." So, in that regard, I will gladly concede the point.

Where's Summary Man when you need him?
 
Such an unfortunate situation for the people of North Korea, the vast majority of which are brainwashed into the cult of personality surrounding Kim Jong-Il. That being said, the question of whether or not the United States should be tripping over itself to provide aid to an enemy country is a tough one. Like others have said, it's likely that the food won't make its way to those who need it, and instead strengthens those who need it least.

Summary: Shit sucks.
 
Can't trade with DPRK. Tariffs are insanely high. Same with Belarus.

Food will be politicized cause EVERYTHING about that country is.
 
J2d said:
Let them starve to death.

Bro, it's not like millions of people should suffer because we don't want to help one fucking crazy fool in the process. I understand no one likes Kim, I bet you deep down a lot of NKoreans don't like his ass either, but the situation isn't exactly cut and dry.

Hopefully this humbles that crazy lunatic a bit, we should parachute crates of food covered in spray paint saying "Hey, we here Kim Jong whatsit is having trouble being awesome? We got some spare food from the South Koreans here, they're doing awesome - and they're feeling generous."

I don't know how to 'de-program' someone, but a splash of reality is probably one of the steps.
 
Kinitari said:
Bro, it's not like millions of people should suffer because we don't want to help one fucking crazy fool in the process. I understand no one likes Kim, I bet you deep down a lot of NKoreans don't like his ass either, but the situation isn't exactly cut and dry.

Hopefully this humbles that crazy lunatic a bit, we should parachute crates of food covered in spray paint saying "Hey, we here Kim Jong whatsit is having trouble being awesome? We got some spare food from the South Koreans here, they're doing awesome - and they're feeling generous."

I don't know how to 'de-program' someone, but a splash of reality is probably one of the steps.
But it's not like Kim cares about his people. I think he WILL keep it for himself and his cronies, so it's cut and dry to me:

If we give food, Kim and his cronies dine while the masses starve.
If we don't give food, Kim and his cronies starve with the masses.

Either way, the masses starve, so we are choosing between feeding Kim and not feeding Kim.
 
J2d said:
Let them starve to death.
So let millions of innocent men, women, and children die because you don't like the leader? What makes you any better person then Kim Jon il when you say that?
 
dojokun said:
But it's not like Kim cares about his people. I think he WILL keep it for himself and his cronies, so it's cut and dry to me:

If we give food, Kim and his cronies dine while the masses starve.
If we don't give food, Kim and his cronies starve with the masses.

Either way, the masses starve, so we are choosing between feeding Kim and not feeding Kim.

This is a very simplistic assertion. Here let me try.

If we monitor the food, from source to stomach, than we solve all problems.
 
If we give aid to North Korea without making sure it goes to the people, its worthless. Just like in Somalia, the powerful will hoard it and use the aid as a tool to make themselves more powerful.
 
Ashes1396 said:
This is a very simplistic assertion. Here let me try.

If we monitor the food, from source to stomach, than we solve all problems.
I doubt North Korea's government will happily let us enter their country and control distribution every step of the way.
 
XMonkey said:
As much as it sucks for the innocents in the population, the US shouldn't give them food.


you would change your tune if you saw some of the horrors going on over there. You know shit is real bad when the damn government is begging for food, and they dont give a rats ass about the general population.
 
Kalnos said:
Uhm.. North Korea, how does it work?

I don't want to talk to a political scientist, ya'll mother fuckaz lyin', be gettin me pissed.


dojokun said:
I doubt North Korea's government will happily let us enter their country and control distribution every step of the way.

Then, I doubt the US is going to give them food. Sad, but I think the right stance to make.
 
Kinitari said:
Bro, it's not like millions of people should suffer because we don't want to help one fucking crazy fool in the process. I understand no one likes Kim, I bet you deep down a lot of NKoreans don't like his ass either, but the situation isn't exactly cut and dry.
Frustration is all. I shouldn't waste my time thinking about it since it leads to absolutely nothing.
 
Kalnos said:
Uhm.. North Korea, how does it work?

Perhaps you are missing the gist of my point. Or you cannot comprehend the link between the first sentence I typed and the second/third.

My point was that simplistic assertions, such as the ones that were declared are futile arguments.
 
And when we give them food, he'll go on TV and say how "The USA has given the dear leader food because the dear leader is just that awesome."


It is such a lose-lose proposition. Let people starve or give support for Lil' Kim.


It really does suck. There is no military option. There is no revolution that can happen from within. Just sucks.
 
~Kinggi~ said:
you would change your tune if you saw some of the horrors going on over there. You know shit is real bad when the damn government is begging for food, and they dont give a rats ass about the general population.
I've read about what goes on over there. It wouldn't change my position that the US should not give them food.
 
dojokun said:
But it's not like Kim cares about his people. I think he WILL keep it for himself and his cronies, so it's cut and dry to me:

If we give food, Kim and his cronies dine while the masses starve.
If we don't give food, Kim and his cronies starve with the masses.

Either way, the masses starve, so we are choosing between feeding Kim and not feeding Kim.

If we were to give aid, we do it with conditions. If he's desperate enough to beg, maybe he'll let us do it our way. If he doesn't, then yeah, fuck him I guess - but I think if both sides swallow their pride a bit, make some concessions, we could probably save some lives.
 
Ashes1396 said:
My point was that simplistic assertions, such as the ones that were declared are futile arguments.
His assertion was simplistic, but assuming that the North Korean government would give us the opportunity to monitor and oversee exactly where that food goes isn't any better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom