Pokeylongo
Member
Holy shit, that's amazing! :lolXiaNaphryz said:Still catching up on this thread in the early pages so I dunno if this has been posted yet, but I had to do it:
Holy shit, that's amazing! :lolXiaNaphryz said:Still catching up on this thread in the early pages so I dunno if this has been posted yet, but I had to do it:
Francois the Great said:
speculawyer said:Why the HELL do people misquote others? Who said that it would 'suddenly spell doom' for Nintendo? It wouldn't. Nintendo has great first party IP. But waggle-wands for the 360 and/or PS3 means they could do Wii Sports clones & such . . . in HDTV. This would take away some of Nintendo's waggle-novelty.
25 PACHTER 202*
Deku said:Just noticed this. Everyone who participated on GAF beat him in terms of accuracy.
speculawyer said:Why the HELL do people misquote others? Who said that it would 'suddenly spell doom' for Nintendo? It wouldn't. Nintendo has great first party IP. But waggle-wands for the 360 and/or PS3 means they could do Wii Sports clones & such . . . in HDTV. This would take away some of Nintendo's waggle-novelty.
Deku said:Peripherals don't work like that, especially on the 360 this far into its lifespan. It's like me saying Wii can actually do HD if Nintendo would just release a brand new console that can do HD. Not realistic.
Deku said:Your inference that it would be very simple to add in an entirely new control scheme for established platform is a bit disingenuous. It's about as comparable as Nintendo coming out with a brand new platform that is HD capable.
Deku said:Just noticed this. Everyone who participated on GAF beat him in terms of accuracy.
speculawyer said:Big difference there. A Wii HD would cost hundreds. A waggle game with waggle-wand included could be sold for $50 for the PS3 or 360. Want proof? . . . Wii Play. I'd be surprised if neither MSFT nor Sony do that.
speculawyer said:Big difference there. A Wii HD would cost hundreds. A waggle game with waggle-wand included could be sold for $50 for the PS3 or 360. Want proof? . . . Wii Play. I'd be surprised if neither MSFT nor Sony do that.
BEST GIF EVERXiaNaphryz said:Still catching up on this thread in the early pages so I dunno if this has been posted yet, but I had to do it:
kencallsouendan.gif
speculawyer said:Seriously . . . you think a waggle-wand with a few accelerometers is the same as launching a new console? C'mon!
Tristam said:GAF am hired?
speculawyer said:Big difference there. A Wii HD would cost hundreds. A waggle game with waggle-wand included could be sold for $50 for the PS3 or 360. Want proof? . . . Wii Play. I'd be surprised if neither MSFT nor Sony do that.
sp0rsk said:He should participate in our prediction thread. I know he's lurking!
DayShallCome said:Not that it matters, but Xbox and GC predictions have not been considered as part of the prediction competition. This stemmed from the fact that there have been some months where we didn't receive Xbox or GC numbers from NPD. I only move up a spot (maybe), but there could be a change of first place.
(Ignoring GC numbers), Top 25.
1 BuzzJive 108
2 Tf53 109
3 speculawyer 118
4 Dimmuxx 121
5 apujanata 127
6 DayShallCome 130
7 Mallika 135
8 argon 153
8 Giddeon 153
10 donny2112 154
11 Parl 156
11 F#A#Oo 156
13 Xabora 158
14 chibicicylist 160
14 corez 160
16 Clever Pun 161
17 sonycowboy 163
18 Pope Benedict XVI 165
19 Branduil 168
20 perfectchaos007 176
21 John Dunbar 179
22 PhoenixDark 180
23 Barf_the_Mog 181
24 Orgen 182
25 PACHTER 189
Yes well... there are a total of 161 people who picked. Pachter just rounded up the top 25 (~Top 16%)Deku said:Just noticed this. Everyone who participated on GAF beat him in terms of accuracy.
You win the thread.XiaNaphryz said:ouendan_s.gif
Deku said:Except peripherals don't work like that. Cost is lower sure, but the uptake would be difficult and it would be impossible to establish a new standard without having to simultaenously support the old controller. I think you forgot the lessons Sega learned in the 90s.
Deku said:The closest you'll get is an eyetoy style device. Same difference.
speculawyer said:Big difference there. A Wii HD would cost hundreds. A waggle game with waggle-wand included could be sold for $50 for the PS3 or 360. Want proof? . . . Wii Play. I'd be surprised if neither MSFT nor Sony do that.
Tristam said:Wii Play is bundled with a controller that is used for every other game on the system. More proof plz.speculawyer said:A waggle game with waggle-wand included could be sold for $50 for the PS3 or 360. Want proof? . . . Wii Play.
speculawyer said:It is an OPTIONAL alternate controller. Very few games would support it.
Sega's peripheral problems were add-ons like the CD drive . . . not a controller included with a game.
Exactly . . . and the eyetoy was a huge success. A PS3/360 waggle-wand would be just like the eyetoy . . . it would be sold with a game and most games would not support it.
The point of this waggle-wand is not to wipe the Wii off the face of the earth. The point is to get customers who are trying to decide between a high-powered HD console & a fun waggle-box to pick the one that can do both. The Wii would still get plenty of sales for people totally into waggle and want Nintendo 1st party IP.
DantesWrath said:I hope those numbers will make Sony realize that $600 is just too much for the average gamer.
DefectiveReject said:you sir are an idiot
speculawyer said:The Wii-mote can be used with other games . . . so that means the PS3 & 360 could not produce a waggle-mote & game? That makes no sense.
jarrod said:Interface add-ons or changes *can* be done successfully (Genesis 6 button, Dual Shock, Rumble Pak, etc) but the longer Microsoft waits, the harder it'll be. Plus, it's not like Sixaxis seems to be helping PS3 any, the press and the mainstream see it more as derivative copycating... if Microsoft did the same it'd come off as a bit desperate.
I'd rather they work on getting a HDD into every 360 first honestly. Save waggle for the next round, it's not going to be doing 360 any appreciable favors most likely.
Tristam said:Since 360 and PS3 Wii Sports clones would be inherently superior (the HD difference), then, by inference (since waggle is all Nintendo has going for it, amirite?) it would spell doom for Nintendo.
Take your pick: a peripheral that few games support and fails to gain any sort of mainstream popularity or a default waggle wand (again, the latter needs no further explanation).
EDIT: I don't know how I can make it any plainer. A waggle wand for 360 or PS3 simply will_not_gain_traction.
Flesh Into Gear said:I'm pretty sure Nintendo could of implmented HD without having to spend much.
speculawyer said:The point of this waggle-wand is not to wipe the Wii off the face of the earth. The point is to get customers who are trying to decide between a high-powered HD console & a fun waggle-box to pick the one that can do both. The Wii would still get plenty of sales for people totally into waggle and want Nintendo 1st party IP.
Blablurn said:I think I'm going to stop playing games
Then its an eyetoy.speculawyer said:It is an OPTIONAL alternate controller. Very few games would support it.
Sega's peripheral problems were add-ons like the CD drive . . . not a controller included with a game.
itsme said:It's pretty clear from the above statements that you have no clue what's going on. It's more than "waggle wand" that made Wii as successful as it enjoys now. If you truely believe that all it takes for sony and ms to run over nintendo is to release the "waggle wand", you can't be any further from truth.
Tristam said:I don't know how I can make it any plainer. A waggle wand for 360 or PS3 simply will_not_gain_traction.
that's the point. why should I buy a periferal I can use with a game only while on the other hand there's a low-priced console that makes its existence on the waggling? also, I think that at this point games that needs "exaggerated" waggling (like wiisports) are immediately associated with the wii and vice versa.Exactly . . . and the eyetoy was a huge success. A PS3/360 waggle-wand would be just like the eyetoy . . . it would be sold with a game and most games would not support it.
scottnak said:Yes well... there are a total of 161 people who picked. Pachter just rounded up the top 25 (~Top 16%)
Francois the Great said:now stop the silly arguing and make with more gifs
Earthstrike said:Can someone please summarize any meltdowns I may have missed?
speculawyer said:Yeah . . . OK . . . they'll just release a magic HD chip that you can slide into the SDRAM slot.
And even though Nintendo can sell a waggle-mote with game for $50, it would be impossible for Microsoft or Sony to do so even though their systems have flexible wireless controller interfaces that have already been used to implement other controllers such as disc player remotes, steering wheels, headsets, etc.
Clearly I'm wasting my time here.