cash_longfellow
Member
If you want to see cringe, this is Nvidia's leader. The guy actually think's he's Fonzie.
If you want to see cringe, this is Nvidia's leader. The guy actually think's he's Fonzie.
Are you saying spending $1500+ is the chad move for just a GPU? I can afford it easily but its a dumb economical move and just like consoles, PC's are not efficient from a business aspect when you can leverage the uptime on the Cloud by sharing the servertime and partition the instance on a VM. Why the hell do you think every app is getting on there with AWS or Azure or Google Cloud? Also, these boxes are bottlenecking gaming in the first place.
Also what a stupid take on a wired ethernet gigabyte connection (which of course I have) perhaps your situation is crap but as said before a 25 MB connection in a 3rd World Country can give access to games due to regional pricing. And besides if you had used the service on a higher tier, you can customize your bitrate. As per your input anything can happen serverside when you're playing your games online that's if you exclusively play online games anyways you're one of those people who can see but is blind anyways. Let's end our interaction here.
You have no flex. Hold onto your box with the games that you think you own and stay there. I like how you give selective replies with no actual answers as well.
So by this you mean you want games to be made to cater for like a 3090 or a 4080 so majority of the gamers won't be able to play those games?
You're the one writing the paragraphs (*cough* promotions *cough*) to justify your choices, not me. Despite your best attempts I'm not interested in "flexing" what I have to you, it's embarrassing (for you) and of zero relevance in this discussion.
I wasn't talking about audio enthusiasts. Those aren't spending just $1000 on a home theater audio setup.While you are correct, you're forgetting audio enthusiast can upgrade their equipment more then once in a year regardless of if their current one is good enough.
There's always something better and new.
I mean I've had two subs in a matter of a year and planning to upgrade my fronts this year too and possibly get a secondary sub to match the new one.
And I've had 3 TVs in the last 8 years
My point is you shouldn't assume just because someone has a console it means they can't afford a PC.
Most even have a PC for other things, just not gaming.
This is probably why Nvidia feels so threatened by the consoles that they felt the need to attack the consoles, as most people simply aren't buying the RTX appendix on their PC games.Still find the best looking games on a $400 console...
Pc will always be the bottleneck, just look at steam hardware survey, less than 3% owns a 3070/3080(maybe a total of 4-5% for the total of 3070/3080/3090) rest are weaker cards that people have on their hands, dont even mention the cpu, much less people upgrade their cpus vs gpus each genNo it means that devs will be able to make the games of their desires without the limit of any processing power. At some point even PC's will be a bottleneck.
Yep at 30 fps or lower then 4K native right?Still find the best looking games on a $400 console...
You talk like majority of the PC builds can run native 4k60Yep at 30 fps or lower then 4K native right?
Agreed. Stupid comparison. A laptop has everything needed in the box to play a game. Whereas a traditional console does not.Comparing a $2000 laptop to a $500 console is akin to comparing a 4090 to a 3060; stupid as hell. If you wanna make a point, the products need some sort of equivalency. That's why the 4090 is compared to the 3090/Ti, it's flagship vs flagship. That's why the 4080 is compared to the 3080, it's high end vs high end.
No one compares a 3080 to a 3050 other than for academic purposes. Do you see NVIDIA coming out and go "The 4090 is 3x faster than the 3060"? No. That's because they damn well know it's stupid. They aren't equivalent products at all.
Hey I remember him, he was in FF XV.If you want to see cringe, this is Nvidia's leader. The guy actually think's he's Fonzie.
Mine do so…You talk like majority of the PC builds can run native 4k60
Okay and? What's the point of this post anyway outside of a little jab at platforms you don't like?Mine do so…
I like to look down at the inferior thing that’s whyOkay and? What's the point of this post anyway outside of a little jab at platforms you don't like?
Do you know how pathetic you sound?I like to look down at the inferior thing that’s why
Native? Like fake 4K on PC via DLSS right?Yep at 30 fps or lower then 4K native right?
You don’t know sarcasms right?Do you know how pathetic you sound?
At higher settings and framerate then the console offering? Sure.Native? Like fake 4K on PC via DLSS right?
You said NATIVE 4K as if not NATIVE 4K is a bad thing, yet we use DLSS on PC...At higher settings and framerate then the console offering? Sure.
Get out of my thread with your warring nonsense.You said NATIVE 4K as if not NATIVE 4K is a bad thing, yet we use DLSS on PC...
The games that the $400 console has that outshine anything on PC in their "respective categories" aren't available on PC.
Yet…a slow ass low framerate game don’t outshine nothing it only show that the hardware was push to its limit and cannot offer a fluid experience but whatever you like buddyYou said NATIVE 4K as if not NATIVE 4K is a bad thing, yet we use DLSS on PC...
The games that the $400 console has that outshine anything on PC in their "respective categories" aren't available on PC.
And they're all getting ported to PC.The games that the $400 console has that outshine anything on PC in their "respective categories" aren't available on PC.
That's two posts in a row trying to change goalposts, are you taking back what you said now?Yet…a slow ass low framerate game don’t outshine nothing it only show that the hardware was push to its limit and cannot offer a fluid experience but whatever you like buddy
The thread is about warring nonsense gtfoh!Get out of my thread with your warring nonsense.
GL with thatAnd they're all getting ported to PC.
It isn't. It's about NVIDIA making ridiculous claims and bad comparisons.The thread is about warring nonsense gtfoh!
Pretty sad that nvidia is salty enough to take jabs at consoles.
At the same settings or higher I can run a game like cyberpunk at native 4K with the better framerate then console sure but do I want to…That's two posts in a row trying to change goalposts, are you taking back what you said now?
The thread is about warring nonsense gtfoh!
Pretty sad that nvidia is salty enough to take jabs at consoles.
GL with that
But can do much more than 4x what a console can plus portability. The price differences between consoles and PCs don't matter until consoles can do the same or more than a PC can.but it's also 4x the price and is coming out 2 years after so I fucking hope it's much more powerful.
They are attacking the consoles/warring.It isn't. It's about NVIDIA making ridiculous claims and bad comparisons.
You come here with your "muh console is better than you" bullshit. Get lost.
Not every game but you know this.At the same settings or higher I can run a game like cyberpunk at native 4K with the better framerate then console sure but do I want to…
Nvidia is not the issue, is the people using this line of argument. and why videos like the ones Digital Fundry are cringe.
so?But the consoles are always 5-8 years behind the cutting edge GPUs anyways so... nothing new here.
*cues your first meme as a reply of insecurity* I don't need to say more after this reply because projection is a hell of a thing. Please cancel your electricity, internet, 5G Mobile, Console Memberships, Netflix etc. You're already dependent. I have to write sentences for a person who has to grasp the minor ideas for convenience and factuality. You should be embarrassed for yourself because now you're accusing me of exactly what you did. If you don't like Cloud gaming, fine, but don't shit on others for their choices. Remain economically poor if you want to purchase a $3500 computer, already gave you the math and if you can afford it like most of us can, its just a dumb move is my argument. Live and let live. You already own nothing, as also mentioned before.
Every friend of mine who games on Console only is richer than my friends who have PCs, most have 50K+ cash on hand in the bank + investments.
2 of My PC mates live Paycheck to paycheck & one many times throughout the years asked me for money, I gave him well over 2K€ to date. One of them One time asked me to pay is WoW annual subscription which I did.
So people who like PC even if they can't afford will find a way.
Pc will always be the bottleneck, just look at steam hardware survey, less than 3% owns a 3070/3080(maybe a total of 4-5% for the total of 3070/3080/3090) rest are weaker cards that people have on their hands, dont even mention the cpu, much less people upgrade their cpus vs gpus each gen
One of them One time asked me to pay is WoW annual subscription which I did.
Nvidia’s marketing is the issue. 4070ti claims 3x the performance of the 3090ti when its barely at 3090 levels.Nvidia is not the issue, is the people using this line of argument. and why videos like the ones Digital Fundry are cringe.
500% with dlss 3 aka fake frame generator. LolThat's not really true. In heavy ray traced games a 4090 is likely way more than 5x.
I bet a PS5 can't run Portal RTX or Cyberpunk overdrive mode.
Even without Ray tracing a 4090 can be 500% faster than a PS5 (using DLSS3).
[/URL]
Yep. I recently joined PC but still find console games at 60+ fps far more appealing.Not really. Plenty of people can afford any pc but still choose console.
But yeah, nvidia and pc market are crazy right now.
GoW Ragnarok looks better than the games I have played maxed out on my 7900xt.Still find the best looking games on a $400 console...
I like to look down at the inferior thing that’s why
The subscription is not that expensive.You do know its most likely that very subscription that is keeping him poor right?
Man you cloud gaming shills are all cut from the same sad cloth, it's hilarious. You came into this thread telling everyone they should rent via Nvidia's cloud service (even going as far as to highlight their $99 offering) and have since gone on to insult those of us who don't choose to go down that route (apparently I was supposed to be a "salty boy" because I've chosen to purchase my hardware instead of renting some 4080 cloud server from Nvidia at a monthly fee? Give me a break).
I've not once spent $3500 on a single computer and will never need to. The fact that you think that's how much it costs tells everyone everything they need to know. Hint: people who already own gaming hardware have the opportunity to upgrade at minimal cost every single year if they wish to do so. The same goes for ownership of anything provided you're sensible about it.
The subscription is not that expensive.
It's like 15 a month or less.
Last time you suck my dick you had a mouth full dont try to say otherwiseYour penis is very lucky then.
Last time you suck my dick you had a mouth full dont try to say otherwise
Bro what's keeping him poor is:I'm not referring to the price of the subscription itself...
Nvidia’s marketing is the issue. 4070ti claims 3x the performance of the 3090ti when its barely at 3090 levels.
I hate this argument when it comes to the subject of video games, and it always gets brought up as some point about how PC is superior to other platforms. Nobody is arguing that PCs can't "do more" then PCs they are arguing that for the price you pay it isn't worth it for some people. Also, some people don't use a computer really in general. I know a ton of people that don't own (or don't use the one they one) a laptop or desktop at all because its 2023 and the majority of things can be done from a phone or tablet.But can do much more than 4x what a console can plus portability. The price differences between consoles and PCs don't matter until consoles can do the same or more than a PC can.
Last time you suck my dick you had a mouth full dont try to say otherwise