Yeah, I was doing the math for my news post, and was like, fuck, that can't be right, but it was.WindyMan said:I don't know if this is completely clear to everyone, but because of the four week July period, Wii sales increased 39% week-to-week from last month. That's a lot of new consoles, and sustained demand for them.
AdmiralViscen said:I remember circa May 2006 when if you said that price would hurt Sony, Sony guys would tell you to suck it. Now they shrug off PS3 sales because of course the cheapest sells better. While ignoring that Wii outsells the half-price PS2.
Nobody cares. Aww.JKBii said:I'd like some LTD data for the top ten for each platform, as well as data for specific games that aren't in the top ten that are requested (for example, I'm interested in the Madden Wii sales for next month but I don't think they'll make the top ten). I'd also like tie ratios but something like that doesn't really need to be updated monthly.
As for the image ban, I'm pretty new here but I thought it was understood that these threads were supposed to be laid back mini-parties. There are weekly Media Create threads, regular PAL threads, regular NPD threads, the Wii Takeover thread, and there are still thread made every so often about hardware sales, and they're all talking about the same basic trends. How often do you expect people to have the same discussion?
If you really want to talk about how the industry is moving based on hardware sales, it would be better to keep it in a separate thread and leave the routinely made sales threads to jokes and lighter discussion.
WindyMan said:I don't know if this is completely clear to everyone, but because of the four week July period, Wii sales increased 39% week-to-week from last month. That's a lot of new consoles, and sustained demand for them.
tha_con said:Where are full software numbers? I'm hearing word of 100K for Mario Strikers and 90K for RE4?
IMO, if you have 10 million consoles, you should be pushing a lot more software....right?
I mean, it's not doom and gloom, but that certainly doesn't sit well with me. Of course, this is still the beginning of the Wii's life cycle, and the casuals obviously don't buy much more than minigames, but still. Wow @ Wii Play pushing almost 300K. 5 months after release.
Just to prove it was this trailer's fault, we got shut down after the trailer was made even though we had an NPD employee (driley) as a member here since August 2004.Merovingian said:
Jive Turkey said:And go easy on FortunateSon...Between this and the Heavenly Sword thread the guy has had a really rough day!
AdmiralViscen said:I remember circa May 2006 when if you said that price would hurt Sony, Sony guys would tell you to suck it. Now they shrug off PS3 sales because of course the cheapest sells better. While ignoring that Wii outsells the half-price PS2.
tha_con said:Where are full software numbers? I'm hearing word of 100K for Mario Strikers and 90K for RE4?
IMO, if you have 10 million consoles, you should be pushing a lot more software....right?
I mean, it's not doom and gloom, but that certainly doesn't sit well with me. Of course, this is still the beginning of the Wii's life cycle, and the casuals obviously don't buy much more than minigames, but still. Wow @ Wii Play pushing almost 300K. 5 months after release.
The US stole Wii consoles from Canada.Kobun Heat said:Yeah, I was doing the math for my news post, and was like, fuck, that can't be right, but it was.
Kind of puts the kill on those rumors from Taiwan that production increases weren't happening. That's two strikes for Digitimes.
minus_273 said:are you telling me you didnt didnt have the discipline to work a second job to get your ps3?
Psychotext said:I've just realised something... Hardly anyone seems to have mentioned Pachter's predictions. :lol
Psychotext said:I've just realised something... Hardly anyone seems to have mentioned Pachter's predictions. :lol
sonycowboy said:3) PS2 is the energizer bunny. When will it fall enough for Sony to drop it $99
Merovingian said:
Pretty much.fistfulofmetal said:Are people actually serious with this whole "It's over Sony" thing?
Really?
Haunted One said:FortunateSon snapped? :lol I knew it was just a matter of time. nice comments, Kobun.
What I called, if you read what I posted, was that PS3 will probably never surpass either of its competitor's NA numbers on a monthly basis. Combine the slow-ass crawl PS3 has been doing to reach two million in NA and the, so far, shit-tastic sales of the software for third parties on the system and you get a clear understanding of how poorly the platform is doing in the largest market. August will probably see X360 more than double its July numbers (price drop/Madden being key points of interest) and then start seeing how, with Halo 3 and others will help cement everything against PS3 by end of September.
By end of holiday season (January to February), PS3 will likely have seen the highest numbers it will ever see for the rest of its lifespan in NA, IMO. It's all going to snowball away from them just as it has for many third place systems that lag seriously behind the other two. Third parties will likely drop many titles from their PS3 lists by February if software sales don't pick up soon. In NA, Sony's stuck in third
tha_con said:The buzz is most certainly still there, and people 'want' them, but until it drops in price, it won't be shattering records. Still, as has been pointed out, isn't it selling better than the PS1 and PS2?
schuelma said:Why do people keep saying this?
MightyHedgehog said:What I called, if you read what I posted, was that PS3 will probably never surpass either of its competitor's NA numbers on a monthly basis. Combine the slow-ass crawl PS3 has been doing to reach two million in NA and the, so far, shit-tastic sales of the software for third parties on the system and you get a clear understanding of how poorly the platform is doing in the largest market. August will probably see X360 more than double its July numbers (price drop/Madden being key points of interest) and then start seeing how, with Halo 3 and others will help cement everything against PS3 by end of September. By end of holiday season (January to February), PS3 will likely have seen the highest numbers it will ever see for the rest of its lifespan in NA, IMO. It's all going to snowball away from them just as it has for many third place systems that lag seriously behind the other two. Third parties will likely drop many titles from their PS3 lists by February if software sales don't pick up soon. In NA, Sony's stuck in third.
tha_con said:Anyone care to think it's not really a matter of people wanting a PS3, rather, them wanting to spend $500 to get a PS3?
I know a LOT of people who want one.
I don't know a lot of people who want one at $500.
The buzz is most certainly still there, and people 'want' them, but until it drops in price, it won't be shattering records. Still, as has been pointed out, isn't it selling better than the PS1 and PS2?
That's not much to go buy, but I certainly wouldn't start proclaiming doom and gloom.
Sony could still break 100M this generation, and honestly, they could probably care less about 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. Selling consoles and making money is what's important, and if PS3 makes Blu-ray a success, then sony could give a shit about VG's and the Playstation brand.
I'd rather listen to someone who cites history than someone who cites... what exactly? Faith?FortunateSon said:So what you're saying is, just "go by the history" is that it? You are going by history that just because all 3rd place system that lag in the beginning will basically end up last.
schuelma said:Why do people keep saying this?
schuelma said:Why do people keep saying this?
No, not at this point... 6-9 months ago? Sure, it was a possibility... but at this point Sony has lost SOOO much ground in consumer mindshare, third party goodwill, and just the damned install base...tha_con said:Anyone care to think it's not really a matter of people wanting a PS3, rather, them wanting to spend $500 to get a PS3?
And go easy on FortunateSon...Between this and the Heavenly Sword thread the guy has had a really rough day!
Fuzzy said:Just to prove it was this trailer's fault, we got shut down after the trailer was made even though we had an NPD employee (driley) as a member here since August 2004.
tha_con said:Anyone care to think it's not really a matter of people wanting a PS3, rather, them wanting to spend $500 to get a PS3?
I know a LOT of people who want one.
I don't know a lot of people who want one at $500.
The buzz is most certainly still there, and people 'want' them, but until it drops in price, it won't be shattering records. Still, as has been pointed out, isn't it selling better than the PS1 and PS2?
That's not much to go buy, but I certainly wouldn't start proclaiming doom and gloom.
Sony could still break 100M this generation, and honestly, they could probably care less about 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. Selling consoles and making money is what's important, and if PS3 makes Blu-ray a success, then sony could give a shit about VG's and the Playstation brand.
BenjaminBirdie said:Unfortunately for Sony (and not just the PS3) a major sports title sold more on the 360 than the PS2.
Merovingian said:I still don't get it. Why did they do that? What's the problem?
FortunateSon said:Xbox360 doubling its numbers in August? Uh, no. If I'm not wrong, when Gears came out, 360 hardware barely got a bump in hardware sales. So, you think with Madden and a $50 price drop (which by all means isn't a significant drop. Nothing big at all) will push big numbers for the 360?
Honestly, Halo 3 and "others" will cement Ps3 by the end of September? I will hold you to that.
You don't know that! Ps3 has some big games coming out in 2008 and I mean BIG. There's still the price drop and among other issues. So what you're saying is, just "go by the history" is that it? You are going by history that just because all 3rd place system that lag in the beginning will basically end up last. That's great mate. Great.
I will also hold you to the claim of "3rd parties dropping out on the Ps3 if the Ps3 software sales don't pick up soon, by February"
And again, with that comment. "Sony's stuck in 3rd". Guy, they aren't. They have many siituations in-hand which can play out differenlt and turn the tides. You never know.
Merovingian said:I still don't get it. Why did they do that? What's the problem?
it's not a valid comparison really because for the PS1 and PS2 there are less months of sales (when you consider the later american and european). the PS1 was a system from an unproven manufacturer so it's natural it's sales were slower as the brand was slowly building.tha_con said:Is it false? I thought it was selling more thus far than the PS1 or PS2?
World wide Figures at least.
Merovingian said:I still don't get it. Why did they do that? What's the problem?
GarthVaderUK said:More than on PS2 and PS3 combined, in fact. Bodes well for Madden 08 on the platform.
sony won't sustain the raise... it is very rare for a manufacturer to sustain a sales spike after a price drop. MS's numbers on the other hand are without a price drop. Thus the gap will widen next month.. probably much more so given MS will be right at the beginning of a price drop and Sony will be a month later.Sean*O said:This almost leaves Microsoft no choice but to drop to $199 before the holiday season if they hope to remain on top.
laserbeam said:Trailer basically advertised Gaf supplied Numbers for free that people pay lots of money for.
Grecco said:The fact that we used to post all of their info? Info they charge thousands and thousands of dollars for? Gaf had it for free.
[Guy_Goma.jpg] .DeceitDecide said:My co-worker has a good point: where are all these Wii's coming from? Who's hoarding them?
Because NPD worked out an agreement with neogaf management to post the numbers. basically there was little chance NPD had in stopping the posting of the numbers themselves, and there was little incentive (or legal obligation) for neogaf mods to censor the numbers on their own. This way neogaf gets legit numbers for free and NPD's $12K fee (or whatever) doesn't all the sudden become worthless.Merovingian said:Ooh. So, why do we get these numbers still? (The ones in this thread)