AMD has been competitive when it comes to rasterization. They've lagged on Ray Tracing and ML compared to Nvidia who introduced acceleration for such for gaming applications. But hopefully their newer cards this year manage to catch up in these features.
/images/favicon.40.ico)
wiki.dolphin-emu.org
NVIDIA recently introduced its new DLSS 3 technology that adds a new feature known as Frame Generation on supported GPUs. The company officially said that this feature was only available on their new GeForce RTX 40 series cards but it looks like a Redditor has bypassed the lock & enabled it on an RTX 20 series graphics card.
DLSS 3 Lock Bypassed? Redditor Enables Frame Generation on GeForce RTX 2070 With A Simple Config File
The Redditor who goes by the username, JusDax, posted in the NVIDIA subreddit under a thread talking about new settings and features being added to Cyberpunk 2077. One of the upcoming features within Cyberpunk 2077 will be DLSS 3 which enables AI-Assisted frame generation that does wonders in boosting the frame rate.
The user says that he was able to bypass the DLSS 3 lock on older GeForce RTX cards by adding a config file to remove the VRAM overhead in Cyberpunk. He ran the game at 1440p with HDR off & DLSS set to balanced mode. He was also able to select the Frame Generation tab under the Ultra ray tracing preset.
DLSS Frame Generation doesn't seem to be hardware locked to RTX 40 series. I was able to bypass a software lock by adding a config file to remove the VRAM overhead in Cyberpunk. Doing this causes some instability and frame drops but I'm getting ~80 FPS on an RTX 2070 with the following settings:
2560x1440 res
HDR off
DLSS Balanced
DLSS Frame Generation ON
Ray Tracing Ultra preset
(I get ~35-40 FPS without Frame Generation and DLSS at Quality)
u/JusDax via r/NVIDIA
Without frame generation, his NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 gets around 35-40 FPS but with DLSS 3 frame generation enabled, the user got 80 FPS. That's almost twice or a bigger performance jump. The user did use a different DLSS preset (Balanced) to test frame generation but still, switching from quality to balanced preset even in DLSS 2 won't net you a 2x gain.
Full article : https://wccftech.com/nvidia-dlss-3-...rtedly-bypassed-rtx-2070-gets-double-the-fps/
I know this topic is about DLSS but yeah, everytime I go about emulating Switch games or PS3 or other stuff people say about "4k60fps!" and than you have audio issues, micro stutter from hell, etc etc. "It gets better the longer you play". Yeah no shit, that's the definition of "experimental" in my books and not "stable" for everyday use.I bet a tenner that the bolded is more severe than is being let on, its like Switch emulation:
"I get 180fps in Metroid Prime"
*watches their recorded video and the frametime graph is like the surface of the ocean during a tropical cyclone*
"Nah but I have a shader pack"
"How did you get it?"
"I performed every action in the whole game until it stopped stuttering"
Just play the whole game in a really annoying way first, then you can enjoy playing the game at a higher framerate guys, its simple stuff:
Over the last few years I've learned that one man's "its mostly stable" is my "It feels like someone is hitting me in the back of the head with a frying pan every 6 seconds"
Nvidia didnt say that.
Not sure but even if it was marginally better it didn't justify the silly premium G-sync monitors used to command. You should be happy that Freesync came along and put a stop to Nvidia's gouging.
Dunno, it feels like a strange statement given that 1080p interpolation shouldn't have the same requirements as 4k interpolation. Nevermind the difference between 60fps > 120fps and 120fps > 240fps.
I'm glad there's a cheaper option, but their tech was better and you can't hand wave facts. Also no one has made something as good for cheaper so who can say what the premium should cost. Some people want the best and can afford it.
The 6900XT was very close to the RTX 3090.
A lot more complex, done by the GPU and not by a weak TV CPU, and it doesn't add insane input lag like TVs do.
If the framerate is already horrible before, interpolation just amplifies it. Trash in trash out...
This doesn't mean it works on amd or intel hardware, it's still using the nvidia hardware to do it your just possibly sacrificing quality and upscaling performance by not using the tensor cores by running fsr/xess on standard compute.
How long do you think before it's hacked to work with FSR and on AMD GPU's?
Just chain 1,000 Voodoo 2 cards together.
