Im at work myself. Sorry.
Its best if you watch it.
So you have the time to post the video and reply to my comment, but not to write up one or two lines summarizing the video?
Are you serious with this shit?
Im at work myself. Sorry.
Its best if you watch it.
Sanders walking away from a reporter trying to ask about the Nevada convention just shows how much of a pompous annoying self-serving narcissist he really is.
And somehow people think Berniebros will just magically flock to Hillary after he is forced to exit the race. Smh.
The infighting among the republicans during the debates was entertaining and spawned many a good meme. The infighting amongst democrats is just shameful.
Sanders should have kept it professional so he could have gone for that VP spot. Sanders supporters are a real risk for aligning with Trump after all this infighting finishes doing its damage
I've become very convinced that he does not actually care about progressive values as much as his own ego.
Early debates reflected the fact that he really didnt think of himself as a real candidate for president. As his support rose and he started to keep it closer than anticipated in the delegate count it became much more about him and the 'revolution' than about policy.
And as he started to view himself as a real candidate the revolution became the magic wand to explain how he would inact any of his policies if elected. See the NY Daily News interview about breaking up banks by magic.
The NY Daily News article was a clear hit piece. See this NY Times article for a more fair view of the exchange
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/07/u...s-something-about-breaking-up-banks.html?_r=0
Hillary supporters online have been trumpeting this interview as a big blow to Sanders without understanding a thing about what was actually said themselves. They just run with the headlines...
And somehow people think Berniebros will just magically flock to Hillary after he is forced to exit the race. Smh.
The infighting among the republicans during the debates was entertaining and spawned many a good meme. The infighting amongst democrats is just shameful.
Sanders should have kept it professional so he could have gone for that VP spot. Sanders supporters are a real risk for aligning with Trump after all this infighting finishes doing its damage
And somehow people think Berniebros will just magically flock to Hillary after he is forced to exit the race. Smh.
The infighting among the republicans during the debates was entertaining and spawned many a good meme. The infighting amongst democrats is just shameful.
Sanders should have kept it professional so he could have gone for that VP spot. Sanders supporters are a real risk for aligning with Trump after all this infighting finishes doing its damage
The NY Daily News article was a clear hit piece. See this NY Times article for a more fair view of the exchange
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/07/u...s-something-about-breaking-up-banks.html?_r=0
Hillary supporters online have been trumpeting this interview as a big blow to Sanders without understanding a thing about what was actually said themselves. They just run with the headlines...
And somehow people think Berniebros will just magically flock to Hillary after he is forced to exit the race. Smh.
The infighting among the republicans during the debates was entertaining and spawned many a good meme. The infighting amongst democrats is just shameful.
Sanders should have kept it professional so he could have gone for that VP spot. Sanders supporters are a real risk for aligning with Trump after all this infighting finishes doing its damage
The NY Daily News article was a clear hit piece. See this NY Times article for a more fair view of the exchange
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/07/u...s-something-about-breaking-up-banks.html?_r=0
Hillary supporters online have been trumpeting this interview as a big blow to Sanders without understanding a thing about what was actually said themselves. They just run with the headlines...
Something is wrong with Sanders.
Something is wrong with his supporters.
They have mental issues and do not know how to deal with reality when things don't go their way.
I think I'm comfortable assuming that if you can't be bothered to summarize the video it's not worth my time to watch it.
Fuck that.
One of my pet peeves is when people post videos without any context or explanation of whar makes the vieo relevant.
I mean you dont have to LOL. It has video of the tomfoolery happening. Watch it or don't. If you dont care about video evidence,.So you have the time to post the video and reply to my comment, but not to write up one or two lines summarizing the video?
Are you serious with this shit?
The NY Daily News article was a clear hit piece. See this NY Times article for a more fair view of the exchange
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/07/u...s-something-about-breaking-up-banks.html?_r=0
Hillary supporters online have been trumpeting this interview as a big blow to Sanders without understanding a thing about what was actually said themselves. They just run with the headlines...
Another article
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-daily-news_us_5704779ce4b0a506064d8df5
The NY Daily News article was a clear hit piece. See this NY Times article for a more fair view of the exchange
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/07/u...s-something-about-breaking-up-banks.html?_r=0
Hillary supporters online have been trumpeting this interview as a big blow to Sanders without understanding a thing about what was actually said themselves. They just run with the headlines...
This is an actual opinion held by my barber, no joke.
These threads are always a hoot.
Sanders supporters are worse than Trump supporters, worse than Gamergaters, now just plain mentally ill.
The 'otherization' on here is truly something to behold.
Unlike Hilary
Yeah yeah I know whataboutism etc but of all self-serving narcissists I'd rather have one that serves my class interests
To put a fine point on it: Thus far, Sanders has taken a more prominent stand against Planned Parenthood than he has against his supporters increasingly erratic behaviour. He is basically the one person on the planet that could calm things down and he is choosing to remain silent on the subject.
Not sure how that serves your class interests, but it doesn't do much for mine.
Per @DannyEFreeman, Sanders held press avail while in Puerto Rico. When asked about NV tension/chaos, Sanders walked away during middle of Q
you gotta see Bernie supporters outside trump rallies, some of the most hateful violent people.
https://twitter.com/mmurraypolitics/status/732588761423486976
Literally running away from reality that his campaign is out of control (and out of money)
Thanks, this is very helpful.
So really quick:
I think that this is a misreading of the rules. Take a look at VII. c. and d. The first adoption of permanent rules is a majority vote. Only after that is a supermajority required. So if the permanent rules contain changes relative to the temporary rules when they're first offered only a majority vote is necessary to adopt those changes.
The timeline is basically like this:
* Convention is called to order under the temporary rules.
* Chair hears a motion to adopt permanent rules (with some changes) under VII.c. That motion succeeds by a majority vote and the permanent rules are adopted.
* Convention is now proceeding under the permanent rules, including changes. Amending the permanent rules requires a supermajority under VII.d.
No rules violation required. Note that the rules also don't guarantee that the convention will wait for every delegate to be seated before holding votes. That's, again, pretty standard for a parliamentary system. You're supposed to be in the chamber in order to cast votes!
I'm kind of getting the impression that the majority of the complaints in that post stem from a misunderstanding of the rules. For example, note that Robert's Rules of Order don't require the chair to recognize any motions. Just because you stand up and say "I move xx thing" does not actually entitle your motion to a debate and vote. So all the complaints about how people's motions weren't recognized and voted on are, like, fundamentally Hollywood understandings of parliamentary procedure. If the chair doesn't want to hear your motion they just won't, that is pretty much why being the chair is so important.
If you want to debate on whether that was CORRECT that's a separate topic (although I think already a much-belabored one), but I am not sure yet I see any evidence that the rules were VIOLATED.
You're saying the stage wasn't stormed. That people didn't push against the dias... and your evidence *can't* prove this, unless it covers the stage for the entirety of the convention. Which it doesn't.
https://twitter.com/mmurraypolitics/status/732588761423486976
Literally running away from reality that his campaign is out of control (and out of money)
I suppose he should've just guffawed at the question and ignored it.Can we all come together and agree on how shitty this looks? You are a grown-ass man who is aspiring for the highest office in the country. Be professional.
This is a guy who has expressed admiration for Fidel Castro and Daniel Noriega.Not the greatest of looks
I really don't understand why he hasn't dropped out.
Then the Democrats whine about independents stealing votes they think should be rightfully their's (like Nader). It's a no win situation. It will be Democrats whining either way.
I suppose he should've just guffawed at the question and ignored it.
Irate Berne Sanders supporters did not just leave threatening voicemails and texts for state Democratic Party Chairwoman Roberta Lange but also launched an assault on the businesses she oversees, the owner says.
Tom Gallagher, the former Caesars CEO and congressional candidate, said that his son's tavern, the Porchlight Grille, began receiving threats shortly after the convention ended in chaos Saturday. Lange is the day operations manager there.
"Beginning about 3am on Sunday morning our bartenders at Porchlight Grille began getting non-stop phone threats from Bernie partisans," Gallagher told me via email. "The level of threats including death threats and vitriol was astonishing. One of our bartenders was actually a Bernie supporter and was stunned at the threats he was hearing on the phone. He began to respond telling people that he was just trying to do his job and pay off his student loans and their tactics were harming his livelihood. It made no difference to the callers. Their goal was to harass and as became clear....to shut down the business and Roberta’s job with it."
Gallagher said the calls continued during the day Sunday until the eatery disconnected the phone.
"At one point on Sunday before we unplugged the phones, I took a turn at answering and experienced such a nasty call that a Metro officer who happened to be in the tavern as a customer picked up the call and attempted to encourage the woman to stop, explaining that what she was doing was unlawful harassment," Gallagher told me. "It made no difference. She actually responded that it was her right of free speech."
And then the social media assault commenced.
From Gallagher: "The Porchlight website and Facebook page were similarly attacked with threats, including by someone who set up a fake 'Roberta Lange' ID on Facebook and then posted on the Porchlight Facebook page incredibly slanderous attacks against both Roberta and her husband Ken, including a post by the so-called 'Roberta Lange' that accused her husband Ken of crimes against children!"
Gallagher then said people began posting negative reviews of the business on Yelp "claiming all kind of bad experiences. On the Google site for the tavern someone posted that it was “permanently closed”! We have so far been unable to get Google to correct this. Needless to say our business has been affected negatively. In 50 years in politics I have never seen stuff like this."
Except that the young people will turn into old people and mellow out and become normal humans that don't see the world so dogmatically.
What the hell is Ralston Reports? Never heard of the site until today.
What the hell is Ralston Reports? Never heard of the site until today.
Are there more sources for this? Because if true that is very telling.https://twitter.com/mmurraypolitics/status/732588761423486976
Literally running away from reality that his campaign is out of control (and out of money)
"Yes, yes, this is bad.. but both sides are at fault here. Had you allowed us to scream our way into thwarting the Will of the People, this wouldn't've had to happen."
Considering that the motion to adopt the temporary rules as permanent rules was left up to a voice vote, I don't see how you could assert with any degree of certainty that there was any kind of majority in favor of the change. All video evidence suggests otherwise.
Also, according to Robert's Rules of Order, some motions must be recognized, like a point of order if there is an appeal of the ruling of the chair (which there most definitely was). Of course, this was completely ignored, and the chair just did whatever the fuck she felt like.
The letter says that this happened for the majority of the time when Sanders delegates disagreed with procedure. That allegation is completely false.
Yes, but you see, the real issue here is voter disenfranchisement and I have a video that proves it. Don't ask me to comment on it though.
It's also designed to prevent insurgent candidates and non Democrats from taking over the Dem party. Which is what it did.
Again, if you want to vote for the Democratic nominee for president, it probably helps to be a Democrat.
This is what happens when a small group of loud, angry people shouts into an echo chamber and mistakes the dissonance for some kind of revolutionary majority.
It's telling that they're so upset about losing the voice vote - they know the only way they can win is by screaming more loudly and pretending theirs is the voice of the people.
When Thayer, the creator of the superdelegate list, was told people were feeling harassed and unpersuaded, here's what he said:
"It's likely that most callers are actually polite. If a few people contacting superdelegates are being obscene they'll of course drown out reasonable voices and harden opinions. However, it's useful to look at what's causing some of the anger and outrage we're seeing.
"Voters know they are being disenfranchised by superdelegate influence and these privileged voters are a reasonable target for frustration. And, let's be honest, if superdelegates aren't prepared to deal with the public, they shouldn't be party officials."
"They said, you know, you should go to hell," said Ensley, describing another message. "How dare you vote against your own interests as an African-American woman. I expected you would be smarter than that."
Yeah, now more than ever I'm more than happy with Hillary and glad we dodged the Bernie bullet.Are there more sources for this? Because if true that is very telling.
I know that the losing team is expected to act out in weird ways before admitting defeat, but I never thought the Bernie campaign would go this far off the deep end. Their attitude and actions are hard to understand, and by now downright irresponsible.
Contrasting with how the Bernie campaign and its supporters are showing themselves lately, it makes me appreciate the somewhat calculated, never off-message, more policy and politics driven approach of Hillary.
If you're a fan of democracy and believe your vote should count, you should not patronize this restaurant. It's owned by a corrupt DNC leader who is part of the oligarchy establishment. If you believe in your right to vote, and the very fundamental founding principles of The USA... you should boycott this restaurant.