I'd just do the cpu and motherboard tbh.
The DIMMS in channel 1 are faster, so I figured to replace them all with the fastest DDR3. Is that doing too much?
Decided awhile back on the i5-4690K & the Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-B​K. Gonna set me back near $400 if I can scrounge it up anytime soon. :/
What are the speeds of them?
When I was buying Sandy Bridge I remember reading detailed articles suggesting that above 1600 there was almost no benefit at all in faster ram, though that might well have been specifically for gaming.
Faster channel can run @1866MHz, slower @1334MHz.
Is anyone playing Witcher 3 getting crash to desktop ever since getting this card? I played on a 780ti and never crashed once, but crash somewhat often when in Novigrad for some reason. Doesn't makes much sense, game runs smooth as butter but it will just randomly crash to desktop, and almost only when I'm in Novigrad
Is anyone playing Witcher 3 getting crash to desktop ever since getting this card? I played on a 780ti and never crashed once, but crash somewhat often when in Novigrad for some reason. Doesn't makes much sense, game runs smooth as butter but it will just randomly crash to desktop, and almost only when I'm in Novigrad
Does a 980Ti use a lot more power than a 970? I was running a 670 and a 6950 before that on my current 500W PSU, would it still be sufficient? Also, would a 980Ti let me run most games at 4K/30fps? I'm considering selling my 970 and upgrading, but am afraid my i5 2500k @ 4.5 GHz would hold it back.
Does a 980Ti use a lot more power than a 970? I was running a 670 and a 6950 before that on my current 500W PSU, would it still be sufficient? Also, would a 980Ti let me run most games at 4K/30fps? I'm considering selling my 970 and upgrading, but am afraid my i5 2500k @ 4.5 GHz would hold it back.
Does a 980Ti use a lot more power than a 970? I was running a 670 and a 6950 before that on my current 500W PSU, would it still be sufficient? Also, would a 980Ti let me run most games at 4K/30fps? I'm considering selling my 970 and upgrading, but am afraid my i5 2500k @ 4.5 GHz would hold it back.
Is the G1 better in any way than that liquid-cooled EVGA besides price? Seems like the G1 is the one to get but noise is really important to me.
What are the speeds of them?
When I was buying Sandy Bridge I remember reading detailed articles suggesting that above 1600 there was almost no benefit at all in faster ram, though that might well have been specifically for gaming.
EDIT: here it is
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4503/sandy-bridge-memory-scaling-choosing-the-best-ddr3/6
A Corsair article advertising the benefits of faster RAM...
A Corsair article advertising the benefits of faster RAM...
I mean, there are only two real world benchmarks there and only one is a game. He then 'concludes' that 1600Mhz isn't enough based on that.
Or, did they just cherry puck the two best case scenarios they could find while ignoring everything else that suggests improvements are minimal at best?
A Corsair article advertising the benefits of faster RAM...
I mean, there are only two real world benchmarks there and only one is a game. He then 'concludes' that 1600Mhz isn't enough based on that.
Or, did they just cherry puck the two best case scenarios they could find while ignoring everything else that suggests improvements are minimal at best?
Looks like buying a reference 980 ti will definitely save me around $100 (taxes included) than the non-reference card. This is making me think of buying a reference. What are the cons of reference card?
Or slap a hybrid cooler on it.It's louder and won't reach quite as high clocks at max OC.
hmm. Maybe I can got with reference and use the money I will saving on the monitor I'm planning to buy. I guess that's my option unless I change my mind again lolIt's louder and won't reach quite as high clocks at max OC.
It's louder and won't reach quite as high clocks at max OC.
The fastest clocked 980ti on the OCUK forums at this moment is a reference design.
Got a link to the thread?
Honestly wouldn't put it past OCUK to quickly bin all the cards they got to find that one beast and post the clocks themselves.
Gigabyte OC Guru doesn't give me any control over the LEDs on my second G1 Gaming card.
A stock 980 Ti can use up to 100W more, a factory overclocked one can use another 50W or more on top of that. 500W would be cutting it really really close, especially with that CPU overclock.
A system with an i7-5930K @ 4,4 GHz and a reference 980 Ti peaks at around 385w. About 425w with the G1 Gigabyte card.
I've never OC'd before and I'm getting the step up 980 Ti. Any tips on OCing or should I just try it out stock first?
Any programs I should download for temps and such?
I've never OC'd before and I'm getting the step up 980 Ti. Any tips on OCing or should I just try it out stock first?
Any programs I should download for temps and such?
So I'd be OK? I don't know if I'd get the G1 or not, is it worth the extra money?
Which one is better MSI GTX 980TI GAMING 6G or G1 Gaming?
Which one is better MSI GTX 980TI GAMING 6G or G1 Gaming?
Is 550W PSU enough for 980ti G1 card?
Just noticed G1 power requirement = 600W(with two 8-pin external power connectors)
My PSU: Silverstone ST55F-G 550W (600W peak power)
Woohoo, Newegg has the MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6G in stock! Got one ordered.
Not anymore LOL
I've never OC'd before and I'm getting the step up 980 Ti. Any tips on OCing or should I just try it out stock first?
Any programs I should download for temps and such?
Wow that was fast...
So I currently have a 1080p screen that I play games on and I'm considering buying a second 980 Ti. Am I crazy?
If it's 120 or 144 Hz, then no, I guess that's not crazy if you want to get your minimums up to your refresh rate. If you have a 60Hz monitor, it seems like a waste. You could use DSR (super sampling), but it won't look as crisp as having an actual higher res display.