sol_bad said:http://www.vgcharts.org/aconscomps.php?name1=PS3&name2=X360&type=0&align=0
So why were people not screaming that Mcrosoft were in deep shit back on February of 2006?
The amount of Sony hate is amazing.
heh
sol_bad said:http://www.vgcharts.org/aconscomps.php?name1=PS3&name2=X360&type=0&align=0
So why were people not screaming that Mcrosoft were in deep shit back on February of 2006?
The amount of Sony hate is amazing.
sol_bad said:http://www.vgcharts.org/aconscomps.php?name1=PS3&name2=X360&type=0&align=0
So why were people not screaming that Mcrosoft were in deep shit back on February of 2006?
The amount of Sony hate is amazing.
That too.TheGreatDave said:The 360 wasn't easily available. And it wasn't the ****ing PLAYSTATION 3.
Because it is at only 75% of what the 360 did which people considered bad back then.sol_bad said:http://www.vgcharts.org/aconscomps.php?name1=PS3&name2=X360&type=0&align=0
So why were people not screaming that Mcrosoft were in deep shit back on February of 2006?
The amount of Sony hate is amazing.
very fitting :lolDuderz said:
I agree about western sw, but PS3's poor sales in Japan suggests less support from Japanese developers for 360 in the long term (unless they're making games with a Western audience in mind, like LP), which will stiffle their ability to appeal to a wider base than the original Xbox. If things continue as they have been doing, Japanese support for games with potential in their home market will move to Wii, which will make a 360 port difficult.krypt0nian said:That's why 360, and by default PS3 will have no 3rd party support problems IMO. Software BOOMS on 360, and the PS3 ports are the obvious benefit.
I am doubting Halo 3's system selling potential, in that it won't be as many people think because it's the type of experience which is already selling the console. A good amount of the Halo audience will already have the hw by the time the game is released, but it's still going to be a huge title and probably the biggest selling this year in NA.Jtyettis said:Do you really, really think Mario is going to trump Halo 3 sales this year? Haha, even with my love of Mario I know better than to make a faulty argument such as this.
I agreeaztrex said:You know what's gonna happen when even more people get their hands on a Wii? Word of mouth will spread faster. It will snowball. In my estimation, we haven't seen anything yet. This holiday season is gonna be an absolute wiiwash.
But this is their biggest problem when it comes to trying to create a mass market console. Sony and MS are so busy trying to outdo each other they didn't realise a more involved, more complicated, more time consuming experience could be something the mass market doesn't want.Merovingian said:Here's what MS needs to do, drop the damm price, no more waiting. MS was waiting for Sony to make a movie, but it so happens that the Wii is the one with the foot in the pedal man. Sony needs to wake the **** up, home and little big planet? Mother****er your console costs 600$, get real...
Unless MS and Sony trully believe that the Wii is going to live in its own market, with very different games from the 360/ps3 (Wich has to happen, since The wii doesn't have the horse power to make games like the ones on the 360/Ps3) and let it go on its own while MS and Sony keep trying to outdo eachother.
...
Man...this sucks, i have a Wii, my only game bought was Zelda, i like the wii...but i don't want the Wii to be the future of this industry, i mean, whatever have two kind of markets, but don't make the Wii the standard....
I'm praying for that
RumpledForeskin said:Well Sony said the shortages should be over in May so expect those numbers to maybe triple for the PS3.
By future of this industry you mean inovative and cheap?Merovingian said:Man...this sucks, i have a Wii, my only game bought was Zelda, i like the wii...but i don't want the Wii to be the future of this industry, i mean, whatever have two kind of markets, but don't make the Wii the standard....
sol_bad said:http://www.vgcharts.org/aconscomps.php?name1=PS3&name2=X360&type=0&align=0
So why were people not screaming that Mcrosoft were in deep shit back on February of 2006?
The amount of Sony hate is amazing.
Either you weren't on the board at the time or you suffered memory loss since that time. With no one in the field back then, it didn't matter quite as much how sales were. Now that all racers are on the track, things are different.sol_bad said:http://www.vgcharts.org/aconscomps.php?name1=PS3&name2=X360&type=0&align=0
So why were people not screaming that Mcrosoft were in deep shit back on February of 2006?
The amount of Sony hate is amazing.
That has long been my concern.Man...this sucks, i have a Wii, my only game bought was Zelda, i like the wii...but i don't want the Wii to be the future of this industry, i mean, whatever have two kind of markets, but don't make the Wii the standard....
They can't add horsepower to the current machine. That would require a completely new platform.By future of this industry you mean inovative and cheap?
You know, nintendo will add horsepower when its cheap...
Pipomantis said:
the ps2 NEVER EVER EVER only sold as little as what the ps3 just sold in any month of it's existance. that's your perspective. even in it's worse month of all time, the PS2 sold more than the PS3 sold in february.sol_bad said:http://www.vgcharts.org/aconscomps.php?name1=PS3&name2=X360&type=0&align=0
So why were people not screaming that Mcrosoft were in deep shit back on February of 2006?
The amount of Sony hate is amazing.
felipeko said:By future of this industry you mean inovative and cheap?
You know, nintendo will add horsepower when its cheap...
But looks like it's just the end of the world for some ppl to wait few years...
sol_bad said:http://www.vgcharts.org/aconscomps.php?name1=PS3&name2=X360&type=0&align=0
So why were people not screaming that Mcrosoft were in deep shit back on February of 2006?
The amount of Sony hate is amazing.
Mrbob said:If you get out of the video game realm for a second, what amazes me is despite low PS3 hardware Blu Ray is currently spanking the shiznit out of HD DVD at the moment. And I suspect the same thing is going to happen in Europe after the PS3 launches.
I think it's perfectly reasonable to want current tech in a console, I don't think the Wii will dominate in NA so it's not a huge concern, but count me as a person who thinks the 360/PS3 is the right level of tech for this period and especially into 2008 and beyond.felipeko said:You know, nintendo will add horsepower when its cheap...
But looks like it's just the end of the world for some ppl to wait few years...
fanduck said:Wow, Everybody has missed the obvious answer. 1 year ago, you still couldn't find an Xbox 360! They were still being sold out. PS3 on the other hand is very plentiful in stock. That's the difference.
People wanted 360's back then, they just couldn't find them.
Yes it is surprising. The reigning champ just had their system, four months out the door and readily available everwhere, sell not only worse than the 360 has so far, but worse than the PS2 ever has in its entire lifecycle. March will not change this much at all. It's all about the price.spwolf said:Is it really that suprising? PS3 had 1 awful game come out in 2 months of Jan/Feb and thats it. It should be the worst month for PS3.
March and April on the other hand... 15 new games, blockbuster movie... now if they dont manage to get it up in March and April, then there is an problem...
PS2 sales on the other hand... Both hardware and software is kicking arse...
Eteric Rice said:I love how everyone is praying to God that a $400 and $600 game system wins. Thanks for trying to price me out of the market, guys. :/
Go Wii!
the only PS2 game to get into the top 10 in the software charts comes out for xbox 360 next month... just something to mull over.spwolf said:Is it really that suprising? PS3 had 1 awful game come out in 2 months of Jan/Feb and thats it. It should be the worst month for PS3.
March and April on the other hand... 15 new games, blockbuster movie... now if they dont manage to get it up in March and April, then there is an problem...
PS2 sales on the other hand... Both hardware and software is kicking arse...
For PS3, looking at attach rates, there are at least 100,000 PS3's purchased as BD players only.
Merovingian said:What? They go down in price you know?
So saving $50 warrants 5 years of lower spec gaming?Eteric Rice said:Yeah, I get to sit around for a year or more waiting for that. Sounds like fun. :lol
Sorry, not paying over $300 for a game system, ever.
felipeko said:You know, nintendo will add horsepower when its cheap...
Merovingian said:Wait a few years? I ain't waiting for shit, 360/Ps3 are here baby.
But how some can wait another 5 years...you guys think you gonna live forever? How can you wait?
And nintendo will add horsepower? I don't care about what Nintendo does or doesn't do, i'm more concerned about what MS and Sony might or not do.
Right now, i wanna se a price cut, with the games coming out this year and a pricecut, i see no reason for the 360 to not beat the Wii, and sony should do the same.
I don't want the Wii to fail, hell i bought a damm Cube, i like Nintendo, i also have a DS..the thing is, the way some of you guys put things is scary son. Hopefully some of you guys don't know shit about how this works, and things will turn out Fine.
dark10x said:So saving $50 warrants 5 years of lower spec gaming?
A console is a ONE TIME EXPENSE. You can get a 360 for $50 more than a Wii!
Eteric Rice said:Yeah, I get to sit around for a year or more waiting for that. Sounds like fun. :lol
Sorry, not paying over $300 for a game system, ever.
Um, dont be to quick to state that. The Wii is currently outselling the PS2 in the same time frame by a pretty hefty margin, with ZERO lack of demand, and the 360 is only a hair above the original XBOX. If demand continues for the Wii, and Nintendo starts to produce more, it could, in its first year, really produce some spectacular results.MickeyKnox said:Before there is anymore rampant fanboy delusions I think this needs to be said.
The PS2 style domination where one company hold more market share than the other two combined is not happening again. Nor do Sony or Ms necessarily want that kind of dynamic in the first place. Whoever the "victor" is, it will be by a much closer margin than last gen.
And that is probably what's best for the industry in terms of keeping things competitive and insuring decent length hardware cycles.
...and why do you say that?Eteric Rice said:I could get the "gimped" 360 for $50 more.
No thanks.
GitarooMan said:I think it's perfectly reasonable to want current tech in a console, I don't think the Wii will dominate in NA so it's not a huge concern, but count me as a person who thinks the 360/PS3 is the right level of tech for this period and especially into 2008 and beyond.
A few years is a long time, I can't be the only one who wouldn't want to play with last gen tech till 2011.
dark10x said:...and why do you say that?
Like the Wii, you'd have to buy certain components separately. That is inline with previous console generations. Nintendo is the one ripping you off this time.
You didn't have to buy a video cable? Wonderful, then the only component you'd need to purchase for XBOX360 is a memory card (just like PS2). You're paying a little more for a LOT more.Um, I have a Wii. I didn't have to buy seperate components.
And ripping me off? The Wii might not be some hugely powerful system, but at least I could afford it without paying nearly a half a grand for it.
Eteric Rice said:Um, I have a Wii. I didn't have to buy seperate components.
And ripping me off? The Wii might not be some hugely powerful system, but at least I could afford it without paying nearly a half a grand for it.
Jeeze.
Thanks for trying to price me out of the market, guys. :/
dark10x said:You didn't have to buy a video cable? Wonderful, then the only component you'd need to purchase for XBOX360 is a memory card (just like PS2). You're paying a little more for a LOT more.
Nintendo can manufacture a Wii for $135. They are selling to the system for well over cost and making a serious profit.
Is money really THAT tight? It's a ONE TIME cost and it's just slightly higher than the Wii.
This argument always comes up and it's ridiculous. Just because I like old games doesn't mean I don't want to see new games as well using newer technology. I like playing old games and I like progress at the same time, is that hard to comprehend? I don't think old games are automatically bad, but would I want new games to look like PS1 games? No.MrNyarlathotep said:Its funny that your screen name is a PS2 game that could have been done on a PSOne and you're complaining about games being made with 'last gen tech' as though they're automatically bad games.
Oh, it's certainly not crazy at all. It's very smart.fanduck said:Crazy to think a company would sell a system for a profit!
fanduck said:Crazy to think a company would sell a system for a profit!
This picture slays me every fricken time.PhoenixDark said:DS:
PS3:
Mrbob said:If you get out of the video game realm for a second, what amazes me is despite low PS3 hardware Blu Ray is currently spanking the shiznit out of HD DVD at the moment. And I suspect the same thing is going to happen in Europe after the PS3 launches.
The Experiment said:Xbox 360 sold 1.1 million units in December in the US.
ziran said:However, I doubt 360 support is going to dry up totally, it has a big enough installed base of enthusiastic people who buy a lot of games, so 3rd parties will continue to support it.