Great picture of Maxine.
Damn nanomachines.Do you want to know how G-Fex escaped the Cena bots? Nanomachines.
So yes.
Lol, poor guy only knows like three or four guys in the game. He thought Kane was the oldest guy running in the game.
Wait, what?I was reading this weeks observer and Kane got removed from Hall of Fame consideration for the next 2 years because he didn't receive more than 10% of the vote.
Wait, what?
The WWE HoF or the Observer Hall of Fame? Meltzer hates Kane. Not a surprise, if it's that.
Nice. Just bought a couple for my family as Christmas presents.
Observer has historically disliked big man wrestlers. Andre didn't get in until years after his death.Observer Hall of Fame, my bad for not clarifying. It's the active wrestlers, former wrestlers, reporters, and historians that didn't vote for him. I think the dude is hall of fame worthy. He's one of the best big men ever, has been at or near the top of the card for over a decade, he's had to have drawn a good amount of money over the years, and given all the shit he's had to do storyline wise his character is still great.
I was reading this weeks observer and Kane got removed from Hall of Fame consideration for the next 2 years because he didn't receive more than 10% of the vote.
also I hope you guys enjoy this gif. Use it properly.
I want all of the dancing gimmicks from yesteryear and today in the ring for one colossal segment during Royal Rumble.
Fandangoo. Brodus Clay. Rikishi. Too Cool. Disco Inferno. Alex Wright. Ernest Miller. Norman Smiley. "Dancing with the Stars" Chris Jericho. Jim Ross.
Cap it off with Ron Simmons proclaiming DAMN. Fun times all around.
To be fair, Kane is pretty old.Lol, poor guy only knows like three or four guys in the game. He thought Kane was the oldest guy running in the game.
Observer has historically disliked big man wrestlers. Andre didn't get in until years after his death.
Kane certainly deserves to be in, but it won't happen for years.
Let me tell you right now. If Kane doesn't deserve to be in a wrestling hall of fame, then ninety percent of current inductees don't deserve to be in there either.By what criteria does he deserve to in? He's never drawn and he's not especially famous. He's a decent worker at times. That isn't enough.
Vader was a big draw in WCW and in Japan. LOD are probably the biggest tag team of all time. Konnan was, and still is, one of the biggest draws in Mexico.Let me tell you right now. If Kane doesn't deserve to be in a wrestling hall of fame, then ninety percent of current inductees don't deserve to be in there either.
The Wrestling Observer hall of fame has Vader & LOD in it. Those guys are great, but Kane drew just as much (hell, more) than they did. Now, that certainly has to do with having the WWE machine behind him, but nevertheless. I mean, dude, KONNAN is in the Wrestling Observer Hall of Fame. Konnan deserves to be in, but Kane doesn't? Please.
Hell, the majority of guys in the Observer HoF never drew a dime and couldn't do half the crap that Kane does in the ring, and few have had his longevity.
LOD are the biggest tag team of all time.Let me tell you right now. If Kane doesn't deserve to be in a wrestling hall of fame, then ninety percent of current inductees don't deserve to be in there either.
The Wrestling Observer hall of fame has Vader & LOD in it. Those guys are great, but Kane drew just as much (hell, more) than they did. Now, that certainly has to do with having the WWE machine behind him, but nevertheless. I mean, dude, KONNAN is in the Wrestling Observer Hall of Fame. Konnan deserves to be in, but Kane doesn't? Please.
Hell, the majority of guys in the Observer HoF never drew a dime and couldn't do half the crap that Kane does in the ring, and few have had his longevity.
Dude, I, of course understand why LOD and Vader are in. They certainly deserve to be in, but Kane was a main eventer for a good chunk of the Attitude Era, and has been an upper mid carder and occassional main eventer since then. He's been consistent, healthy, and has pushed merchandise. Hell, the guy starred in his own major theatrical movie that's been the most profitable that WWE has put out. He's also a great wrestler for his size. There's no denying that.LOD are the biggest tag team of all time.
Vader was one of early WCW's biggest heels and one of the most popular gaijins of all time
Konnan was a megastar in Mexico back in the day. People down south used to compare him to Hogan.
Kane is not on those guys' level, but that doesn't mean that he doesn't deserve to be in the HoF. The Observer HoF has plenty of lesser guys in it.Kane has been consistently present, but...the Hall of Fame? With the likes of Bret, Shawn, Austin, Savage, and Steamboat? I don't know, guys.
Btw, I just guessed at those names, but I'm assuming they'd all be in.
Dude, I, of course understand why LOD and Vader are in. They certainly deserve to be in, but Kane was a main eventer for a good chunk of the Attitude Era, and has been an upper mid carder and occassional main eventer since then. He's been consistent, healthy, and has pushed merchandise. Hell, the guy starred in his own major theatrical movie that's been the most profitable that WWE has put out. He's also a great wrestler for his size. There's no denying that.
And Konnan was only a HUGE STAR in Mexico for one or two years. The first chance he got to come to the US, he did, and that was it.
One problem is that in the U.S. some wrestlers focus more on their image than their skills. I understand because I understand the business. I dont criticize them for that, but they should understand that for me wrestling means something more. If a guy doesnt execute a move, I dont pretend that he did. If I miss a move, then I dont ask anyone to make me look good.
Mil Mascaras
The Konnan comeback in 2013 is going to be huge business for AAA. Its crazyLOD are the biggest tag team of all time.
Vader was one of early WCW's biggest heels and one of the most popular gaijins of all time
Konnan was a megastar in Mexico back in the day. People down south used to compare him to Hogan.
And Konnan was only a HUGE STAR in Mexico for one or two years. The first chance he got to come to the US, he did, and that was it.
The Konnan comeback in 2013 is going to be huge business for AAA. Its crazy
My favorite part of AAA is the neglect of copyright laws. Eye Of The Tiger rights? Fuck that. Just come out to it anyways.
My favorite part of AAA is the neglect of copyright laws. Eye Of The Tiger rights? Fuck that. Just come out to it anyways.
Well, that's your opinion. I feel that he excels as a big man wrestler (which has rarely been used as criteria for judging HoF status. Most of the guys in the Observer are subpar or average wrestlers). He's also had a pretty good gimmick.There's more to the criteria than just being involved in the main event and being around for awhile. Kane has never excelled in any regard other than longevity. I know we have the Kane gimmick here but he's nowhere near Hall of Fame quality to me.
My favorite lucha match can't be found on the internet seperately, and that's a shame.
Lizmark vs La Parka 2/3 falls from the first Triplemania is the thing that got me into lucha libre.
Well, that's your opinion. I feel that he excels as a big man wrestler (which has rarely been used as criteria for judging HoF status. Most of the guys in the Observer are subpar or average wrestlers). He's also had a pretty good gimmick.
BTW, I don't really see how you can measure "drawing ability" in the modern era. The territories don't exist anymore, folks. However, like I said, he's had the most profitable movie WWE has put out (and it was a real major theatrical release), so I say he can draw.
The criteria for HoF status isn't opinion, it's based on precedent. You look at guys who are already in, and you compare. Kane is more popular, a better wrestler, and has lasted longer than most of the guys in the Observer HoF.
I guess it depends on how you look at it. I always viewed his original rise to be in 1991, and his star would ebb and flow due to American wrestling commitments (WWF, ECW). I'm not denying that he was a HUGE STAR, but just not consistent, imo.What? Konnan was huge for about 5 years in Mexico before leaving for WCW. And then there's the fact that he is more or less leading lucha back into prominence right now after a stretch where everyone thought WWE was going to kill it and takeover in Mexico
I guess it depends on how you look at it. I always viewed his original rise to be in 1991, and his star would ebb and flow due to American wrestling commitments (WWF, ECW). I'm not denying that he was a HUGE STAR, but just not consistent, imo.
Yes, he is leading a revival, but he's already in. I'm not saying that Konnan shouldn't be in. I haven't argued that any of these guys don't deserve it.
I guess it depends on how you look at it. I always viewed his original rise to be in 1991, and his star would ebb and flow due to American wrestling commitments (WWF, ECW). I'm not denying that he was a HUGE STAR, but just not consistent, imo.
Yes, he is leading a revival, but he's already in. I'm not saying that Konnan shouldn't be in. I haven't argued that any of these guys don't deserve it.
I wouldn't agree that Big Show has been in more main events. Big Show may have been a World Champ in WCW, but he was rarely main eventing anything (he honestly didn't even know how to wrestle at the time). Kane, however, main evented often throughout the AE. Since then, I don't know. The definition of a "main event" doesn't make sense anymore. You have the WWE putting on like 3 or 4 "main events" on one card. I mean, World Title matches now open WM's. And I don't know if Big Show has a higher profile than Kane. I would wager that if you know who Big Show is, then you know who Kane is, and vice versa.Kane being more popular and a better wrestler is extremely debatable. Big Show has been around for around the same time as Kane (guess a few years less) and involved in more main events and had a higher profile. And I wouldn't call him a HoF candidate either.
Most guys in the Observer HoF never had any REAL effect on the wrestling canvas of history. If that's the criteria, then every wrestling HoF would only be filled with like 10-15 guys, instead of the dozens that are in there.It's about the impact and legacy you have, and Kane falls into the same group as an X-Pac. He's a good company man, and he's great and guiding younger wrestlers, but he's not a wrestling legend, and I doubt he would consider himself a legend. I love Owen to death, and he was kind of Kane and X-Pac 'enhancement talent' before either of them, but he's not on there, and I know exactly why.
Like I said, some people will remember Kane fondly as a good worker, but he had no real effect on the wrestling canvas of history.
BTW, I don't give a fuck, but there's no way Kane and X-Pac are in the same group. No way, and I think anyone in the industry would agree with me. Kane was a world champion in an era when it still mattered. Yes, it was just one day, but nevertheless.
WCW towards the very end was getting pretty good. I really liked Steiner as a heel champion who kept putting babyfaces out of action.
I wish WCW survived. While it probably wouldn't be as big as WWE is today, it'd still allow us to have a viable number 2 option. They would certainly be bigger than TNA, if only because of the name really.
What I wouldn't give for HD content of WCW
It would work well.If WWE was run by a competent human, instead of the Network they'd be working on a subscription based online library of all their content, with apps on digital platforms for viewing it, with a premium subscription option that also gives you streaming PPVs each month.